Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:15 19 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:18 London Paddington to Swansea
21:02 Oxford to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2024, 21:19:10 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[294] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[103] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[61] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[54] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[26] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
[25] Signage - not making it easy ...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 63
  Print  
Author Topic: Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onwards  (Read 317358 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40784



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #690 on: June 20, 2019, 04:58:14 »

And again ...

Quote
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington due 05:03
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington due 05:03 will be delayed between Freshford and Chippenham.
This is due to a problem currently under investigation.

... timetable clash on the line section that needs to be "two tracks, now!"??  Sleeper should easily make up the delay again if that guess is right.  On a scale of 1 to 10 of how much of a concern to passengers on the train, probably a 0.

Went through Melksham 5 early ... sat at Swindon for 15 minutes.   The stone empties scheduled in the opposite direction on the single line at the same time (!) went through Melksham nearly 30 minutes early, so were back on to respectable double track at Bradford Junction some 12 minutes before the sleeper passed into the bottleneck.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #691 on: August 05, 2019, 06:04:16 »

Oh dear, at 06:00 a clean JourneyCheck sheet spoiled by last nights service ;-

23:50 London Paddington to Penzance due 08:55 will be starting late from London Paddington and is expected to be 1 minute late.
This is due to congestion.

Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7794



View Profile
« Reply #692 on: August 05, 2019, 06:07:33 »

Oh dear, at 06:00 a clean JourneyCheck sheet spoiled by last nights service ;-

23:50 London Paddington to Penzance due 08:55 will be starting late from London Paddington and is expected to be 1 minute late.
This is due to congestion.



Perhaps it's intended to be ironic - "congestion" after all the space created by yesterday's cancellations!
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #693 on: August 05, 2019, 06:14:43 »

Oh dear, at 06:00 a clean JourneyCheck sheet spoiled by last nights service ;-

23:50 London Paddington to Penzance due 08:55 will be starting late from London Paddington and is expected to be 1 minute late.
This is due to congestion.
Perhaps it's intended to be ironic - "congestion" after all the space created by yesterday's cancellations!

More ironic, according to RTT» (Real Time Trains - website), the service left RT.

Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40784



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #694 on: August 05, 2019, 06:53:21 »

The 1 minute delay reported to the sleeper is probably a side effect from some internal change being flagged up - it reminds me of the changes we used to see on the Westbury - Southampton 11:11 train on days that it was provided by a 153.  153s could not be routed through platform 3 at Salisbury after some works had been done on the platform, and the signalman was alerted by changing the class 2 train into a class 9 train.  Something similar with last night's sleeper??
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9832



View Profile
« Reply #695 on: October 18, 2019, 11:14:11 »

The up sleeper failed near Ivybridge last night and had to be rescued by the Rail Head Treatment train.  Carriages were taken back to Plymouth and passengers moved to an IET (Intercity Express Train).  Arrival in London was just over two hours late.
Logged
Rob on the hill
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 354


View Profile
« Reply #696 on: October 18, 2019, 17:42:15 »

The up sleeper failed near Ivybridge last night and had to be rescued by the Rail Head Treatment train.  Carriages were taken back to Plymouth and passengers moved to an IET (Intercity Express Train).  Arrival in London was just over two hours late.

The failed sleeper has been returned to Reading as 5Z70, hauled by 2 back-to-back class 43 power cars.
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O49687/2019-10-18/detailed

Picture on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10219751223748490&set=gm.2329623273832401&type=3&theater

Logged
metallikat75
Newbie
*
Posts: 5


View Profile
« Reply #697 on: November 04, 2019, 09:21:20 »

The up sleeper failed near Ivybridge last night and had to be rescued by the Rail Head Treatment train.  Carriages were taken back to Plymouth and passengers moved to an IET (Intercity Express Train).  Arrival in London was just over two hours late.
I was on this train; the replacement IET had only standard class carriages and set off around 4am, so not much sleep on that part of the journey. Unfortunately history repeated itself last night, when the night riviera broke down again at Plymouth around midnight. They offered hotel rooms, but most people seemed to opt for the replacement IET. This time it had a few first class carriages and the reclining seats made sleep a bit more possible. I’m glad I took my winter coat; it made for a good blanket. Appalling behaviour from some of the passengers towards the onboard staff, I’m sorry to say. Unfortunately I’m now put off using the sleeper in future and am probably going to change the couple of pre-booked tickets I have for it daytime tickets instead.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5408



View Profile
« Reply #698 on: November 04, 2019, 11:41:02 »

An ongoing very poor performance.
How hard can it be to purchase or lease a handful of locomotives that are able to reliably make the long and perilous journey between London and Penzance ?

The load is modest compared to many freight trains that run reliably day after day. The timings are relaxed, so no startling performance is needed.

The anger of passengers is well justified, though I am very sorry to hear that this was taken out on the staff, who hopefully did what they could.

Also don't understand the bit about the substitute IET (Intercity Express Train) having only standard class seats on one occasion? First class is minimal and rather basic but present on every unit.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« Reply #699 on: November 04, 2019, 22:27:09 »

I suspect we are in a period of make do and mend with the Night Riviera fleet. It'll probably be so until such time as a new franchise tender (or whatever form of passenger railway operation the future holds) is enacted.

The sensible thing to do would be to order Mk5 Sleeper carriages from CAF. The bugs have/are being ironed out by Caledonian Sleeper.

They should then be hauled by electro-diesel Class 88s with an uprated diesel generator capable of completing the off wire runs between Newbury/Chippenham/Bristol and the South West.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7794



View Profile
« Reply #700 on: November 05, 2019, 04:58:45 »

21:45 Penzance to London Paddington due 05:03
04/11/19 21:45 Penzance to London Paddington due 05:03 has been previously delayed and is now 68 minutes late from Taunton.
This is due to a fault on this train.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40784



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #701 on: November 05, 2019, 06:23:54 »

21:45 Penzance to London Paddington due 05:03
04/11/19 21:45 Penzance to London Paddington due 05:03 has been previously delayed and is now 68 minutes late from Taunton.
This is due to a fault on this train.

Rolled in to Paddington 27 minutes late, having been up to 96 minutes late at Newton Abbott and 53 late arriving in Reading.   Shocking record at the moment, but I don't expect too many passengers arriving at Paddington actually want to get off before 05:30.   Of course, if you're headed for an early flight from Heathrow ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6438


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #702 on: November 05, 2019, 10:18:11 »

An ongoing very poor performance.
How hard can it be to purchase or lease a handful of locomotives that are able to reliably make the long and perilous journey between London and Penzance ?

Probably not too hard, but expensive.
Logged

Now, please!
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #703 on: November 05, 2019, 10:29:22 »

Didn't occasionally an ex-Pendolino Thunderbird class 57 loco get drafted in to haul this stock and why can't they revert to that situation again
Logged
Celestial
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 674


View Profile
« Reply #704 on: November 05, 2019, 11:22:05 »

21:45 Penzance to London Paddington due 05:03
04/11/19 21:45 Penzance to London Paddington due 05:03 has been previously delayed and is now 68 minutes late from Taunton.
This is due to a fault on this train.

Rolled in to Paddington 27 minutes late, having been up to 96 minutes late at Newton Abbott and 53 late arriving in Reading.   Shocking record at the moment, but I don't expect too many passengers arriving at Paddington actually want to get off before 05:30.   Of course, if you're headed for an early flight from Heathrow ...

You'd be ill-advised to have a schedule that doesn't allow for a half hour delay if travelling from LHR (or most airports unless you've a very short journey to it), particularly on a journey of several hours, even before allowing for the sleeper unreliability.

My other half always used to complain I wanted to leave too early when making such journeys, but those grumbles stopped after we got held for an hour at Swindon due to a fatality ahead.  We still made the flight, though it was a bit too close for comfort.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 63
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page