Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum
15.12.2019 - what changes?
Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
Read about the forum [here].
Register and contribute [here] - it's free.
article index - [here]
 tomorrow - Santa Special - Melksham
tomorrow - GWR Timetable recast
16/12/2019 - Network Rail Surgery, BWT
24/12/2019 - No GWR trains, Paddington
25/12/2019 - No GWR trains (at all)
25/12/2019 - No train - Severn Tunnel
Random Image
Train Running @GWR Twitter Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail news GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4 Chat on off
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
December 14, 2019, 02:00:05 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[120] IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent pe...
[109] General election - policies on Transport - what should we look...
[87] For 2020 ...
[49] Railway station vs train station
[38] Worcestershire Parkway Station project - ongoing discussion
[36] Shortage of train crews on Great Western Railway since Septemb...
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bristol's Temple Gate layout change planned in £21m revamp  (Read 16083 times)
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1212


Still want to be a train driver when I grow up


View Profile
« Reply #120 on: November 27, 2019, 02:37:02 pm »

That shining beacon of local journalism that is Bristol Live reports that the end may be in sight for the long over running road works around Temple Gate/Temple Circus. The latest estimate is for December 16.  Article link below:

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/new-date-announced-temple-circus-3580520
Logged

Santa, I can explain
metalrail
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 189


View Profile
« Reply #121 on: November 27, 2019, 08:22:02 pm »

Spotted an item on the very excellent roads.org.uk about the Army and Navy Flyover, in Chelmsford... an interesting read, I think. Like the erstwhile Redcliffe Flyover, it was designed as a temporary fix ahead of a planned major new junction, and like its Redcliffe sibling the new road happened somewhere else. Another similarity is that the local authority is having a hard time explaining why it has to go, and why it won't be replaced.

Quote
"This is an emergency situation," according to the council's deputy leader Cllr Kevin Bentley, "and I would ask for patience and understanding during this challenging time." He has also bravely pledged that he will "not place any Essex resident in danger". If you listen carefully you can hear his superhero cape rippling in the breeze.
At long last Essex Man joins the Marvel Universe.

This part in that same report rang a few bells...
Quote
"Sadly it's actually a joint working group involving the council, a firm of consulting engineers, local residents and the city's MP who have spent the last year holding meetings to talk about how bad the traffic is"

Sound familiar?  Or in Bristol's case would it be more like several decades?   Wink
Logged

Oh for the day when I can catch a train from Mangotsfield to the Centre, Bath and Yate!  ;-)
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 368


View Profile
« Reply #122 on: November 27, 2019, 09:20:40 pm »

That shining beacon of local journalism that is Bristol Live reports that the end may be in sight for the long over running road works around Temple Gate/Temple Circus. The latest estimate is for December 16.  Article link below:

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/new-date-announced-temple-circus-3580520

For the benefit of those who have not been there recently it does seem to be just about done bar a bit of snagging and clearing up.

I haven't driven through it in the morning, but things seem to be much more fluid.
Logged
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1304


View Profile
« Reply #123 on: November 28, 2019, 07:26:54 am »

I haven't driven through it in the morning, but things seem to be much more fluid.

Don't you mean 'flooded?'  Shocked
« Last Edit: November 28, 2019, 05:32:32 pm by Red Squirrel » Logged
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 368


View Profile
« Reply #124 on: November 28, 2019, 04:03:02 pm »

I haven't driven through it in the morning, but things seem to be much more fluid.

Don't you mean 'flooded?'  Shocked


Decongested ;-)
« Last Edit: November 28, 2019, 05:33:47 pm by Red Squirrel » Logged
Phantom
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 293



View Profile Email
« Reply #125 on: November 29, 2019, 10:54:54 am »

As someone who commutes daily to Temple Meads then onwards using a bus from the main road, it does look like it is all finally drawing to a close

There are some very odd bits around the new design, there is a very short cycle lane outside the pub that comes and goes from nowhere, when cycle lanes coming into Bristol down the Bath / Wells Road are on the other side of the road

Agree with the above the snag list could make for a timely extension to all this
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2395


View Profile
« Reply #126 on: December 03, 2019, 09:23:27 am »

Not sure which pub that is but very short cycle lanes that come and go from nowhere are all too common.
https://road.cc/content/news/269183-video-cyclist-times-himself-new-bristol-cycle-path-and-finds-its-way-quicker
Quote
It took Toby Wells, an engineer, two and a half times longer to get from Bath Bridge to Temple Way using Bristol City Council’s new Temple Gate cycle route than it did sticking to the road – clocking in respectively at 6 minutes 14 seconds and 2 minutes 24 seconds.
Although the video is of someone cycling, the problem affects pedestrians too. In part because they are forced to share the pavement with cyclists and also because the time consuming part is waiting for the lights to change.
Quote
Wells wrote: “Notice that on the road, once you get going it's green all the way through. The lights are synchronised to and adjusted by the flow of cars.

“For the ped/cycle crossings it's the opposite – either they are never green until button push (i.e. stop EVERY time), or they are specifically phased so you have to cross one junction in 2 goes, every time. Right of the vid is my no. of button pushes, and I was lucky at some!

“Also the sheer number of transitions between sharing/segregated is ridiculous. It's confusing and dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists,” he added, saying it “will undoubtedly lead to conflict.”
Logged

Day return to Infinity, please.
Red Squirrel
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3312


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #127 on: December 03, 2019, 10:34:05 am »

At a meeting I attended recently, a cyclist summed it up rather well:

Quote
It's not just done badly, it's done expensively badly
Logged
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 368


View Profile
« Reply #128 on: December 03, 2019, 02:29:40 pm »


There are some very odd bits around the new design, there is a very short cycle lane outside the pub that comes and goes from nowhere, when cycle lanes coming into Bristol down the Bath / Wells Road are on the other side of the road


There isn't an inbound cycle lane over the Bath Road bridge, it's outbound only.

But on the case of the very short cycle path, I think there are two possibilities:

1) The Council are taking an extreme long view, future proofing it for when the  car dealership is demolished and they can grab an extra bit of pavement
2) It's a cynical ploy to add to the length and number of cycle lanes in the city

2)
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page