Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:15 28 Mar 2024
- Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
13:26 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
13:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
14:13 Par to Newquay
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:10 Newquay to Par
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Short Run
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:29 Weymouth to Gloucester
11:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
11:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
14:05 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 14:28:42 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Linked Events
  • CBT / SW group launch: November 14, 2015
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Help Launch New Transport Campaign Group in South West  (Read 17466 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2015, 20:35:00 »

I've notes from Steven Melia and Steven Joseph's talks which I've posted in "frequent posters" at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=16462.0 - the quality of my text is diabolical and not fit for public consumption.

That's why I've tried to edit your text there.  Roll Eyes Wink Shocked

Mooch apweciated, Chris!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: November 15, 2015, 12:47:16 »

A very interesting day.

Apologies for repeating here some of what grahame has posted elsewhere, but I thought I'd add my slant on it.

Steve Melia, Senior Lecturer in Transport and Planning at UWE, gave a particularly thought-provoking presentation which called into question a lot of assumptions about how we try to justify investment in transport infrastructure. His research suggests that once a country has a network of sealed (i.e. surfaced) roads, further investment correlates, if anything, negatively with economic growth. But corellation is not causation, and failing to invest may lead to economic decline. Look after transport and the economy will look after itself.

It's hard to sell this kind of complex argument to political decision-makers!

He also found little evidence of modal shift following public transport investment: Build a tram system and people will use it, but any road space that gets freed up as a result will soon be used by more car journeys.

As one might have expected given his credentials, he was scathing about MetroBus which he described as a Trojan Horse road-building scheme. He suggested that the Stoke Gifford Relief Road will probably turn the mile-long queue on the M32 each morning into a 3-mile queue.

Stephen Joseph, Chief Executive of CBT(resolve), outlined the reasons for launching the new group: The region needs a voice to counter the multiple threats of falling bus subsidies, the upsurge in road-building and car-based developments where walking and cycling are marginalised. We need to find more efficient ways of spending limited budgets; for example what he described as 'Total Transport' where, school and hospital services (or their vehicles and drivers) can be used by the general public.

---

At the start of the day, we were invited to raise our transport issues using post-it notes. These were grouped during the morning to identify the key campaigning areas: rail, buses, integration, planning and governance.

The rest of the day was spent in these groups, identifiying the main campaigning threads that the new CBT group should pursue. The rail group concluded that it would be worthwhile to start by identifying and filtering through the many aspiring schemes to establish which were practical and then coordinate and guide them using methods that have worked elsewhere.

I'll leave it to grahame to expand on his group's activities.

It was recognised that there is some overlap between the activities of South West CBT, TravelWatch SouthWest and Railfuture; however a South West CBT group would be more focused on future transport options and strategies than TWSW» (TravelWatch SouthWest - website), and would have a wider transport/planning brief than Railfuture.

As an aside, and perhaps influenced somewhat by Steve Melia's talk, air quality was identified as a key campaigning issue: A transport investment that appears not to stack up according to current (rather flawed, many of us agreed) BCR (Benefit Cost Ratio) analysis could potentially be justified by its impact on air quality. This may be seen as a purely urban concern, but a lot of vehicles causing air polution in cities started their journey in the country.

---

At the conclusion it was agreed that there was a role for a South West CBT Group. The next step is to formally establish it and assign roles.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #17 on: November 15, 2015, 18:00:03 »

A very interesting day.

...

I'll leave it to grahame to expand on his group's activities.


Many thanks for that  ... should help take any rural bias out of what I post ;-)

Well ... I wanted to join bus, train and "governance and integration" (an interesting linkage), which is what I went for. Turned out to be in a minority of 1 wishing to look at the integration. However, much of the talk turned to the bus bill, which has the potential to given powers to local authorities to take over bus registration and competition issues, allowing for a new frameowrk of franchised routes for the overall good. There was, alas, feeling expressed tht although Bristol itself might wish to take up powers offered, other members of the WoE partnership might shy away from doing so.

What I found overall interesting about the day ...

* It was sold / advertised with a strong "no new roads" theme, and there was literature on that topic there.  Yet there seemed to be a predominance of public transport interest.

* the people who were absent, as well as those present.  No representative from FOSBR (Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways) (though I met several of their team on the train in the morning - seems they hadn't heard of the meeting), and also missing that campaigner in a wheelchair who is always such a font of knowledge. No West Wilts Rail User Group, no RailFuture. Perhaps as this meeting was less than a third the size of last week's Bristol Rail meeting, yet covered road, cycling and buses too I should not be surprised to note the absences.

* Hearing Steven Melia talk on the hard truths of private v public  - that a doubleing of bus passengers would only cut road use by 1.3%, for example. That builing roads just moves congestion and that issues are on the local network. That a new rail / bus scheme only takes around 25% of its passengers from road.  But on the positive side, his pointing out that the 25% of "would not have travelled before" is so important in terms of new jobs, economy, helping people who were trapped at home get out (and get exercise and be active community members)

* A reminder that those from "rural areas" - however that is defined - feel left out by the urban mass and interests of a big city like Bristol, and yet the people from a big city like Bristol feel that the relatively small population is their hinterland countryside has a disproportionate influnece (and cost) on them.

* A reminder how we all need to work / plan / ask along co-ordinated lines; that travel requirements don't come to an abrupt halt at the boundary between Wiltshire and Bath, and that Frome and Rode look far more to Westbury and Trowbridge than they do to Taunton.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 589


View Profile Email
« Reply #18 on: November 15, 2015, 19:37:29 »

Interesting argument that building the Stoke Gifford By Pass will turn the regular M32 jam into a three mile M32/Ring Road/By Pass jam.

If you happen to live in Bradley Stoke, Stoke Gifford and Little Stoke you'll not regard the bypass as an extension of the M32/Ring Road, but as another way to access the M32/M4 and will take traffic away from Aztech West area, which is arguably is a more serious traffic congestion area than the M32. Certainly for the  next 18 months the Aztech West area will be chaotically busy with building of Metro Bus and SGC new plans (and government money) to address  major congestion issues in the area of M4/M5/A38.

 
Logged
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2257


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: November 15, 2015, 21:00:39 »

No representative from FOSBR (Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways)

Disappointing, I emailed the FOSBR newsletter editor about this a week previously.  I think they were on a trip to Exeter that day to speak to the people behind the newly open Newcourt Station.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: November 15, 2015, 21:03:06 »

Interesting argument that building the Stoke Gifford By Pass will turn the regular M32 jam into a three mile M32/Ring Road/By Pass jam.

If you happen to live in Bradley Stoke, Stoke Gifford and Little Stoke you'll not regard the bypass as an extension of the M32/Ring Road, but as another way to access the M32/M4 and will take traffic away from Aztech West area, which is arguably is a more serious traffic congestion area than the M32. Certainly for the  next 18 months the Aztech West area will be chaotically busy with building of Metro Bus and SGC new plans (and government money) to address  major congestion issues in the area of M4/M5/A38.

 

My fault for going for the soundbite: Steve Melia's argument was that you can't get rid of congestion; all you can do is move it around.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2015, 21:08:32 by Red Squirrel » Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #21 on: November 16, 2015, 08:39:33 »

He also found little evidence of modal shift following public transport investment: Build a tram system and people will use it, but any road space that gets freed up as a result will soon be used by more car journeys.
If investing in public transport doesn't create modal shift, what does?

As an aside, and perhaps influenced somewhat by Steve Melia's talk, air quality was identified as a key campaigning issue: A transport investment that appears not to stack up according to current (rather flawed, many of us agreed) BCR (Benefit Cost Ratio) analysis could potentially be justified by its impact on air quality. This may be seen as a purely urban concern, but a lot of vehicles causing air polution in cities started their journey in the country.
And to improve air quality what do you need? Modal shift to public transport, would be my guess. Which brings us back to the question of how to acheive modal shift. If a carrot* alone doesn't work, maybe we need a stick to use in conjunction with the carrot?

* Public transport investment
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #22 on: November 16, 2015, 09:41:52 »

He also found little evidence of modal shift following public transport investment: Build a tram system and people will use it, but any road space that gets freed up as a result will soon be used by more car journeys.
If investing in public transport doesn't create modal shift, what does?

More public transport investment, AND a system that discourages driving through pricing of parking and the like.   Example of Manhattan was quoted (and I have used the Subway and other services there and they provide a LOT of transport!)
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: November 16, 2015, 14:22:56 »

Apropos of nothing, here's an alternative solution:



So that's what happened to Totterdown...
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Western Pathfinder
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1528



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: November 16, 2015, 20:20:57 »

That would seem to be quite some temporary flyover !.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: November 16, 2015, 22:15:51 »

This was the plan that would have seen the harbour filled in wasn't it? Thank God for common sense, which at last took over.
Logged

Now, please!
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: November 16, 2015, 22:28:40 »

Is it too late to hope the same common sense will prevail over Metrobust?
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page