Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
Read about the forum [here].
Register and contribute [here] - it's free.
article index - [here]
 today - First Group Shareholder mtg
today - Leaflets at MKM Station
tomorrow - TransWilts Stakeholder Conf.
29/06/2019 - Melksham Carnival
29/06/2019 - Dawlish, last local NR meeting
30/06/2019 - Reading Buses OPen Day
Random Image
Train Running @GWR Twitter Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail news GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4 Chat on off
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
June 25, 2019, 07:40:34 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[108] Bristol Temple Meads Station redevelopment
[49] Melksham Rail User Group - summer campaign about to launch
[46] 2019 - TransWilts cancellation and amendments log
[44] Adding doggy tails together
[44] Eurostar goes almost dry
[42] The rail replacement bus that did not operate
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 61 62 [63]
  Print  
Author Topic: Class 387 coming to Thames Valley - ongoing discussion  (Read 318837 times)
IndustryInsider
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7270


View Profile
« Reply #930 on: June 20, 2019, 09:35:38 pm »


Is there a good reason why 1R06, the 1757 Paddington to Reading is/was still a turbo, today Thursday 20 June?

My wife was not impressed with my  praise of electrification, as we passed countless new EMU's both Crossrail and 387's, quietly vegetating in sidings along the way of our cramped noisy unit.

Basically the odd Turbo operated services cover for 387s away for the Heathrow Air conversions. 

Very few 387s are left loitering in sidings throughout the peak times, you may have spotted a 12-car formation in West Ealing sidings, but that comes out at 18:18 empty to Paddington to form the 18:42 to Reading, so they're not vegetating.
Logged

To view my cab run over the new Reading Viaduct as well as a relief line cab ride at Reading just after Platforms 12-15 opened and my 'before and after' video comparison of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/1
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3242


View Profile
« Reply #931 on: June 20, 2019, 10:10:51 pm »

Basically the odd Turbo operated services cover for 387s away for the Heathrow Air conversions. 

But I thought the 387's going to Heathrow services were surplus because of extra 800's?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7270


View Profile
« Reply #932 on: June 20, 2019, 10:26:30 pm »

Basically the odd Turbo operated services cover for 387s away for the Heathrow Air conversions. 

But I thought the 387's going to Heathrow services were surplus because of extra 800's?

In a roundabout way they are.  The 17:18 Oxford used to be a 6-car Turbo and is now an IET.  The 17:57 to Reading used to be a 387 and is now a 6-car Turbo.  Net result two 387 trains can be released for conversion.  Come December, both the IET and Turbo probably won't be needed for those diagrams as the 17:57 (and many others) will be operated by TfL Rail and the equivalent to the 17:18 can then become a 12-car 387.
Logged

To view my cab run over the new Reading Viaduct as well as a relief line cab ride at Reading just after Platforms 12-15 opened and my 'before and after' video comparison of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/1
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 670


View Profile
« Reply #933 on: June 20, 2019, 11:11:21 pm »


 The 17:57 to Reading used to be a 387 and is now a 6-car Turbo. 


There were very many 345's quietly enjoying the sunshine.

OTC
Logged
IndustryInsider
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7270


View Profile
« Reply #934 on: June 20, 2019, 11:42:26 pm »

Well...yes, there would be.
Logged

To view my cab run over the new Reading Viaduct as well as a relief line cab ride at Reading just after Platforms 12-15 opened and my 'before and after' video comparison of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/1
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 670


View Profile
« Reply #935 on: June 21, 2019, 09:15:41 am »


Pardon my naivety but if the 1757 can be operated with a 345 in December, why not in June? I'm sure that our fellows further West would appreciate those two Turbo's throughout the Summer months. Aren't the 345's in use out of Liverpool St?

Perhaps TOC's need fining for working diesels wholly under the wires - but its probably DfT's fault ultimately.

OTC
Logged
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 314


View Profile
« Reply #936 on: Today at 05:21:45 pm »


Pardon my naivety but if the 1757 can be operated with a 345 in December, why not in June? I'm sure that our fellows further West would appreciate those two Turbo's throughout the Summer months. Aren't the 345's in use out of Liverpool St?

Perhaps TOC's need fining for working diesels wholly under the wires - but its probably DfT's fault ultimately.

OTC

Because the 345's, their crews and their maintenance facilites are all part of TfL rail. GWR are contracted to have the job, crew it and take the revenue until Dec 2019.

It probably could be sorted if there was a massive issue, like a fleet-wide fault was found and the 387s all had to be pulled from service. But there doesn't really seem to be a compelling argument in the meantime.   

Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 61 62 [63]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page