Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:55 28 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 00:12:36 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[98] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[97] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[86] Return of the BRUTE?
[74] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[23] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: 17:36 relief  (Read 3506 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« on: March 26, 2015, 09:28:53 »

Split off from a public board ... so we can share ideas that are being floated

What's happening ?   Is it going over to 150 in May ?

I believe John R meant in April 2017 before the upgrades across the network in May 2017, rather than April 17th

The question as I read it is "with current growth and a nearly-full 17:36 already, how do we maintain growth / not turn people off using the service in the period prior to a strengthening of that train in 2 years time?".  There have been some discussions already, but at an exploratory stage, and now is a good time to make practical suggestions (or suggestions that you don't know about, but may turn out to be practical  Wink ).

Indeed Graham, that's exactly what I was thinking. My only thought was perhaps there is a pacer diagram in Devon where a 153 would suffice, so they could be swapped. Would mean ecs working each day between Exeter and Westbury though with the extra costs that entails.

John R - hadn't thought of that one.

Other ideas:

a) Run an extra service at 16:36 (previously discussed) and that may only get as far as MKM» (Melksham (Station code) - next trains), but I think volumes are such we may be able to justify it

b) Allow customers to travel on 17:00 and 18:00 from Swindon and switch to 234 bus at Chippenham Station (met the MD of First Bus Bath Bristol last night / may be on the cards)

c) The daily set swap for the TransWilts occurs between the 18:21 arrival from Swindon and the 18:32 departure back.   When does the incoming train arrive (attached to what) and could its arrival be moved up so that it can double up on the 16:15 round trip from Westbury?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2015, 08:23:53 »

Another thought - FGW (First Great Western) agrees to take on the Vivarail demonstrator (presumably at minimal cost as Vivarail need the trial to showcase their train). This is deployed on, say, the Looe branch releasing a 153 for the TW service. This could bridge the gap from May 16 to May 17 until other stock becomes available.
Logged
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1260


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2015, 10:10:42 »

Put that D unit on a self contained diagram on the west country branches like you have suggested or perhaps on the severn beach branch
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2015, 11:40:51 »

Until reliability is proven I'd keep it off anything that is heavily trafficked and where a failure could result in a lot of bad publicity.  So an out of peak season start on the Looe branch would be ideal.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: April 02, 2015, 22:40:29 »

So an out of peak season start on the Looe branch would be ideal.

Purely out of idle curiosity, where is Looe?  Tongue
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 03, 2015, 10:39:05 »

Quote
a) Run an extra service at 16:36 (previously discussed) and that may only get as far as MKM» (Melksham (Station code) - next trains), but I think volumes are such we may be able to justify it

Apologies if this has been discussed before elsewhere but would I be correct in assuming the 16:24 from Cheltenham then forms the 17:54 back?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: April 03, 2015, 11:25:40 »

Quote
a) Run an extra service at 16:36 (previously discussed) and that may only get as far as MKM» (Melksham (Station code) - next trains), but I think volumes are such we may be able to justify it

Apologies if this has been discussed before elsewhere but would I be correct in assuming the 16:24 from Cheltenham then forms the 17:54 back?

Correct
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 02, 2015, 21:25:26 »

Still thinking about how more stock could be allocated to the route...

On Friday the 0509 Plymouth to Paddington was replaced by a Cl 150 from Exeter to Bristol. Not for the first time either.  So my question is, is this a spare unit sitting at Exeter, or did its journey up to Bristol result in cancellations and short formations elsewhere in Devon?

Overall, how much spare stock is sitting around in the peak? Appreciate that some is needed as contingency, but is there a location where the spare stock is so infrequently called upon that it would be better employed actually providing a service and accepting the occasional cancellation or short formation.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 02, 2015, 21:51:26 »

RealTime Trains shows it ran as a HST (High Speed Train) from Exeter.

http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/C20015/2015/05/01/advanced

Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 03, 2015, 04:55:11 »

I can assure you it wasn't.  The set swap at Bristol did confuse the Passenger Information Systems though, as the onward service from BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains) was announced as "formed of two coaches, first class is at the front of the train"...
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 24, 2015, 22:58:58 »

Another thought - FGW (First Great Western) agrees to take on the Vivarail demonstrator (presumably at minimal cost as Vivarail need the trial to showcase their train). This is deployed on, say, the Looe branch releasing a 153 for the TW service. This could bridge the gap from May 16 to May 17 until other stock becomes available.

Interesting to see that trial use of the Vivarail D train is being very seriously considered as part of the new franchise. 
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #11 on: May 24, 2017, 12:04:17 »

Quote
a) Run an extra service at 16:36 (previously discussed) and that may only get as far as MKM» (Melksham (Station code) - next trains), but I think volumes are such we may be able to justify it

Apologies if this has been discussed before elsewhere but would I be correct in assuming the 16:24 from Cheltenham then forms the 17:54 back?

Updating this topic ...

The 16:24 arrival at Swindon platform 2 does go back to Cheltenham Spa at 17:54
The 16:33 arrival at Westbury platform 2 waits there until 17:11 when it leaves for Warminster.

We have looked long at hard at ways of getting the train from Swindon at 16:24 to Westbury for 17:11, and the train at Westbury at 16:33 to Swindon for 17:54.    All very tight indeed - in fact it gets ruled out by the inability to leave Swindon until 16:36 (unless you delay the 15:30 London to Bristol train) and it wouldn't then get to Westbury for 17:11.   That 17:11 looks at first glance like a right 'lemon' of a train - Dilton Marsh and Warminster only, 10 minutes after a Portsmouth train that also calls at Warminster.   However, it's needed both to meet the SLC (Service Level Commitment) for Dilton Marsh and (this is why we're not messing) to form the 17:28 from Warminster which takes a significant number of daily passengers from there.

However, TransWilts volumes are now such that the previous idea of running a train as far as Melksham and back begin to look sensible on balance.   Previously, we feared that would abstract passengers from the previous and next trains (15:12 and 17:36) so be an extra cost to offset against the gain.   But now, with the 15:12 and 17:36 both full and standing, that abstraction would be welcome as it would give more passenger capacity on those other two trains - as well as encouraging new traffic.  Works out well as a 16:48 from Swindon, 17:14 to 17:20 at Melksham. And helps provide a commute into Melksham option too.  That latter not ideal (yet) as morning arrivals from Swindon have a big gap - but it would suite some.

Here's where we could be headed ...




« Last Edit: May 24, 2017, 12:12:47 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #12 on: May 24, 2017, 13:30:23 »

The 16:24 arrival at Swindon platform 2 does go back to Cheltenham Spa at 17:54
The 16:33 arrival at Westbury platform 2 waits there until 17:11 when it leaves for Warminster.

Did I mention ...
The 16:15 arrival at Salisbury platform 6 from Romsey, returning there at 16:56
The 17:15 arrival at Salisbury platform 6 from Romsey, returning there at 17:56

If anyone can see how use can be made of these (total) 210 layover minutes - that's 3.5 hours downtime - in Wiltshire between 4 and 6 p.m., please let me know.  It's very frustrating to see trains sitting around when people want to be travelling!

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
bbam87
Newbie
*
Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: May 24, 2017, 13:45:37 »

Thanks for this post grahame and for adding me to this forum and board.

While a 16:48 departure from Swindon would be great, only going as far as Melksham would make it redundant for many people who would depart it at Trowbridge and Westbury (including myself who lives in Warminster).  A large percentage of those people that catch the 17:36 from Swindon travel all the way through to Trowbridge and Westbury, as you know.  A lot of these users would also wish for and benefit from an earlier train than the 17:36.  Is there anyway that the timing of the 17:36 can be brought forward earlier, rather than putting in an additional train at 16:48, as the 18:48 follows closely after the 17:36 in comparison to other time gaps.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #14 on: May 24, 2017, 14:14:13 »

Thanks for this post grahame and for adding me to this forum and board.

While a 16:48 departure from Swindon would be great, only going as far as Melksham would make it redundant for many people who would depart it at Trowbridge and Westbury (including myself who lives in Warminster).  A large percentage of those people that catch the 17:36 from Swindon travel all the way through to Trowbridge and Westbury, as you know.  A lot of these users would also wish for and benefit from an earlier train than the 17:36.  Is there anyway that the timing of the 17:36 can be brought forward earlier, rather than putting in an additional train at 16:48, as the 18:48 follows closely after the 17:36 in comparison to other time gaps.

Very much aware that the 16:48 wouldn't work directly for passengers south of Melksham - that's why it was ruled out in that form until now.   But as there are up to 40 passengers getting off the 17:36 at Melksham, and 20+ off the 15:12, it would offer some relief from overcrowding and at least allow Trowbridge and beyond passengers a bit of space on the 17:36.

Pulling the 17:36 earlier would have to be to 17:19 so it could get out of the way of the 17:30 Bristol Express after Chippenham.  But that would cut the area that 5 O'Clock finishers could get to the station is Swindon to just 28% of what t is at present and I suspect we would have some very very upset customers (or ex customers!).

Quote
>>> 19 ** 2
361
>>> 36 ** 2
1296
>>> 361 / 1296.0
0.2785493827160494

That's a simplistic calculation ... and I would be willing to have my calculation / hypothesis disproved, but I don't think the solution of grabbing a quarter of an hour there would compensate [many] others having to wait a further hour.

The "real" solution comes when services start running through ... the 17:28 from Warminster being fed up from Salisbury (and probably becoming 17:35 from Warminster) then the 17:11 off Westbury could run that bit later (say 17:26) and form the 17:56 onward to Romsey from Salisbury.   That would be fed off the 16:48 from Swindon.  Various cross-franchise issues involved though. And the 16:33 arrival at Westbury would go up to Swindon to form the 17:54 from there to Cheltenham Spa. The issue that leaves you with is the 17:35 from Warminster gets tight for timing as it's supposed to be part of a near-clockface service up to Worcester.  Another consideration in that mix is the freight path through Melksham at 16:53 which could (along with the 16:48 from Swindon) make it impossible to find a path for the new Westbury to Swindon service.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page