Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:55 28 Mar 2024
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
* Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
18:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
18:04 Bedwyn to Newbury
18:08 London Paddington to Frome
18:26 Newbury to Bedwyn
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
18:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
18:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
14:49 Plymouth to Cardiff Central
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:30 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
Delayed
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
Additional 17:17 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 17:57:51 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[132] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[53] Return of the BRUTE?
[44] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 20
  Print  
Author Topic: GWR Performance Figures  (Read 113222 times)
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7745



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: July 05, 2016, 08:00:49 »

Once a revised timetable announced, delays are marked against that, rather than the original timetable. So the Cardiff cancellations would be excluded, once GWR (Great Western Railway) had announced they would only run once an hour, for example

Seriously???

You really couldn't make it up could you? So were there any void days as a result?
Logged
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 711


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: July 05, 2016, 10:44:56 »

Maybe I'll raise this at the next Meet The Manager session.
Oh no, I can't, because they cancelled all means of face to face contact.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: July 05, 2016, 11:08:31 »

Yes, I thought that was the case.  How long does it take for those exclusion rules to apply though? 

Overnight. Published the evening before for the following day is good enough.

Also, bear in mind that the public PPM(resolve) charter figures are *peak* trains only, so nothing after 1900 affects the stats. There is an all-day measure, but that is not the charter discount PPM.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: July 05, 2016, 11:22:18 »

Also, bear in mind that the public PPM(resolve) charter figures are *peak* trains only, so nothing after 1900 affects the stats. There is an all-day measure, but that is not the charter discount PPM.

Yes, I was forgetting that.  Given the incident happened mid way through the peak, that would probably explain why the figures held up so well.  Bring on 'Delay Repay' I say, as there's no way such a large, disruptive incident should have such a small effect on the figures used to determine renewal discounts for season tickets.  And I agree that a void day should have been declared, as per the definition GWR (Great Western Railway) themselves provide - is it too late for that to happen?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: July 05, 2016, 11:29:26 »

Yes - as the day's figures would then be excluded from the Charter PPM(resolve) stats.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #20 on: July 05, 2016, 11:32:41 »

Careful what you wish for - While Delay/Repay would get seasons compensation for this sort of an event, regular poor performance of over 10mins but less than 30mins affects the charter PPM(resolve), but would render zilch on Delay/Repay.....so under this scheme seasons might get 5% renewal discount, under delay/repay, there would be nowt.

It works both ways unfortunately.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: July 05, 2016, 11:38:33 »

Careful what you wish for

I wish for a fairer system for passengers - one that reflects delays which they experience.  Apart from the 5% LTV (London [and] Thames Valley) discount, no other GWR (Great Western Railway) season is discounting (or even close to hitting the discount trigger), so whilst there may be the odd loser (a Slough to Windsor commuter for example), it's a far fairer system for the majority.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #22 on: July 05, 2016, 11:54:26 »

*IF* they suffer the odd long delay, yes.

But regular poor timekeeping (of the type LTV (London [and] Thames Valley) are suffering, hence the 5% discount) of less than 30mins will mean that they can lose out quite easily
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7745



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: July 05, 2016, 13:26:29 »

So really then these performance figures don't reflect the chaotic reality which the derailment caused, they reflect the rest of the month along with a few days of performance against an "amended timetable"?

It'd be interesting to see the true picture, incorporating all the cancellations and delays which the incident caused.

This seems to be a very handy "Get out of jail free" card for GWR (Great Western Railway) - if there's serious disruption which will knacker your stats, simply declare an "amended timetable" and be measured against that rather than what actually happened?
Logged
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 711


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: July 05, 2016, 13:52:01 »

Sounds like it is more efficient for GWR (Great Western Railway) to have an elite team of timetable writers and a good relationship with the print room than to try and run a train service to schedule. 😉
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #25 on: July 05, 2016, 14:07:15 »

This seems to be a very handy "Get out of jail free" card for GWR (Great Western Railway) - if there's serious disruption which will knacker your stats, simply declare an "amended timetable" and be measured against that rather than what actually happened?

Not just GWR - them's the rules written into each franchise. Gets the taxpayer more money from the franchise process, doncha know.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: July 05, 2016, 14:43:54 »

It'd be interesting to see the true picture, incorporating all the cancellations and delays which the incident caused.

You can get much more information on the all day PPM(resolve) scores here, see the 'Daily' and 'Recent Performance' tabs, but I'm pretty sure it was around 3000 delay minutes and 200 cancellations for the first day of the disuption.

https://www.firstgroup.com/uktrain/kpi/gw/
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: August 04, 2016, 14:40:33 »

Latest graph attached.  Not an especially impressive month of stats, especially for HSS (High Speed Services) at only 86.8%, but the LTV (London [and] Thames Valley) MAA (Moving Annual Average) has risen by 0.4% so it must've been a lot better than this time last year.

Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: September 02, 2016, 15:06:17 »

Latest graph attached.  A pretty good month of figures given the widespread service alterations as a result of the engineering blockade at Hinksey.  The LTV (London [and] Thames Valley) figure exceeded the charter discount trigger for only the second time this year.

Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: September 26, 2016, 17:23:53 »

Latest graph attached and it was a pretty awful period, with LTV (London [and] Thames Valley) services barely recording 80% and HSS (High Speed Services) only a couple of percentage points better.  The Moving Annual Average also took quite a hit as a result.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 20
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page