Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:35 29 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
10:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 09:42:27 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[64] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[59] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[58] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[52] Return of the BRUTE?
[36] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 63
  Print  
Author Topic: Class 387 coming to Thames Valley - ongoing discussion  (Read 459808 times)
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #480 on: April 13, 2017, 21:23:15 »

Could you clarify what the ride height is please?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #481 on: April 14, 2017, 11:01:23 »

Could you clarify what the ride height is please?

I think in this context the entire body of the train is being raised by a few cm with respect to the 'as designed' condition.  A while back they were talking about fitting various shims between the bogies and the vehicle body, basically packing out the suspension.

This therefore provides additional gauge clearance at some platform edges on the route.   It presumably also means that some units will not easily couple with others.

Paul

Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #482 on: April 14, 2017, 19:12:07 »

Could you clarify what the ride height is please?

I think in this context the entire body of the train is being raised by a few cm with respect to the 'as designed' condition.  A while back they were talking about fitting various shims between the bogies and the vehicle body, basically packing out the suspension.

This therefore provides additional gauge clearance at some platform edges on the route.   It presumably also means that some units will not easily couple with others.

Paul



yes that correct, I don't believe it effects the coupling of two units as the height increase is not that much
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #483 on: May 05, 2017, 18:34:03 »

Travelled on my first Class 387 today (05/05/2017).  Quite impressed with the quality and finish and the quiteness of the ride.  One comment is that the passengers on the 8 coach service could have all been squeezed into a single coach... Roll Eyes Tongue
Logged
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #484 on: May 06, 2017, 09:23:30 »

Squeezing passengers in to the shortest possible train is not compulsory, although it does seem to be a feature of modern train travel!
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #485 on: May 06, 2017, 09:50:11 »

I've always thought it odd that most modern suburban/provincial DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) are 2 and 3 car whilst non IC (Inter City) (intercity) EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) all seem to be all 4 or more cars.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #486 on: May 06, 2017, 10:31:19 »

I've always thought it odd that most modern suburban/provincial DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) are 2 and 3 car whilst non IC (Inter City) (intercity) EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) all seem to be all 4 or more cars.

A couple of theories, the easier being that the more heavily trafficked routes are more likely to have been electrified, so can therefore justify the longer rolling stock.

However, I suspect it is more complex than that.  All other things being equal, a mix of 2 and 3 car trains on a route enables a close tailoring of demand in that you can have any length of train from 2 onwards.  For diesels, other than the additional cost of the cabs, there isn't much difference in the cost, as every coach is powered.  However, for emus, the traction equipment is one per train, so (as an example), 2 x 2 car sets costs a lot more than 1 x 4 car set, and would be overpowered. Therefore the balance swings more to having longer trains with fewer sets. 
Logged
dviner
Full Member
***
Posts: 82


View Profile
« Reply #487 on: May 06, 2017, 13:08:02 »

However, I suspect it is more complex than that.  All other things being equal, a mix of 2 and 3 car trains on a route enables a close tailoring of demand in that you can have any length of train from 2 onwards.  For diesels, other than the additional cost of the cabs, there isn't much difference in the cost, as every coach is powered.  However, for emus, the traction equipment is one per train, so (as an example), 2 x 2 car sets costs a lot more than 1 x 4 car set, and would be overpowered. Therefore the balance swings more to having longer trains with fewer sets. 

Modern 2-car EMU (Electric Multiple Unit) sets are such a rarity that the electrification of the Marlow Branch is pretty much dead in the water.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #488 on: May 06, 2017, 14:19:03 »

It's a pity the 2 car 309s were scrapped although they would be grossly overpowered for the Marlow branch. Unless of course sunless there's a Barry for redundant EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit).
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40691



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #489 on: May 06, 2017, 15:10:59 »

Unless of course sunless there's a Barry for redundant EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit).

How about a Bourne End to Marlow shuttle using stock from:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preserved_EMUs_of_Southern_Railway
and there are also electric trains being converted - some as 2 coach units - to diesels:
http://vivarail.co.uk/vivarail-news/
and in due course there may be some vintage 2 coach units available from elsewhere:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-35495934

... then extend the London - Maidenhead electric serve that starts in July to Bourne End  Grin

There is a real need to be able to run heritage EMUs ... but so much extra complexity is involved as soon as any heritage operation starts to share with main line certified stuff.  Is there space at Marlow for a depot building?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #490 on: May 06, 2017, 17:20:46 »

If and currently its a big if the Maidenhead / Bourne gets electrified, or indeed any of the TV branches.   The 387 are through corridor between units so with the use of SDO (Selective Door Opening) it would be feasible to run an 8 car unit Maidenhead / Bourne End, or do a 8 to 4 spilt at Maidenhead, but given in Crossrail mode there are no TV branches to Padd through services.  I believe the current pattern morning peaks of a 2 car 165 Bourne End Marlow and a 3 car 165/6 Maidenhead Bourne End with evening being a 2 car 165 Maidenhead Bourne perhaps a 3 car 165 is set in stone now for many years to come.

There is no funding at the moment for the TV branches to be wired, especially as Didcot / Oxford electrification is deferred

The biggest problem with the Bourne End Marlow line is the cost of altering the track work and platform extension at Bourne End to accommodate a 4 car unit.  It is unlikely the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) or TOC (Train Operating Company) would want to have a few odd 2 car units.

Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #491 on: May 20, 2017, 09:19:55 »

My understanding from folks I know in the project the final hurdle to run electric passenger services to Maidenhead has been signed of by the Office of Rail & Road.

Other than a major hic up the first electric passenger service will depart Maidenhead as timetabled
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #492 on: May 20, 2017, 12:02:50 »

The first 'real' tangible benefits of electrification should be felt from Monday onwards.  I put real in brackets because the Hayes shuttles ran on (modified) existing infrastructure.

I'll be very interested to hear the thoughts of those who are set to benefit from next week onwards.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #493 on: May 20, 2017, 20:33:48 »

The first 'real' tangible benefits of electrification should be felt from Monday onwards.  I put real in brackets because the Hayes shuttles ran on (modified) existing infrastructure.

I'll be very interested to hear the thoughts of those who are set to benefit from next week onwards.

There are limitations to the service that can be run, Kensal Green Feeder Station I understand has not been signed into use; this means all  electric (OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE")) services out of Padd will have to rely on the original OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) Feeder Station which is planned to be decommissioned when Kensal EIS (Enters Into Service) (EIS Enters Into Service)
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #494 on: May 20, 2017, 21:37:06 »

'EIS (Enters Into Service)' now 'enters into service' in the Coffee Shop forum's acronyms pageWink

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 63
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page