Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 06:55 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
06:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
07:00 Bedwyn to Newbury
07:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
07:49 Bedwyn to Newbury
08:13 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:23 Hereford to London Paddington
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 Bedwyn to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
07:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
07:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 06:56:21 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[82] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[76] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[74] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[67] Return of the BRUTE?
[57] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 42 43 [44] 45 46 ... 63
  Print  
Author Topic: Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onwards  (Read 315018 times)
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9810



View Profile
« Reply #645 on: April 03, 2019, 15:07:40 »

Flybe now fly NQY (Newquay (Station))-LHR daily. A 1 hr 20 min flight landing at 0830.....the convenience & speed of this option will hoover up a lot of Cornish customers who previously may have used the sleeper. Problems like this one will drive even more people away from the train & onto the plane

Except on Sunday they didn't and put everyone on a coach to Heathrow.  Works both ways.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #646 on: April 03, 2019, 15:14:07 »

I am well aware that the proximate cause of this was an engine failure.
However such failures seem to be a common event, and a cynic might suspect that GWR (Great Western Railway) are giving a low priority to obtaining a small fleet of engines that can make the journey reliably.
A failure affecting one nights service often seems to also affect the following night, suggesting perhaps that mending the broken engine, or obtaining a substitute is not a priority.

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9810



View Profile
« Reply #647 on: April 03, 2019, 15:20:01 »

Due to the shortage of Class 57s one has been sent down from Reading and will arrive at Par shortly.  Then in an hour's time it is due to take the whole train to Plymouth.   

I assume it is easier to put the loco on the back of the train and keep the failed on the front.   However I assume some staff from Long Rock have had to be sent up to make the beds and clean the train.

The easy option of course would have been to cancel tonight's train.  Huh
« Last Edit: April 03, 2019, 16:17:00 by bobm » Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #648 on: April 03, 2019, 17:08:32 »

The easy option of course would have been to cancel tonight's train.  Huh

That would certainly have been the cynical thing to do.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #649 on: April 03, 2019, 17:28:20 »

A (probably ill-informed) thought from someone who passes the stock most working days on my commute, and sometimes see it departing for duty on the way home.

Has anyone thought about adapting one of those driving trailer coaches to put at one end, so they do not spend all the time dragging the trailing locomotive at the rear? They could then deploy the freed-up locos at strategic points on the route to provide emergency cover when (as all too often seems to be the case) there is a failure, and presumably save the fuel in hauling 100 tons plus of dead weight.

Or is that a stupid idea?
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3457

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #650 on: April 03, 2019, 20:29:38 »

Flybe now fly NQY (Newquay (Station))-LHR daily. A 1 hr 20 min flight landing at 0830.....the convenience & speed of this option will hoover up a lot of Cornish customers who previously may have used the sleeper. Problems like this one will drive even more people away from the train & onto the plane

So presumably requiring being at NQY by 0630. No public transport will get you to the airport anywhere close to that early. The first bus to the airport from Newquay is just before 0900 departing Newquay bus station, and that’s if you can get to Newquay in time for it.

Public transport links to Newquay airport is poor, but as a regular driver of 1/6 of the daily bus services from Newquay to airport I rarely drop or pick up at the airport so can see why the links are poor.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #651 on: April 03, 2019, 20:40:29 »

A (probably ill-informed) thought from someone who passes the stock most working days on my commute, and sometimes see it departing for duty on the way home.

Has anyone thought about adapting one of those driving trailer coaches to put at one end, so they do not spend all the time dragging the trailing locomotive at the rear? They could then deploy the freed-up locos at strategic points on the route to provide emergency cover when (as all too often seems to be the case) there is a failure, and presumably save the fuel in hauling 100 tons plus of dead weight.

Or is that a stupid idea?

I see no obvious flaw in the suggestion, though the coaches might need additional control cables for through control.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2257


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #652 on: April 03, 2019, 20:47:34 »

Not having been on one, I presume train horns are not seen (heard?) as a problem on night sleepers.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40691



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #653 on: April 03, 2019, 22:14:39 »

Not having been on one, I presume train horns are not seen (heard?) as a problem on night sleepers.

Ah - you have reading the "train horns wake me at night" thread.

When we ran a hotel, we heard considerable comment about elements of sleep - softness of beds, temperature, ambient light level, and sound.  And everyone is different.   We had guests who complained it was too noisy to sleep. We had other guests (no real difference on provision) who complained it was too quiet. And I should add that 99 guests out of 100 slept well!

Personally, no problem on a sleeper.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #654 on: April 03, 2019, 23:42:56 »

A (probably ill-informed) thought from someone who passes the stock most working days on my commute, and sometimes see it departing for duty on the way home.

Has anyone thought about adapting one of those driving trailer coaches to put at one end, so they do not spend all the time dragging the trailing locomotive at the rear? They could then deploy the freed-up locos at strategic points on the route to provide emergency cover when (as all too often seems to be the case) there is a failure, and presumably save the fuel in hauling 100 tons plus of dead weight.

Or is that a stupid idea?

I think you'll find that that they only drag that extra locomotive between Paddington and Reading, so as to make the reversal at the platform slicker. It is added and removed at Reading, where it quite likely does spend its time doing not a lot. If the sleeper did drag a second locomotive all the way, then of course that would be a spare, available on the spot.
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #655 on: April 04, 2019, 07:23:51 »

I am amazed that FGW (First Great Western) continue to persevere with the class 57's. With the run down of the HST (High Speed Train)'s surely GWR (Great Western Railway) could retain 6 HST power cars for haulage of the sleeper stock. It should not beyond the wit of engineers/electricians to design and fit to these power cars a 'conversion box' to convert the power/electrical supplied to the jumper cables of the sleeper stock with each item of sleep stock fitted with a conduit to carry the power car control system.

The 57's are rebuilds of the class 47's which may factually be OLDER than the oldest of the power cars being displaced.

The ROSCO» (Rolling Stock Owning Company - about)'s say all the GWR redundant HST stock is spoken for but I have not seen any posts on this forum where this stock is going except for the Scottish conversions and the 2 + 4 GWR retentions.

Still, I'm no engineer, electrician or accountant, I'm only the proverbial 'village idiot', what do I know.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #656 on: April 04, 2019, 07:44:41 »

HST (High Speed Train) power cars could be used but the sleeper stock would need modification in order to accept the electric train supply from the HSTs.
This has the merit of keeping the power cars standard and therefore interchangeable with those used on the short HST passenger sets.
Use of a power car at each end would provide "get you home redundancy" when one of them breaks.

Modifying the power cars so as to provide standard ETS (Electric Train Supply) would remove this interchangeability with the daytime passenger trains.

Or simply obtain some reliable locomotives ? It cant be that hard can it ? to obtain a few locos that can reliably make the journey, with a trailing load that is modest by freight standards, and at a speed that is modest by passenger train standards.

Use of a heavy locomotive or power car at the front of the train is arguably very slightly safer than push-pull operation with a lightweight Driving van trailer at the front.
Overnight trains are probably at slightly greater risk of striking obstructions than are most daytime services.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #657 on: April 04, 2019, 07:56:57 »

Then fit ALL GW (Great Western) power cars with the suggested 'converter box' which would then provide interchangeability, even with those going/gone to Scotland.
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #658 on: April 04, 2019, 08:04:02 »

Alternative locomotives, what has happened to all those class 67's that were redundant following the cessation of the Royal Mail rail operation and closure of the RailNet centres, they might just be more reliable than the 57's.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7747



View Profile
« Reply #659 on: April 04, 2019, 08:10:08 »

Flybe now fly NQY (Newquay (Station))-LHR daily. A 1 hr 20 min flight landing at 0830.....the convenience & speed of this option will hoover up a lot of Cornish customers who previously may have used the sleeper. Problems like this one will drive even more people away from the train & onto the plane

So presumably requiring being at NQY by 0630. No public transport will get you to the airport anywhere close to that early. The first bus to the airport from Newquay is just before 0900 departing Newquay bus station, and that’s if you can get to Newquay in time for it.

Public transport links to Newquay airport is poor, but as a regular driver of 1/6 of the daily bus services from Newquay to airport I rarely drop or pick up at the airport so can see why the links are poor.

There's a large car park with over 500 spaces. I would doubt that the target market for the early morning flight to Heathrow would be expecting to arrive by bus at that time of day, especially given the size of the catchment area.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 42 43 [44] 45 46 ... 63
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page