Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:55 28 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:30 Shalford to Reading
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:20 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
22:10 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 21:56:03 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[104] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[103] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[78] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[56] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Return of the BRUTE?
[25] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 63
  Print  
Author Topic: Class 387 coming to Thames Valley - ongoing discussion  (Read 459748 times)
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: November 21, 2014, 18:30:51 »


I agree that in the longer term EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) with a better performance than the 319s will be needed to maximise track capacity. However, it was reported several months ago, after the franchise was extended, that fGW were told by the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) to stop work on procuring such trains. My impression then was that we were were going to be lumbered with the things[1] but I've since changed my mind. It may well be that the forthcoming Direct Award to fGW to continue operating the Western will permit, encourage or require that fGW starts procurement of more suitable trains. My reasoning is that the franchise extension is a continuation of the status quo, whereas the Direct Award is a new contract with different T&Cs and such requirements can be included.


My thoughts were that 'procurement' meant the full process of specifying the requirement in an ITT (Invitation to Tender), and then organising finance via a Rosco etc.  But using trains that someone else had already procured on DfT's behalf would simply be taking over a lease as directed by DfT; and that could apply to the 387/1s...

I suppose it depends how much you read into the exact meaning of the word...

Paul
Logged
drandles
Newbie
*
Posts: 4


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: December 09, 2014, 17:33:03 »

I believe FGW (First Great Western) have already indicated informally that they are negotiating to acquire the Class 387/1s.  The expected delivery rate of Class 700 units to Thamesllink should allow all 29 Class 387/1s to be released from Thameslink by December 2016 when the Oxford & Newbury electrification is due to be completed.

At present FGW uses (approx.) 36 Class 165/1 units and 21 Class 166 units.  Quite a few of these are used on diagrams over routes that will not be electrified under current plans (eg Reading-Gatwick, north of Oxford etc).  Additionally quite a few 166 diagrams will be worked by Class 800 IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) (eg Cotswold services).  So it is not inconceivable that the 29 Class 387/1s would be sufficient to cover the electrified Thames Valley local services on the GWML (Great Western Main Line).  The only uncertainty is what will be used on the electrified branch services to Marlow which will need to be 2 car units.

David

Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: December 09, 2014, 18:10:30 »

Can you say to whom they have informally indicated this to?

Or is it just heresay (ie you don't know)
Logged
DidcotPunter
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 166


View Profile Email
« Reply #18 on: December 09, 2014, 18:14:50 »

I believe FGW (First Great Western) have already indicated informally that they are negotiating to acquire the Class 387/1s.  The expected delivery rate of Class 700 units to Thamesllink should allow all 29 Class 387/1s to be released from Thameslink by December 2016 when the Oxford & Newbury electrification is due to be completed.

At present FGW uses (approx.) 36 Class 165/1 units and 21 Class 166 units.  Quite a few of these are used on diagrams over routes that will not be electrified under current plans (eg Reading-Gatwick, north of Oxford etc).  Additionally quite a few 166 diagrams will be worked by Class 800 IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) (eg Cotswold services).  So it is not inconceivable that the 29 Class 387/1s would be sufficient to cover the electrified Thames Valley local services on the GWML (Great Western Main Line).  The only uncertainty is what will be used on the electrified branch services to Marlow which will need to be 2 car units.

David



And don't forget that - eventually - the Reading to Paddington stoppers will be taken over by Crossrail and will be operated by Class 345 units. The 387/1s would be utilised on Padd-Newbury, Padd-Oxford services which aren't operated by IEP, and possibly Reading to Basingstoke. I expect the service to be completely recast post-electrification but I would have thought that 29 units would be enough, even allowing for some 8 or even 12 car trains on the main line in the rush hour.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: December 10, 2014, 08:50:11 »

That's eventually, while the largest number will be needed to start with....
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: December 10, 2014, 10:28:05 »

Hence my post on the previous page suggesting that 319s might be used as a stop-gap for a couple of years with the 387s remaining post-Crossrail.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2014, 14:04:48 by IndustryInsider » Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: December 10, 2014, 11:13:02 »

377s or 387s? Now I'm getting confused :-)
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: December 10, 2014, 13:17:34 »

377s or 387s? Now I'm getting confused :-)

Well the 387s were usually referred to as 377/8s for quite a long time...

Now that the things are being seen in service on the Brighton - Bedfords, they aren't that different from a 377.  There seems to be a reasonable assumption that the class number change was purely to differentiate their top speed - which is of course unused in their current employment.

Paul
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #23 on: December 10, 2014, 15:47:59 »

Can you say to whom they have informally indicated this to?

Or is it just heresay (ie you don't know)

Hmmm ... that reads a bit rude to me .... "Children!" or should I say "Child!"?

We have a separate board area - "The Rumour Mill" where we usually post completely unsubstantiated information, but that's only available to member who have reached a certain threshold of posts.   So in this thread, where the information comes from a newer member, it's perfectly  fine and the only place it could have been posted!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #24 on: December 10, 2014, 16:04:55 »

... is it just heresay ...

As a matter of interest, ChrisB, did you mean 'heresy' or 'hearsay'?  Roll Eyes
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #25 on: December 10, 2014, 16:41:44 »

Hearsay :-)
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #26 on: December 10, 2014, 16:43:17 »

Hoping to get an answer to my Q though
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: December 10, 2014, 19:57:48 »

Hoping to get an answer to my Q though

Desmond Llewelyn?  Huh Undecided Grin
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: December 10, 2014, 21:03:50 »

Hoping to get an answer to my Q though
Desmond Llewelyn?  Huh Undecided Grin
Or the new Q Ben Whishaw aka Paddington (keeping it railway related...I'll get my coat)
Logged
Western Pathfinder
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1528



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: December 10, 2014, 21:39:45 »

Hoping to get an answer to my Q though

Desmond Llewelyn?  Huh Undecided Grin

Best answer to a question ever 1 Never let them see you bleed. 2 Allways have an escape plan .
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 63
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page