Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:35 19 Apr 2024
* Children among nine dead in Russia strike on Ukraine
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
09:59 Cardiff Central to Taunton
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
12:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
12:54 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
09:27 Carmarthen to London Paddington
11:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
16:31 Barnstaple to Axminster
Delayed
08:28 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
09:23 Swansea to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2024, 11:44:34 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[137] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[56] Signage - not making it easy ...
[11] IETs at Melksham
[10] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
[9] From Melksham to Tallinn (and back round The Baltic) by train
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
  Print  
Author Topic: Rumour of HSTs to operate Cardiff-Portsmouth discounted - probably Class 165/166 instead  (Read 48784 times)
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #60 on: July 13, 2016, 16:25:18 »

So, would you like me to update this topic's heading again, or not?  Grin

The current heading is as advised by an engineering manager. I think it's a good bet!
A good bet maybe, but the rumours seems to be changing at a rate of knots. If I were to suggest re-naming it would be something like "Rumour of HSTs (High Speed Train) to operate Cardiff-Portsmouth discounted - who knows what else instead".

This from WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) forum:
Quote from: Ingleborough
All change;

All 21 class 166 to be allocated to Bristol plus 'most' of the two car 165s. All three car 165s remain at Reading. 166s to be all standard class with some seating rearranged.

Officially all 153s to go off lease, unofficially the five Porterbrook 153s are remaining.

My source isn't a rumour, but current actual plans straight from the horses mouth! Of course plans may change if further delays or issues with electrification.
The current official plans is 1 tp2h 2+4 HST Penzance -Cardiff/Bristol. 165/6 Cardiff-Portsmouth. These are of course subject to change

Is this the latest.  I thought the 158 Fleet was going to be formed back into 2 Car Sets to enable the Cardiff to Portsmouths  to be worked by 2 x 2 Car Units. (4 Cars).   Still, if this bit or that bit of the jigsaw slips back, plans can change day by day.
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3461

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #61 on: July 13, 2016, 16:57:28 »

So, would you like me to update this topic's heading again, or not?  Grin

The current heading is as advised by an engineering manager. I think it's a good bet!
A good bet maybe, but the rumours seems to be changing at a rate of knots. If I were to suggest re-naming it would be something like "Rumour of HSTs (High Speed Train) to operate Cardiff-Portsmouth discounted - who knows what else instead".

This from WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) forum:
Quote from: Ingleborough
All change;

All 21 class 166 to be allocated to Bristol plus 'most' of the two car 165s. All three car 165s remain at Reading. 166s to be all standard class with some seating rearranged.

Officially all 153s to go off lease, unofficially the five Porterbrook 153s are remaining.

My source isn't a rumour, but current actual plans straight from the horses mouth! Of course plans may change if further delays or issues with electrification.
The current official plans is 1 tp2h 2+4 HST Penzance -Cardiff/Bristol. 165/6 Cardiff-Portsmouth. These are of course subject to change

Is this the latest.  I thought the 158 Fleet was going to be formed back into 2 Car Sets to enable the Cardiff to Portsmouths  to be worked by 2 x 2 Car Units. (4 Cars).   Still, if this bit or that bit of the jigsaw slips back, plans can change day by day.

Latest as of 24th June.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #62 on: July 13, 2016, 17:07:10 »

Cardiff - Penzance on a hst I don't will be such a bad idea especially when you compare them to clas 150/1's that have 3+2 seating which I don't really like.
Assuming that Cardiff-Penzance would be an extension of the Cardiff-Taunton stoppers, it seems a bit silly to use IC125s on it which, being loco-hauled, probably won't be as quick off the mark as, say, a 5-car AT300 bi-mode (whether 800 or 802, although the 800's fuel tanks might not be big enough). If you're going to go to the trouble of making IC125s compliant with 2020 regs, surely they might as well keep them as 2+8 sets and use them on limited-stop services out of Paddington as was planned before the class 802 order.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #63 on: July 13, 2016, 17:17:25 »

If you're going to go to the trouble of making IC125s compliant with 2020 regs, surely they might as well keep them as 2+8 sets and use them on limited-stop services out of Paddington as was planned before the class 802 order.

Or you might want to use a common fleet of 800 series trains with pretty much identical and interchangeable performance into Paddington.   

You just never give up about keeping HSTs (High Speed Train), you are a stuck record on this subject, and I doubt DfT» (Department for Transport - about) or GWR (Great Western Railway) are listening to you.

Paul
Logged
rogerw
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1338



View Profile
« Reply #64 on: July 13, 2016, 18:25:53 »

I hope that 158s are retained on theh Cardiff - Portsmouth service.  In my view the use of 165/6 with the 3 + 2 seating would be a retrograde step on a long distance service. Further the lack inter-unit gangways could also cause problems with localised overcrowding
Logged

I like to travel.  It lets me feel I'm getting somewhere.
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #65 on: July 13, 2016, 18:46:44 »

I hope that 158s are retained on theh Cardiff - Portsmouth service.  In my view the use of 165/6 with the 3 + 2 seating would be a retrograde step on a long distance service. Further the lack inter-unit gangways could also cause problems with localised overcrowding

I think someone mentioned earlier in the thread that the 3+2 seating would be modified when these units move west. The 158's are desperately short on leg room though, so be careful what you wish for!

I think the ideal solution for this sort of route would be something like ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company)))'s class 175 - airconditioned, good top speed and fabulous amount of legroom for a modern train - not sure if they could do an interior refit on the 16x's to provide the sort of legroom found in the 175's (I suspect the number of door openings might be an issue), but some thought needs to be put in to this as the current 3+2 bay seating isn't the best suited to mid-distance routes imo.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #66 on: July 13, 2016, 19:30:58 »

Or some of the soon to be surplus 185s from TPE (Trans Pennine Express) - though the better the internal layout, the more carriages you need!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #67 on: July 14, 2016, 00:38:37 »

The 185's would be an eminently sensible choice too, although what strikes me about the 175's is that there is ample leg space without apparently forfeiting too many seats (which imho are amongst the comfiest on the uk rail network currently), although obvious downside of increased dwell time at busy stops due to the doors being in the carriage ends.

Going off on a slight tangent, I wonder if ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) might collect (some of) the 185's as they'd be a good fit for many of their longer distance routes which will not see electrification any time soon and also the Maesteg to Cheltenham services which currently must be an endurance test in a rattly old 150!
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page