Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:55 28 Mar 2024
- Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 16:13:13 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Poll
Question: Would you welcome new class 278 trains?  (Voting closed: December 03, 2014, 11:21:24)
Yes, they would be good on my line - 4 (7%)
Yes, if it meant more capacity - 16 (28.1%)
Yes, if it meant more services - 12 (21.1%)
Yes, in the right places - 15 (26.3%)
Yes, but not on my line - 4 (7%)
No - 6 (10.5%)
Total Voters: 28

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 14
  Print  
Author Topic: New trains from old?  (Read 86333 times)
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: December 04, 2014, 12:08:04 »

Given his early career was spent at English Electric I don't think you should assume that he writes from a position of ignorance on the subject.


Ford trained as a mechanical engineer with English Electric at Rugby, specialising in prime movers, and on qualification joined the head office of the company^s Traction Division. While at English Electric Traction he was seconded to the Maintenance Division, spending time at Finsbury Park and Stratford locomotive depots.
(source - Wikipedia)
Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: December 04, 2014, 12:25:51 »

Given his early career was spent at English Electric I don't think you should assume that he writes from a position of ignorance on the subject.


Ford trained as a mechanical engineer with English Electric at Rugby, specialising in prime movers, and on qualification joined the head office of the company^s Traction Division. While at English Electric Traction he was seconded to the Maintenance Division, spending time at Finsbury Park and Stratford locomotive depots.
(source - Wikipedia)

I wasn't making assumptions he was ignorant, merely stating my surprise that he is of that opinion given that we've had 60+ years of generally successful use of marine & road derived diesel engines in rail applications. Indeed, most of the large EE engines of the modernisation era were marine derived. Given his background with EE, it surprises me even more that he is of the opinion that there are no road derived diesel engines currently available that would be suitable for this application.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: December 04, 2014, 22:43:02 »

Having read Roger Ford's articles for many years and heard the respect with which he is held within the industry I put my money on his judgement.  However, if you read the article, he does respect those involved in the project, so he does not totally dismiss the possibility that it might work. He just remains to be convinced that a transit van engine is up to the vibration that comes from steel wheel on steel rail. 
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #18 on: December 17, 2014, 14:14:05 »

http://www.transportxtra.com/magazines/local_transport_today/news/?ID=40073

Quote
A rolling stock engineering firm says it has reached agreement with Transport for London to purchase surplus District Line trains, with the intention of converting them to diesel power so they can replace ageing and unpopular Pacer and Sprinter units running on many provincial lines in Britain, writes John W E Helm.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: December 17, 2014, 18:28:12 »

I think i'd rather travel on a 14x than D stock!!
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: December 17, 2014, 19:49:23 »

If you want to see Vivarail's own case for the "D-train", it's here - with that Roger Ford article too.

Perhaps I should add - that's only a simple glossy web-site spiel, not the 43-page technical brochure.
« Last Edit: December 17, 2014, 20:27:37 by stuving » Logged
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: December 18, 2014, 06:57:38 »

I think it's a great idea if I'm honest. Eversholt refurbished a Class 321 which I had the pleasure of traveling on a while back. The refurbishment was very well done and as a layman I would easily have thought it was a brand new train. Windows were nice and wide, lighting was good, felt alot more open and spacious.
Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: December 18, 2014, 11:13:48 »


I think that the logic is as follows:

The lease cost per annum of a rail passenger carriage is in the range ^75k - ^150k of which about 1/3 is for capital - the rest being heavy maintenance. Thus the "rent" proper is ^25k - ^50k. If you could get this for ten years, after interest the capital value (NPV) would be ^200k - ^400k. You can buy a seviceable but scrap carriage for ^5k - ^10k. As this would be a bogie vehicle it would have a value towards the higher end. Put in ^100k  per car and you double your money or more.

Good luck to Adrian Shooter and Vivarail.

The figures are around if anyone wants to check.

OTC
Logged
Network SouthEast
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 492



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: December 18, 2014, 11:42:56 »

I think that the Vivarail proposed D-Train might have a chance, but only if they can bring this to market quickly.

I think the biggest enemy of Vivarail is not their proposed technology, but time.

We're seeing a massive programme of electrification. Network Rail in their Route Studies are now outlining possible future electrification projects beyond 2019. In the next five years we are going to see a large surplus of DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) stock from the Transpennie, Thames Valley, North West, Electric Spine and Central Scotland electrification schemes.

So the D-Train will be competing against tried and tested rolling stock. Some of it (in the case of the 185s) barely a decade old.

The cost of conversion will need to be low. The leasing companies will expect a Section 54 Undertaking to spend any money financing the D-Train, and will the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) really be in the mood for this?

Well there are currently 156 Pacers in service. So even with a large cascade and electrification there might be a need for the D-Train.

For it to work, they'll need to be able to do the conversions sooner rather than later, and the cost needs to have as short a pay back period as possible.

Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: December 18, 2014, 12:20:10 »

I think that the Vivarail proposed D-Train might have a chance, but only if they can bring this to market quickly.

I think the biggest enemy of Vivarail is not their proposed technology, but time.

We're seeing a massive programme of electrification. Network Rail in their Route Studies are now outlining possible future electrification projects beyond 2019. In the next five years we are going to see a large surplus of DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) stock from the Transpennie, Thames Valley, North West, Electric Spine and Central Scotland electrification schemes.

So the D-Train will be competing against tried and tested rolling stock. Some of it (in the case of the 185s) barely a decade old.

The cost of conversion will need to be low. The leasing companies will expect a Section 54 Undertaking to spend any money financing the D-Train, and will the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) really be in the mood for this?

Well there are currently 156 Pacers in service. So even with a large cascade and electrification there might be a need for the D-Train.

For it to work, they'll need to be able to do the conversions sooner rather than later, and the cost needs to have as short a pay back period as possible.



There is, of course, the potential for these re-engineered units to be marketed internationally, which I'm sure this company will have given due consideration to if there is a limited potential lifespan in the UK (United Kingdom).

An interesting project if it comes to fruition, and goes very much against recent trends of scrapping/exporting relatively young rolling stock rather then refurbishing or re-engineering.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: December 18, 2014, 23:37:36 »


I think that the logic is as follows:

The lease cost per annum of a rail passenger carriage is in the range ^75k - ^150k of which about 1/3 is for capital - the rest being heavy maintenance. Thus the "rent" proper is ^25k - ^50k. If you could get this for ten years, after interest the capital value (NPV) would be ^200k - ^400k. You can buy a seviceable but scrap carriage for ^5k - ^10k. As this would be a bogie vehicle it would have a value towards the higher end. Put in ^100k  per car and you double your money or more.

Good luck to Adrian Shooter and Vivarail.

The figures are around if anyone wants to check.

OTC

I'm not even an armchair accountant, but I see the issues here through the eyes of an armchair layman. There is a parallel with aviation. Budget airlines operating in the UK (United Kingdom) - I shall not name whom I have in mind, but one came from Ireland, and the other is easy to guess - began operations with basically hand-me-down Boeing 737s. They now use the latest Airbus models, and I returned from my tan-topping sojourn to Tenerife last month on easyPeasy's (whoops! nearly gave the game away!) latest A320, only a month off the production line. These operators see the value of leasing new energy efficient aircraft, in the same way that I first bought a 15-year old Mini in 1978 and now drive a year old (bought new) Nissan. My first car did about half the mpg of my current, carried less, and necessitated me spending my weekends under the bonnet with a Haynes manual, trying to figure out what was wrong. I drove without brakes for a week, which was interesting, until I could get the piston repair kit, fit it, and bleed it. In the unlikely event of my brakes failing now, I would call the RAC (complimentary), have the car towed to my local dealer, and have the fault repaired under warranty, FOC (Freight Operating Company).

Like RyanAir any Irish airline would do. Cheap is not necessarily the least expensive, and your accountant will tell a pretty story to suit the taxman, your investors, and the missus if need be.
Logged

Now, please!
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: December 19, 2014, 00:24:31 »

Say what you like about mpg, but spending a Sunday under the bonnet of a BMC Mini, referring back and forth to a Haynes Manual, is far more enjoyable than T-cutting a Nissan Micra.

Did both recently. Gettng the Mini to splutter into life was far more enjoyable than being able to see my reflection in the bonnet of Mum's Micra.

Sorry, I digress. D stock with strap on Diesels on the national network? No thanks.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: December 19, 2014, 11:06:48 »



Sorry, I digress. D stock with strap on Diesels on the national network? No thanks.

I agree.  And I don't buy the economics here either.  I understand is that their is a reluctance to invest in diesel units because future electrification might make them redundant before their full life, but if the economics make sense for converting D-stock to diesel, then the economics ought to make sense for converting a diesel to electric mid-way through its life.   
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: December 19, 2014, 15:22:38 »

Say what you like about mpg, but spending a Sunday under the bonnet of a BMC Mini, referring back and forth to a Haynes Manual, is far more enjoyable than T-cutting a Nissan Micra.


The difference is between hobby and necessity.
Logged

Now, please!
Surrey 455
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1229


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: December 20, 2014, 10:59:24 »

Budget airlines operating in the UK (United Kingdom) - I shall not name whom I have in mind, but one came from Ireland, and the other is easy to guess - began operations with basically hand-me-down Boeing 737s. They now use the latest Airbus models......

easyJet exclusively use Airbus planes, Ryanair exclusively use Boeing planes. By sticking to one manufacturer their maintenance costs are lower apparently.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 14
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page