Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:35 23 Apr 2024
* Light aircraft crashes near Prestwick Airport
* Wales' 20mph overhaul to start in September
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

No 'On This Day' events reported for 23rd Apr

Train RunningCancelled
16:23 Swansea to London Paddington
17:48 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:00 Oxford to London Paddington
18:26 Newbury to Bedwyn
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
18:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
19:23 London Paddington to Oxford
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:58 Frome to Westbury
21:02 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
17:57 London Paddington to Evesham
19:47 Bristol Temple Meads to Frome
20:14 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
20:24 Evesham to London Paddington
Delayed
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 23, 2024, 18:43:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[270] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[87] "Mayflower"
[77] You see all sorts on the bus.
[49] Penalty fares on Severn Beach Line
[41] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[38] Where have I been?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: 'They wouldn't let cattle travel like this' (Bristol Post)  (Read 10317 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18920



View Profile
« on: January 09, 2015, 20:43:36 »

From the Bristol Post:

Quote
'They wouldn't let cattle travel like this': Bristol rail commuters blast crowded trains

THESE pictures show the awful conditions suffered by hundreds of rail commuters on a daily basis travelling in and out of Bristol.





With rarely a hope of getting a seat, many workers on the evening Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central service are resigned to the fact that they will be packed onto a train that is standing room only, nose to nose with other commuters.

But being squashed onto a train like a sardine in a can is not just a one-off experience for people on this train ^ it is one repeated, sometimes on a twice-daily basis, for many commuters coming in and out of Bristol on local trains from many different stations.

Passengers from Bath, Weston-super- Mare, Parkway ^ and many more ^ all have similar experiences of overcrowding. And now with commuters again being asked to pay even more for tickets, many are asking why train companies seem to be falling below the mark with the service they provide.

One of those fed up with his daily commute ^ and who took these pictures ^ is Paul Jenkins, 34, from Patchway.

Mr Jenkins, a bank worker, gets the 5.21pm service from Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central, to return from his job in the city centre to Patchway.

This week he made an official complaint to First Great Western because of the awful conditions he has been forced to suffer on this service.

The pictures shown here were taken on his journey home on Tuesday, when only two coaches turned up, instead of the usual three. He says that hundreds of passengers waiting on the platform were forced to crowd onto the train ^ with a number being left on the platform.

Mr Jenkins says a member of staff made a public address, saying he did not know where the usual third coach was and asked people to "squeeze up".

Rather than being a one-off, he claims this is a regular occurrence, with passengers waiting on the platform unsure of what will arrive and whether they will be able to get home.

Mr Jenkins told the Bristol Post: "With train ticket prices rising year on year and commuter numbers ever growing, train operators should be adapting and ensuring their customers are provided with a certain level of service.

"It is my opinion that First Great Western are falling way below the mark whilst their profits soar. All I ask as a commuter and customer is to be treated with a degree of respect and decency and to be able to at least stand without somebody else standing on my shoes. I'm sure cattle would not be allowed or expected to be transported in such conditions. Luckily for me I live in Patchway and don't have to endure the conditions for long but many commuters from Cardiff travel to Bristol for work. These people pump lots of money into Bristol's economy and pay good money for train tickets only to be treated so badly."

Sarah Harrison, 25, from Cardiff, has been using the line to commute this week.

She said: "On Tuesday it was like people were sardines, they were really packed in. I had to yell at someone to move and get on the train."

Some travellers were resigned to the overcrowding and viewed it as an inescapable part of commuting.

Felix Ritchie, who works at UWE, usually gets on the train to Cardiff at Patchway. He said: "I try to avoid the train that arrives from Temple Meads around 5.30pm that only has two coaches. I think a few more coaches would make life more bearable for everyone."

A First Great Western spokesman told the Post that there was a national shortage of rolling stock and that the company was leasing as much as is available.

He said: "The Government has procured ^4.5 billion worth of new rolling stock in the Intercity Express Programme (IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.)) and we can expect to see the first new IEP trains on our network by the summer of 2017, which will have an positive impact for those travelling between Bristol and Cardiff and beyond.

"The first train left Japan yesterday and is due to arrive in the UK (United Kingdom) for testing in March. We are very much a victim of our own success, which has seen significant increases in demand for train travel over the last ten years. Despite the lack of availability of suitable additional trains in the UK, we have worked hard to secure additional capacity. Working with the DfT» (Department for Transport - about), we are converting first-class carriages to add an additional standard carriage on each high speed train (HST (High Speed Train)) service. Once complete (summer 2015) this will add 3,000 standard seats, nearly 16 per cent more capacity in the morning peak into and out of London Paddington.

"We recognise there is still much to do and we are working with the DfT to secure further service improvements ^ this includes working with Network Rail and Bristol City Council on the Metro West project, which will deliver direct improvements to suburban stopping services."

Addressing the specific problems raised by passengers using the 5.21pm Bristol to Cardiff service, the spokesman said that in spring last year the service was increased from two carriages to three. He said: "In the last eight weeks the service has been short-formed a total of five times. Once to provide additional capacity for a football event; once because of overrunning Network Rail engineering work which caused displaced rolling stock, and the other three because of rolling stock faults across the network."

This article was also the cover story for the print edition of the Bristol Post on Friday January 9th 2015.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
trainer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1035


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2015, 22:37:23 »

It's the Post's week to be 'shocked' by railway stories it seems. The other day (if I read the A boards and headlines correctly) it was banging on about the difference in fares from Bristol to the North compared with from more heavily-subsidised Wales. Overcrowding and complaints about high fares are hardly news, but it's good to share the outrage at life around a bit. Roll Eyes
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7798



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2015, 09:53:30 »

It's the Post's week to be 'shocked' by railway stories it seems. The other day (if I read the A boards and headlines correctly) it was banging on about the difference in fares from Bristol to the North compared with from more heavily-subsidised Wales. Overcrowding and complaints about high fares are hardly news, but it's good to share the outrage at life around a bit. Roll Eyes

I think what people are most "shocked" by is the blase attitude of the rail industry to what are unacceptable and dangerous levels of extreme overcrowding throughout the network on a daily basis, which no-one at any level really seems that bothered about addressing.
Logged
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2015, 11:06:12 »

It all comes down to DaFT» (Department for Transport - critical sounding abbreviation I discourage - about) Bean Counting and lengthy processes to accomplish anything.   Also, they keep saying there will be more trains available in 20XX due to electrification or any other cascades when the trains are required now.    This overcrowding situation has been worsening over the years as passenger numbers have grown.  In other businesses they work On Demand and Supply but not in the Rail industry.
Logged
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 785


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2015, 11:48:06 »

The Bristol Post is of course quite correct - cattle never get a seat under any circumstances.  Grin
Logged
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 455


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2015, 12:21:16 »


I think what people are most "shocked" by is the blase attitude of the rail industry to what are unacceptable and dangerous levels of extreme overcrowding throughout the network on a daily basis, which no-one at any level really seems that bothered about addressing.

In what sense is overcrowding 'dangerous'? Do all UndergrounD travellers get a seat?

Standing might be 'uncomfortable' but that's as far as it goes.

The Bristol Post is of course quite correct - cattle never get a seat under any circumstances.  Grin

And as Ian Walmsley pointed out in a recent edition of Modern Railways, passengers tend not to be slaughtered at the end of the journey...


(PS, when was the last time anyone saw cattle being moved by train?)
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5214


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2015, 12:23:53 »

It all comes down to DaFT» (Department for Transport - critical sounding abbreviation I discourage - about) Bean Counting and lengthy processes to accomplish anything.   Also, they keep saying there will be more trains available in 20XX due to electrification or any other cascades when the trains are required now.    This overcrowding situation has been worsening over the years as passenger numbers have grown.  In other businesses they work On Demand and Supply but not in the Rail industry.

Now of course if only the railway was to be renationalised, then they'd be able to set up a subcommittee reporting to the commons committee into the restructuring of transport, which could commission a report that would recommend solutions to be implemented just after the next election.

Everything would be sorted out in no time.

Well, in hardly any time.

Geologically speaking.


...passengers tend not to be slaughtered at the end of the journey...


...you should have seen me last time I went to Bath. By God I had a thick head the next day

Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7167


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2015, 12:29:11 »

Isn't the choice of words a bit unrealistic?
Quote
'They wouldn't let cattle travel like this'
The cattle don't have a lot of choice. So that should be:
'They wouldn't let people force cattle to travel like this'
Quote
This week he made an official complaint to First Great Western because of the awful conditions he has been forced to suffer on this service.
Now I'm pretty sure he chose to board that train when it was full. Some people already on board could make that complaint, though. In both cases the only immediate action FGW (First Great Western) could have taken is to prevent him and many others boarding. So the re-write is:
"... the awful conditions he has been allowed to suffer on this service", or in his case: "... the awful conditions he and other people have been allowed to suffer on this service due to his being allowed to choose to board it."

I suspect he'd still complain about that, though.
Logged
Super Guard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1308


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2015, 17:55:03 »

It's the Post's week to be 'shocked' by railway stories it seems. The other day (if I read the A boards and headlines correctly) it was banging on about the difference in fares from Bristol to the North compared with from more heavily-subsidised Wales. Overcrowding and complaints about high fares are hardly news, but it's good to share the outrage at life around a bit. Roll Eyes

I think what people are most "shocked" by is the blase attitude of the rail industry to what are unacceptable and dangerous levels of extreme overcrowding throughout the network on a daily basis, which no-one at any level really seems that bothered about addressing.

Ridiculous.  The industry cares, and new rolling stock is coming which will benefit the whole of GW (Great Western) land, as you well know.  It of course is not ideal in the short term, but the rolling stock (at present) is not in existence.
Logged

Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own.  I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.

If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: January 10, 2015, 19:55:01 »

Many people raise the safety issue in overcrowded trains suggesting it shouldn't be allowed.   There is no legislation on the subject and I don't think any proposal to introduce would not be welcomed by TOCs (Train Operating Company) who are happy to just cram them in.
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3462

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 10, 2015, 20:28:26 »

If I thought it was unsafe I wouldn't board.

However I would imagine standing tightly compact is safer than standing with loads of space. In say an emergency stop, if there is loads of space around you, you'd get thrown about, but if tightly compact there is nowhere to be thrown about.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18920



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 10, 2015, 20:39:45 »

The Bristol Post is of course quite correct - cattle never get a seat under any circumstances.  Grin

Although not on public transport, this one has managed to bag a seat:

Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7798



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 10, 2015, 20:42:58 »

If I thought it was unsafe I wouldn't board.

However I would imagine standing tightly compact is safer than standing with loads of space. In say an emergency stop, if there is loads of space around you, you'd get thrown about, but if tightly compact there is nowhere to be thrown about.

....and if there's a fire or need for swift evacuation involving a train that is so overcrowded and packed that people can't move to the exits quickly enough?
Logged
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2274


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: January 10, 2015, 21:39:33 »

My rush hour journeys to Bath or my other ones on the Severn Beach Line can be very overcrowded.... just as madly dangerous as the London Tube journeys as when I was young and handsome!
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18920



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: January 10, 2015, 22:00:03 »

If I thought it was unsafe I wouldn't board.

However I would imagine standing tightly compact is safer than standing with loads of space. In say an emergency stop, if there is loads of space around you, you'd get thrown about, but if tightly compact there is nowhere to be thrown about.

....and if there's a fire or need for swift evacuation involving a train that is so overcrowded and packed that people can't move to the exits quickly enough?

Good point. It's often forgotten by those who say overcrowding is safer in an incident with a train, that not all potential incidents are ones involving rapid deceleration. Fire and/or smoke in a confined space are very dangerous when people are trying to escape quickly.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page