Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About
Waterloo Campaign
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 04:35 29 Jun 2022
- Why I kept my sexuality a secret at work
- Rail workers outdated, says Transport Secretary
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 16/07/22 - Railfuture AGM, Bristol
23/07/22 - 100 years / Hythe Pier
20/08/22 - Imber Bus
20/08/22 - Imber bus day

On this day
29th Jun (1898)
First through passenger train leaves St Johns for Port-aux-Basques

Train RunningNo cancellations or delays
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
June 29, 2022, 04:51:54 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[60] 2022 - TransWilts cancellations and amendments log
[53] FlexiSeasons - a year on?
[53] Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion
[38] Bristol Parkway consultation meetings
[36] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[31] Off to Weymouth on Sunday!
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6
  Print  
Author Topic: Taplow Station Footbridge Closed over Main Lines  (Read 68042 times)
lordgoata
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 415



View Profile
« Reply #60 on: February 12, 2018, 03:35:27 pm »

NR» (Network Rail - home page) won't want to pay for it, they need to save all their money to replace the OHLE like they promised in Goring Gap!  Roll Eyes Grin
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5139


View Profile
« Reply #61 on: February 12, 2018, 04:38:16 pm »

NR» (Network Rail - home page) won't want to pay for it, they need to save all their money to replace the OHLE like they promised in Goring Gap!  Roll Eyes Grin

What did they actually promise on that, I can't remember.   A review, maybe?

Paul
Logged
lordgoata
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 415



View Profile
« Reply #62 on: February 13, 2018, 09:28:59 am »

What did they actually promise on that, I can't remember.   A review, maybe?

No idea to be honest, it was obviously never going to happen so I didn't really pay much attention to it. I think there were some design proposals, some postponed/cancelled meetings, but not sure what happened since then.

Edit: And sorry TG, didn't mean to drag it off topic!
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 9252


View Profile
« Reply #63 on: February 13, 2018, 10:36:57 am »

Latest news on Goring is here: http://www.savegoringgap.org.uk/news.html
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10999


View Profile Email
« Reply #64 on: February 13, 2018, 10:45:25 am »

That's 5 months old....
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 9252


View Profile
« Reply #65 on: February 13, 2018, 01:02:25 pm »

That's 5 months old....

It's still the latest news...  Wink
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5139


View Profile
« Reply #66 on: February 13, 2018, 08:29:39 pm »

Latest news on Goring is here: http://www.savegoringgap.org.uk/news.html
Looking at their webpage banner, how come all those houses were allowed in an AONB (Areas Of Natural Beauty)?

Paul
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 6419



View Profile
« Reply #67 on: April 10, 2018, 11:03:08 am »

FYI (for your information) I have asked NR» (Network Rail - home page) for another update on the footbridge situation and will share the reply if/when I get it.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 6419



View Profile
« Reply #68 on: April 10, 2018, 03:19:50 pm »

Response received.............so after 3 years, it's finally confirmed. What stood for over 125 years, NR» (Network Rail - home page) clumsiness destroyed in an instant and will not be replacing.


"...........As you are aware in 2015 Taplow station footbridge sustained damage when it was hit by a rail construction vehicle undertaking electrification work. The damaged bridge spans were subsequently removed in July 2017 to be assessed.
 
Unfortunately, following this process it has been decided that we will not be reinstating the footbridge at Taplow station. I realise this may be disappointing for local residents and station users and I’d like to reassure you that the decision has not been taken likely.
 
As a long-planned part of the Crossrail programme, Transport for London (TfL» (Transport for London - about)) will shortly begin building a new passenger footbridge with two new lifts providing step-free access to platforms 2/3 and platform 4 which will be served by the Elizabeth line from December 2019.
 
We have now secured funding to extend the new footbridge to provide access to platform 1 and the car park on the southern side of the station via a staircase. The work will also create space for an additional lift to be installed in the future.
 
As a public sector organisation, we (Network Rail), have a duty to justify the money that we spend. Extending the new footbridge clearly demonstrated better value for money for the public purse, not hint terms of the initial cost of the work and the ongoing maintenance costs.
 
In the coming weeks, preparatory works to remove the remaining footbridge staircases will begin. Local residents and passengers will receive more information about the work from TfL............"
 
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #69 on: April 10, 2018, 05:31:47 pm »

I spilt my coffee when I read this bit.....
Quote
As a public sector organisation, we (Network Rail), have a duty to justify the money that we spend. Extending the new footbridge clearly demonstrated better value for money for the public purse, not hint terms of the initial cost of the work and the ongoing maintenance costs.

So when they weren't a 'public sector' organisation money didn't matter then..... Roll Eyes
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4569


View Profile Email
« Reply #70 on: July 11, 2019, 04:41:29 pm »

Continuing the Saga. We are now part way to having a Fourth Bridge in four years!

Span over the Reliefs installed last weekend.

Hopefully by December we'll have 3 seta of lifts as well!

Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4176


View Profile
« Reply #71 on: July 11, 2019, 10:59:56 pm »

Response received.............so after 3 years, it's finally confirmed. What stood for over 125 years, NR» (Network Rail - home page) clumsiness destroyed in an instant and will not be replacing.

I thought the clumsiness was on the part of their contractor not NR themselves. 
Logged
Surrey 455
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1147


View Profile
« Reply #72 on: July 12, 2019, 09:25:51 am »

Continuing the Saga. We are now part way to having a Fourth Bridge in four years!

At least it'll look immaculate, what with them continually repainting as soon as they've finished. Grin
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3777


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #73 on: July 12, 2019, 06:53:24 pm »

Response received.............so after 3 years, it's finally confirmed. What stood for over 125 years, NR» (Network Rail - home page) clumsiness destroyed in an instant and will not be replacing.

I thought the clumsiness was on the part of their contractor not NR themselves. 


The old 1887 bridge would have been difficult to make 25kV safety compliant to the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) satisfaction; to have put in the needed screening may well have over loaded the structure.  Also Crossrail are required to make platforms accessible to all meaning a lift which would have been an interesting engineering challenge to retro fit to the 1887 bridge
Logged

Neither a wise man nor a brave man lies down on the tracks of history to wait for the train of the future to run over him.     
Dwight D. Eisenhower
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 9252


View Profile
« Reply #74 on: July 12, 2019, 07:51:56 pm »

Yes, I think they may well have ended up building the new bridge anyway and then keeping the old one, possibly as without access to the island platform, but it would have been a difficult ask to modify it sympathetically, and it might have ended up looking hideous!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page