Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:55 19 Apr 2024
* Some Wales roads to revert to 30mph after backlash
* BBC presenter reports racist abuse on London train
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:18 London Paddington to Swansea
21:02 Oxford to London Paddington
22:18 London Paddington to Oxford
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2024, 22:09:50 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[294] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[103] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[61] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[54] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[26] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
[25] Signage - not making it easy ...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 ... 63
  Print  
Author Topic: Class 387 coming to Thames Valley - ongoing discussion  (Read 461787 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17876


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #525 on: June 07, 2017, 22:52:53 »

Thanks for your observations, IndustryInsider.  Wink

Press coverage of this particular service improvement was probably muted, due to other events in the news, in Manchester and at London Bridge, for example - and in the lead up to the general election.  And it was / is half term week. Roll Eyes

We'll perhaps see how things really develop from next week onwards.  Wink

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #526 on: June 08, 2017, 10:14:51 »

Another disappointing morning of delays and cancellations on arrivals at Paddington and the other GWR (Great Western Railway) routes, though rather surprisingly the Maidenhead/Slough electrics managed to avoid getting caught up, with everything arriving (as an 8-car) within PPM(resolve) charter except 2S80, 09:09 PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-SLO which arrived 6 minutes late.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1248



View Profile
« Reply #527 on: June 08, 2017, 11:27:11 »

A quick question for II re Maidenhead signalling with the new layout for 387s et al. if I may?

On the Down Main there are now four diverging routes available from signal 569 (in addition to the Down Main itself): platforms 2 through 5 – Platform 2 being the new addition.  How is this route signalled?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #528 on: June 08, 2017, 13:37:08 »

The route to platform 2 is signalled from 569 signal with an 'X' in a theatre box and no junction indicator.  As it's for reversing movements only I guess they wanted to make it distinctive.  Platforms 3,4 and 5 are indicated by the more standard Junction indicators 4,5 and 6.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1248



View Profile
« Reply #529 on: June 08, 2017, 13:53:09 »

Thanks II.  That explains the theatre box I saw passing slowly through - and looking back - on the Up Main this morning.
Logged
W5tRailfinder
Full Member
***
Posts: 43


View Profile
« Reply #530 on: June 08, 2017, 15:12:35 »

Another quick question for II regarding signalling at Maidenhead.

Is signal 575 at west end of platform 2 a fixed red?

If it is I'll report it to Open Train Times as such.

I'll also report dodgy signal-berth 1616 and a few incorrect route settings on the same map as well. 
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #531 on: June 08, 2017, 15:43:10 »

Yes it is.  So is 564 on the down main in the up direction to the east of Maidenhead.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #532 on: June 08, 2017, 16:35:32 »

The route to platform 2 is signalled from 569 signal with an 'X' in a theatre box and no junction indicator.  As it's for reversing movements only I guess they wanted to make it distinctive.  Platforms 3,4 and 5 are indicated by the more standard Junction indicators 4,5 and 6.
Just to add to this information posted by II.  An 'X' indication usually applies to a limit of shunt or nominally wrong direction movement exit signal.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #533 on: June 08, 2017, 23:00:42 »

Another disappointing morning of delays and cancellations on arrivals at Paddington and the other GWR (Great Western Railway) routes, though rather surprisingly the Maidenhead/Slough electrics managed to avoid getting caught up, with everything arriving (as an 8-car) within PPM(resolve) charter except 2S80, 09:09 PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-SLO which arrived 6 minutes late.

All 'on time' tonight as well, thought he 16:42 and 18:42 PAD-MAI (Maidenhead station) were both cancelled due to a driver shortage - both trains being on the same diagram.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #534 on: June 09, 2017, 11:06:04 »

All Slough/Maidenhead 387s reached their destination within the PPM(resolve) this morning, indeed all were either early or on time apart from the 09:09 PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-SLO which arrived three minutes late.

It was an exceptional morning peak all round with many of the sectors reaching the magical 100% PPM.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7794



View Profile
« Reply #535 on: June 09, 2017, 11:51:55 »

Another disappointing morning of delays and cancellations on arrivals at Paddington and the other GWR (Great Western Railway) routes, though rather surprisingly the Maidenhead/Slough electrics managed to avoid getting caught up, with everything arriving (as an 8-car) within PPM(resolve) charter except 2S80, 09:09 PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-SLO which arrived 6 minutes late.

All 'on time' tonight as well, thought he 16:42 and 18:42 PAD-MAI (Maidenhead station) were both cancelled due to a driver shortage - both trains being on the same diagram.

......so all "on time"......apart from the ones which were cancelled! 😂.......driver shortage seems to be a growing issue at the moment and not just at the weekend when we're used to it.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #536 on: June 09, 2017, 11:59:26 »

Yes, that's right TG.  And driver shortages are a growing problem currently, though 387 training is currently going at quite a pace there are way too many trains being cancelled company wide for my liking.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #537 on: June 09, 2017, 13:31:44 »

The route to platform 2 is signalled from 569 signal with an 'X' in a theatre box and no junction indicator.  As it's for reversing movements only I guess they wanted to make it distinctive.  Platforms 3,4 and 5 are indicated by the more standard Junction indicators 4,5 and 6.
Just to add to this information posted by II.  An 'X' indication usually applies to a limit of shunt or nominally wrong direction movement exit signal.

And I suppose I should've used the correct terminology of Standard Route Indicator instead of the rather old fashioned theatre box!  Wink
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #538 on: June 09, 2017, 16:12:37 »

The route to platform 2 is signalled from 569 signal with an 'X' in a theatre box and no junction indicator.  As it's for reversing movements only I guess they wanted to make it distinctive.  Platforms 3,4 and 5 are indicated by the more standard Junction indicators 4,5 and 6.
Just to add to this information posted by II.  An 'X' indication usually applies to a limit of shunt or nominally wrong direction movement exit signal.

And I suppose I should've used the correct terminology of Standard Route Indicator instead of the rather old fashioned theatre box!  Wink

....CfN is going to hate me, but two more abbreviations to add to the Acronyms and other Abbreviations page Tongue:

MARI (Miniature Alphanumeric Route Indicator) = Miniature Alphanumeric Route Indicator

SARI = Standard Alphanumeric Route Indicator

A MARI is usually associated with a shunting signal or with subsidiary aspects (e.g. Calling On) on a main running signal

A SARI is usually associated with a main running aspect on a main signal

Like all things on the MDTR, caution is required as there is always the odd exception to the golden rule..... Roll Eyes
« Last Edit: June 09, 2017, 21:19:37 by SandTEngineer » Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #539 on: June 09, 2017, 18:28:11 »

With regards to the signal we were discussing, there's a MARI (Miniature Alphanumeric Route Indicator) on the signal adjacent to that one with it's SARI.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 ... 63
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page