Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:55 28 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:23 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:20 Reading to Shalford
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:30 Shalford to Reading
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:17 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 19:40 Redhill to Reading
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 21:02:38 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[118] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[116] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[89] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Return of the BRUTE?
[38] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[28] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Gatelines, social distancing and unnecessary ticketless travel  (Read 2204 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« on: April 08, 2020, 15:41:43 »

Northern appear to have got themselves into a pickle of reversed decisions on the balance between opening gate lines and not checking tickets for distancing reasons, and the problems of ticketless and unnecessary travel that brings.

from Business Live

Quote
Northern to start checking rail tickets again after increase in 'unneccessary day trips'

Last week, the firm announced passengers would not need to show their tickets due to Covid-19 fears - but it has been forced to reverse the policy
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2020, 18:47:53 »

Surely keeping gatelines open to avoid queues without the required social distances is the least that can be done? The potential loss from an unscrupulous few who might "take advantage" is surely insignificant against the overall loss of fare income because most are not travelling?
Logged
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1145


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2020, 10:37:24 »

The trouble is that many organisations are currently making decisions about social distancing etc that have not been fully thought through.

We have three supermarkets in Chippenham that I use - Sainsburys, Morrisons and Tesco. All have a queuing system outside the store and, whilst both Sainsburys and Tesco's queueing systems are flexible (ie, if there is no queue you can walk straight in), Morrissons have erected metal barriers outside their store so that you have to walk through a chicane not unlike the arrangements one finds in airport security or passport control. This effectively means that irrespective of the number of people actually wanting to get in, you have to walk up and down their store forecourt three times before you get to the entrance door.

Sainsburys allow customers to go straight to an availble checkout. Morrisons and Tesco want customers to queue, and Tesco have closed off their self service tills.

I am not one to dawdle in supermarkets at the best of times - I want to go in, pick up what I want, pay for it and get out, and I want to do that even more so now in the current crisis. All it needs is one infected person who doesn't know they are infected to be wandering around the store and everyone in there will be at increased risk. Morrisson's chicane and Tesco closing their self service tills, as I see it, are actually increasing the length of time that their customers could be exposed to the virus whilst on their premises.

That of course is my own personal view. I would be intetsted to know the views of others.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2020, 11:18:04 »

The trouble is that many organisations are currently making decisions about social distancing etc that have not been fully thought through.

I was a bit puzzled, when this whole thing got started, by the number of criticisms of the government's actions and advice I heard that could be paraphrased to include "this hasn't been thoroughly thought through". Well, no - don't we all know that? It's all been hurried improvisation, right from the start. I had some sympathy for opposition politicians doing this, as it's their default setting, but it went far wider into the commentariat. 

I'm not convinced we've reached a stage where it's reasonable to expect a much more reasoned coherent basis for the measures. Ideally, yes, we'd have well-targeted evidence-based restrictions, but for a start there is almost no worthwhile evidence of what measures reduce infection risk by how much. Plus, of course, high priority has been given to simplifying the message so it can be used as a battering ram rather than a learned treatise. There are very good reasons for that, though I'd agree it's been OTT (Open Train Times website) in some respects.

On the basis of the evidence, WHO are still saying that to have a significant chance of catching the virus directly you need to be within 1 m of someone infectious for 15 minutes - the chance is much higher via surfaces you touch. From that follows the advice on keeping well apart in queues, though not in aisles (or parks). But different groups of advisors (whether expert or "expert") can easily come up with different rules, depending on how they weight importance, ease to implement, visibility, reassurance to others, etc., etc...

If there's one extra measure I think fits the evidence and would help it's more cleaning of hands and handles in supermarkets and other shops. Ideally, several times as you go round! That was included in the output of one bunch of experts in Nantes, but they also included strict one-way movement and no overtaking so you never passed anyone else in an aisle, and not touching anything and putting it back. They wanted to ban gloves used by shop staff - which also makes sense, unless they are discarded after every customer. But chacun a son avis ...
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page