Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:15 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:21 Newbury to Bedwyn
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 13:18:07 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[153] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[97] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[41] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[38] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[37] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Cross Country Direct Award Consultation  (Read 12291 times)
readytostart
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 607


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: December 03, 2015, 13:34:33 »

One annoyance for me is that 1V60, the 0820 ABD-PNZ runs five minutes in front of a ScotRail semi-fast between Dundee and Edinburgh calling at the same stops, scooping up all of the passengers, both local and long distance. It's been like that for years and having worked for both companies I can say that the ScotRail is empty and the XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) full to bursting. Now common sense would say run the ScotRail in front and take stops out of the XC, with connections made at Haymarket, those making local journeys with little advance planning get to travel on a train with no reservations applied and those making longer journeys can hang back a bit and get on a train where they can actually reach their reserved seat!
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: December 03, 2015, 15:45:12 »

Like your comments RTS. This should happen all the way from Aberdeen to Plymouth. So you have locals in front from Aberdeen Edinburgh, Edinburgh Newcastle, Newcastle York, York Derby? Derby Birmingham, Birmingham Bristol, Bristol Plymouth and then the stopper folow the CC from Plymouth.

In the reverse direction the stopper is in front to Edinburgh and then follows to Aberdeen.
Logged
readytostart
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 607


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: December 03, 2015, 23:01:20 »

Like your comments RTS. This should happen all the way from Aberdeen to Plymouth. So you have locals in front from Aberdeen Edinburgh, Edinburgh Newcastle, Newcastle York, York Derby? Derby Birmingham, Birmingham Bristol, Bristol Plymouth and then the stopper folow the CC from Plymouth.

In the reverse direction the stopper is in front to Edinburgh and then follows to Aberdeen.

In the reverse there is an 1800 ScotRail to Dundee, unfortunately it's usually delayed by a local jeopardising the onward connection from XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) at Aberdeen for Dyce and Inverurie - as a direct service from the North East (of England that is!) the train carries a lot of offshore workers needing the airport at Dyce.
Another irritation is that peak restrictions finish at 1809, the XC is 1810!
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #18 on: December 04, 2015, 07:02:06 »

A couple of years back, I quite often used the CrossCountry train that arrived into Temple Meads at 20:38 and I connected into the 20:49 Weymouth service (I think my memory serves me right - the timing was certainly just inside the official connection time for Temple Meads).   A useful connection, but it must have been a bit of a nightmare for staff on those days that the XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) was running a bit late - indeed I have been part of such an incident where about a dozen people were left stranded.  Delay blamed on XC by FGW (First Great Western) staff as then was, even though the XC had been on time until quite close to Bristol where it had gotten behind a late running FGW local which had caused the delay (which may, of course, in turn have been held up by Arrival Trains Wales at Gloucester  Cheesy ).

Anyway - problem solved.  The XC is now scheduled into Bristol Temple Meads at 20:41, meaning that this no longer counts as a connection and the rail industry can now say "tough - your problem!" to anyone who sets off from Birmingham for Weymouth at the time they always have, and finds they can no longer get beyond Frome ...

I'm not offering an alternative solution - rather a need to consider / be aware of onward connections, especially if the drive is towards XC trains not making more local stops.   The accountant's compensation culture solution is to time / schedule the XC services to arrive just after the last available connecting time at key stations, and I suppose that helps relieve overcrowding too.  But it's a pretty negative approach ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: December 04, 2015, 10:13:04 »

Re connections Graham you have hit the nail on the head. The problem is that the "bean counters" have never been able to cost a Network as a whole rather than indiviual legs. Thus the potential of  connections is not factored into the costings for a particular train. This is exacerbated in your Birmingham Weymouth example by having to two different TOCS who in theory are supposed to compete with each other and all the complictions of splitting the revenue from the ticket.

Although BR (British Rail(ways)) was not beyond such tactics. My friend ran the Regent Street Travel Centre and increased the revenue quite considerably. Unfortunately it came under the Southern for pay and rations and the revenue. Most of the tickets sold were to Tourists to York and Edinburgh on the HSTs (High Speed Train). The Eastern Region got it closed because they were not getting the revenue.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18896



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: December 04, 2015, 10:25:07 »

A couple of years back, I quite often used the CrossCountry train that arrived into Temple Meads at 20:38 and I connected into the 20:49 Weymouth service (I think my memory serves me right - the timing was certainly just inside the official connection time for Temple Meads).   A useful connection, but it must have been a bit of a nightmare for staff on those days that the XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) was running a bit late - indeed I have been part of such an incident where about a dozen people were left stranded.  Delay blamed on XC by FGW (First Great Western) staff as then was, even though the XC had been on time until quite close to Bristol where it had gotten behind a late running FGW local which had caused the delay (which may, of course, in turn have been held up by Arrival Trains Wales at Gloucester  Cheesy ).

I'm not offering an alternative solution - rather a need to consider / be aware of onward connections, especially if the drive is towards XC trains not making more local stops.   The accountant's compensation culture solution is to time / schedule the XC services to arrive just after the last available connecting time at key stations, and I suppose that helps relieve overcrowding too.  But it's a pretty negative approach ...

Looking back through old timetables it appears that the CrossCountry arrival has been at 2040 or later since they took over the franchise in late 2007. Prior to that, in Virgin Cross Country days, it was as early as 2036. That's more than a couple of years back though. At first glance it would appear that the conspiracy theory is correct if you look back nearly 10 years. Arriva CrossCountry had changed their timetable and an official connection to the Weymouth train at 2049 was no longer possible.

However, in 2008, a couple of years after First Great Western had taken over from Wessex Trains, changes were made to the timetable for services from Great Malvern to Bristol. The 4 a day services from Great Malvern (two to Gloucester only), in Wessex Trains days, were increased to 6 a day (all to Bristol or beyond) and evenly spread. This included a service departing Great Malvern at 1854 (today 1850) that runs ahead of the CrossCountry service arriving in Bristol at 2037 (now 2039). That train has taken the path of the CrossCountry service as it nears Bristol TM(resolve), pushing the XC arrival into Bristol TM back to 2040 or 2041.

So, the reality is that changes to First Great Western's timetable mean that the 1912 from Birmingham (formerly the 1910) now cannot arrive any earlier. Throughout the day its the same. A GWR (Great Western Railway) service from either Great Malvern, Worcester, Cheltenham or Gloucester runs just ahead of the xx12 XC departures from Birmingham as they approach Bristol.

Easy to blame CrossCountry for their being no official connection between their 2041 arrival at Bristol TM to the 2049 GWR to Weymouth, but misplaced blame I feel.

I'll offer a potential solution. How about getting GWR to move the Weymouth departure back to 2051? After all it is they (in FGW guise) whose changes in 2008 now prevent earlier XC arrivals in Bristol TM. I can't see any junction or path conflicts between Bristol and Westbury. At Westbury the 2049 ex Bristol TM it currently dwells for 5 minutes. That could be reduced to 3 and then its back to its current timings from there.

Finally, I wasn't aware that it was the accountants or the compensation culture that dictated timetables. Surely that's down to Network Rail and the operators. CrossCountry are always in a somewhat invidious position. Their services have to be threaded between multiple different TOCs (Train Operating Company)' local services as the head up and down the country. There are always going to be some connections that are either just outside official interchange times or ones that leave passengers with a long wait. Blame for poor connections should not be laid at their door.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2015, 10:40:06 by bignosemac » Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #21 on: December 04, 2015, 12:34:00 »

Easy to blame CrossCountry for their being no official connection between their 2041 arrival at Bristol TM(resolve) to the 2049 GWR (Great Western Railway) to Weymouth, but misplaced blame I feel.

Noting your timings ... it certainly was an official connection when I was using it a couple of years back, but agreed it's gone in and out.   I wasn't intending to come across as attributing blame, but rather reporting on the blame attribution that went on when it was official and failed to connect.

Quote
I'll offer a potential solution. How about getting GWR to move the Weymouth departure back to 2051? After all it is they (in FGW (First Great Western) guise) whose changes in 2008 now prevent earlier XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) arrivals in Bristol TM. I can't see any junction or path conflicts between Bristol and Westbury. At Westbury the 2049 ex Bristol TM it currently dwells for 5 minutes. That could be reduced to 3 and then its back to its current timings from there.

I have made that suggestion is the past, but I suspect it's gone into the "too many suggestions, too little time to explore them seriously" bucket, or another section of the long-grass field. Certainly not heard a good reason why not.

Quote
Finally, I wasn't aware that it was the accountants or the compensation culture that dictated timetables. Surely that's down to Network Rail and the operators. CrossCountry are always in a somewhat invidious position. Their services have to be threaded between multiple different TOCs (Train Operating Company)' local services as the head up and down the country. There are always going to be some connections that are either just outside official interchange times or ones that leave passengers with a long wait. Blame for poor connections should not be laid at their door.

I would go along with "blame for poor connections should not always be laid at their door".  There's no way that everything can connect with everything else - but at the same time there are occasions where the TOCs and NR» (Network Rail - home page) together could do better.   And we've had discussions on here before about recovery times at certain points in journeys to help end-of-journey stats, and public and working timetables differing. 

As a matter of interest, I looked back at the now-non-connection at Bristol as an example over the last few days

* On Monday, it connected.  However, passengers from north of Birmingham would have been disappointed because the train from Scotland terminated an hour later there, with a fresh train found for passengers heading further south

* On Tuesday, the train from Birmingham arrived 30 seconds before the Weymouth left. I'm pretty sure that was a miss

* On Wednesday, it missed by 5 minutes

* On Thursday, it connected (just)

Clearly, not advertised, not official, not recommended these days.  But on previous official uses, it was officially recommended ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18896



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: December 04, 2015, 14:06:58 »

I stand, partially, corrected.

May '12 to Dec '12 and Dec '12 to May '13 timetables do indeed have the XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) arrival at 2039. Either side of those its 2040 or later.

Perhaps CrossCountry tried to make the connection work, but realised that following a stopper that closely wasn't sustainable.

Had the FGW (First Great Western) timetable recast in 2008 not put the ex Gt Malvern in the way then maybe the connection could have been maintained permanently.

Looks like CrossCountry tried it for one year. Then realised it couldn't be sustained.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page