Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:35 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
* A view from inside ship that hit Baltimore bridge
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:04 Bedwyn to Newbury
18:26 Newbury to Bedwyn
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
18:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
19:02 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
17:29 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 15:49:12 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[211] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[66] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[49] Who needs a travel agent these days?
[36] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[28] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[26] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 63
  Print  
Author Topic: Class 387 coming to Thames Valley - ongoing discussion  (Read 460267 times)
DidcotPunter
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 166


View Profile Email
« Reply #270 on: June 09, 2016, 10:24:11 »



Informed insiders would find it very difficult to deny these stories  Wink

 Grin Very good! Of course there are informed insiders on here too!


There is huge sense in having a single standard fleet (until a problems' found / check's needed on the whole fleet as happened with HEX)


Agreed. The idea of a split fleet for what was essentially the LTV (London [and] Thames Valley) outer suburban services and the branches (inner suburban is going to Crossrail) seemed a bit daft to me. Also LTV will still be retaining some turbo units for the Marlow branch and Gatwick services, as well as a Didcot-Oxford stopping shuttle until Oxford is wired.


Would I be right in saying that 387s are dual equipped - overhead and 3rd rail - so that (for example) the outer suburban services could be  diverted into Waterloo if there was a problem between Paddington and Reading?

I think from the pictures I've seen that they are (there are clearly collector shoe beams on the driving car bogies), but I'm not expert on that. Any diversion into Waterloo would require the creation of a 25kV AC/750V DC (Direct Current) interface at Reading New Junction on the connection with the down main or on the eastern underpass.
Logged
DidcotPunter
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 166


View Profile Email
« Reply #271 on: June 09, 2016, 10:34:08 »


Assuming that all comes to pass then it is an improved situation on what was already quite a good deal for GWR (Great Western Railway) passengers:

As you say, the AT300's will allow the through Bedwyn services to continue - though I have a feeling that many will continue to Westbury or beyond - which was really awkward if Newbury to Bedwyn diesel shuttles had needed to be retained as originally planned.  The turnback at Bedwyn will need to be extended to accomodate a 5-car Hitachi unit.

The more trains with 125mph capability on the main lines the better, and with an all-new fleet of Class 387 and none of the much older Class 365s the eastern end of the GWR routes will have the most modern fleet in the country.  Most welcome news for passengers and staff.

I suspect the DfT is taking a bit of a hammering financially to make all this possible, due to the electrification delays!

Indeed, if this now happens it will be excellent news for passengers and staff. A silver lining in the cloud surrounding the electrification delays.

You're not the only one suggesting the Bedwyn services might be extended to Westbury. Provided there are the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.)/AT300 units available this would be a sensible idea. Good connections at Westbury for passengers travelling west of Newbury and also might provide Pewsey with a decent service for the first time in living memory.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #272 on: June 09, 2016, 11:03:03 »

Yes indeed.  It's only really the historical reasons of the old Network SouthEast border being at Bedwyn, and DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard))/CSR (Cab Secure Radio) equipment not being fitted beyond Bedwyn that stopped the Turbo trains ever getting there.  It was mooted a few times over the years but never happened.

You might need to find two extra units to work the service, but with that you would get much better service resilience.  At the moment there is just seven minutes between arriving at Bedwyn from Paddington, doing the shunt to the other platform and then departing for London, so if a train from London arrives late, it departs late back to London! 

Connections west from Newbury and Hungerford would be massively improved, as would the service at Westbury and especially Pewsey.  One for the timetable planners hopefully...  Smiley
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #273 on: June 09, 2016, 13:08:42 »

As they're new build for GWR (Great Western Railway), I doubt it's included in the spec....but does anyone *know* for sure?

The pictures of GW (Great Western) liveried units from the follow on batch of 8 show that they have pickup shoes, but that doesn't mean the rest will.  But fitting shoes to a modern EMU (Electric Multiple Unit) is a fairly trivial matter, because they all have a DC (Direct Current) stage in their traction power system.   Whether or not they come fitted would not prevent them being so fitted in future, if some cunning plan required then to run on DC lines somewhere near Reading for instance.

Paul
Logged
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 514


View Profile
« Reply #274 on: June 09, 2016, 13:11:58 »

Yes indeed.  It's only really the historical reasons of the old Network SouthEast border being at Bedwyn, and DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard))/CSR (Cab Secure Radio) equipment not being fitted beyond Bedwyn that stopped the Turbo trains ever getting there.  It was mooted a few times over the years but never happened.

You might need to find two extra units to work the service, but with that you would get much better service resilience.  At the moment there is just seven minutes between arriving at Bedwyn from Paddington, doing the shunt to the other platform and then departing for London, so if a train from London arrives late, it departs late back to London! 

Connections west from Newbury and Hungerford would be massively improved, as would the service at Westbury and especially Pewsey.  One for the timetable planners hopefully...  Smiley

Don't forget also that the current Under Secretary of State for Transport just happens to be MP (Member of Parliament) for Devizes, which covers Pewsey IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly), not to mention that an awful lot of other constituencies elected Tory MPs at the last election.

I was also reminded this morning that the MP for Derbyshire Dales (i.e. the bit north of Derby) is Secretary of State for Transport. Can't have done much harm when it came to orders being sent Bombardier's way, particularly as Derby North is a pretty marginal seat (and even Derby South might be winnable if Margaret Beckett should step down).

AFAIK (as far as I know), pick-up shoes are generally fitted at manufacture to allow acceptance testing, then if not required, removed to facilitate maintenance, avoid damage from obstructions etc. But ultimately, the ROSCO» (Rolling Stock Owning Company - about) owns a dual-voltage EMU (Electric Multiple Unit) that can be redeployed to a TOC (Train Operating Company) where the shoegear is required.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #275 on: June 09, 2016, 13:18:34 »

AFAIK (as far as I know), pick-up shoes are generally fitted at manufacture to allow acceptance testing, then if not required, removed to facilitate maintenance, avoid damage from obstructions etc.
Or in the case of the LM (London Midland - recent franchise) 350/1s they simply run around with their shoe gear permanently in the raised position, where it can't be seen behind the shoe beam unless you get down really low.

Paul
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #276 on: June 09, 2016, 19:20:19 »

Yes indeed.  It's only really the historical reasons of the old Network SouthEast border being at Bedwyn, and DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard))/CSR (Cab Secure Radio) equipment not being fitted beyond Bedwyn that stopped the Turbo trains ever getting there.  It was mooted a few times over the years but never happened.

You might need to find two extra units to work the service, but with that you would get much better service resilience.  At the moment there is just seven minutes between arriving at Bedwyn from Paddington, doing the shunt to the other platform and then departing for London, so if a train from London arrives late, it departs late back to London! 

Connections west from Newbury and Hungerford would be massively improved, as would the service at Westbury and especially Pewsey.  One for the timetable planners hopefully...  Smiley

There have been various ideas mooted over the years.    A suggestion to extend to Westbury on existing stock levels, halving frequency west of Newbury, went down like a lead balloon.   Ideas of skipping stops alternately at Kintbury and Bedwyn were equally unpopular.   And a service needing more trains didn't sit too well with the people who have to sanction and pay for the hire of trains. People at Pewsey are less than enamoured by the current service with just a handful of stops being replaced by something that takes quite a bit longer and provides largely unwanted journey opportunities like Pewsey to Midgham, and people at Westbury have similar concern together with a worry that they'll loose service heading to The West as a result.

Anyone who can solve all that lot is - in my view - a genius!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #277 on: June 10, 2016, 22:25:08 »

Yes indeed.  It's only really the historical reasons of the old Network SouthEast border being at Bedwyn, and DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard))/CSR (Cab Secure Radio) equipment not being fitted beyond Bedwyn that stopped the Turbo trains ever getting there.  It was mooted a few times over the years but never happened.

You might need to find two extra units to work the service, but with that you would get much better service resilience.  At the moment there is just seven minutes between arriving at Bedwyn from Paddington, doing the shunt to the other platform and then departing for London, so if a train from London arrives late, it departs late back to London! 

Connections west from Newbury and Hungerford would be massively improved, as would the service at Westbury and especially Pewsey.  One for the timetable planners hopefully...  Smiley

There have been various ideas mooted over the years.    A suggestion to extend to Westbury on existing stock levels, halving frequency west of Newbury, went down like a lead balloon.   Ideas of skipping stops alternately at Kintbury and Bedwyn were equally unpopular.   And a service needing more trains didn't sit too well with the people who have to sanction and pay for the hire of trains. People at Pewsey are less than enamoured by the current service with just a handful of stops being replaced by something that takes quite a bit longer and provides largely unwanted journey opportunities like Pewsey to Midgham, and people at Westbury have similar concern together with a worry that they'll loose service heading to The West as a result.

Anyone who can solve all that lot is - in my view - a genius!

Future electrification to places like Westbury will have to be in part if not wholly locally sourced, some of it may come from central Government but the new funding model for NR» (Network Rail - home page) means if a Local Authority wants an enhanced railway service in their area they can no longer demand its done.
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #278 on: June 12, 2016, 13:25:04 »

It has been mooted that the 387s will start running from 5th September. I notice on the train feeds they are down as running from the 1st August (Although of course these may not have been updated yet)
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/C44181/2016/08/01/advanced
Quote
WTT (Working Time-Table) schedule UID C44181, identity 2S07
Runs SSuX between 01/08/2016 to 09/12/2016


On the other hand perhaps training begins on the 1st August as there are a handful of ECS (Empty Coaching Stock) movements to/from Airport Junction also scheduled.
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/C58622/2016/08/01/advanced
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3457

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #279 on: June 12, 2016, 20:50:48 »

It has been mooted that the 387s will start running from 5th September. I notice on the train feeds they are down as running from the 1st August (Although of course these may not have been updated yet)
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/C44181/2016/08/01/advanced
Quote
WTT (Working Time-Table) schedule UID C44181, identity 2S07
Runs SSuX between 01/08/2016 to 09/12/2016


That one says 165/6 DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit)


Pathed as Class 165/1 or 166 (Turbo) DMU
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #280 on: June 12, 2016, 21:19:41 »

Quote
Pathed as Class 165/1 or 166 (Turbo) DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit)

They all do, same as the ones that were due to start in May, they are all pathed as 165/166 as the timings/speed will be the same.

If you follow the diagrams from the beginning to the end of the day they start/finish at North Pole, which is where the 387s will initially be based
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #281 on: June 13, 2016, 11:28:05 »

Yes, the pathing type can be completely different from the actual planned traction.  For example many of Chiltern's services are pathed as Class 158s (when they haven't got any!), and many of the Northern Electric services operated by Class 319s are still pathed for the old DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit)'s that used to operate them.

I should imagine the initial services are driver training runs, though there's still no deal in place for the training programme I hear that outstanding issues are pretty much resolved now.
« Last Edit: June 13, 2016, 13:25:29 by IndustryInsider » Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #282 on: July 08, 2016, 00:47:39 »

The first GW (Great Western) unit, 387130, has been reported tonight as being delivered to Bletchley depot for its period of main line test running.

A successful couple of weeks at the temporary base should then see it arrive with GWR (Great Western Railway).

Paul
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #283 on: July 08, 2016, 11:14:03 »

A training deal with the unions and GWR (Great Western Railway) is still not signed off, but 'close', so hopefully trains will be in place and drivers able to learn them (Paddington LTV (London [and] Thames Valley) depot first), so that the September date for the shuttle service can be achieved.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #284 on: July 14, 2016, 19:46:03 »

Video of the initial two 387/1 on test passing through Purley:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FR-eWZZHC8M

Pictures of the pair at Brighton on mackenzieblu's flickr, there are some interior shots there as well:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/mackenzieblu/28304081315/in/photostream/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/mackenzieblu/28270406996/in/photostream/

Hope this is of interest.

Paul

Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 63
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page