Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:15 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:08 Newbury to Bedwyn
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
10:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:41 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 09:28:26 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[159] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[68] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[63] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[62] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[38] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
  Print  
Author Topic: 1903 Paddington - Plymouth 24th March  (Read 40009 times)
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 589


View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: March 25, 2016, 19:24:46 »

After my experience four weeks ago getting the Swansea bound train, 1915/Friday, I can sympathise.

The issue has to be addressed by GWR (Great Western Railway)/Paddington.

The options are allow 50-100 saver plus ticket holders on earlier trains if space is available.

Limit boarding of the train and ignore reservation tickets. If you can't get to the station at time of boarding should the train staff keep a reservation on an overcrowded train? I have been on loads of trains when reserved seats have been empty because people do not turn up.

Add extra train 15 minutes later.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 25, 2016, 19:47:01 »

I do believe pax mostly have brains & they can always choose to travel on different services?

Why should an operator do the thinking for pax? Extremely few of those travellers will be first time travellers over busy periods & thus chose freely to board that service. I do have some sympathy for GWR (Great Western Railway) in this instance.

If pax can't be arsed to reserve in advance, why should GWR force them to?

Some customers cant "choose to travel on different services" because they have advance tickets that are valid on the booked train only and would face a huge "fine" for use of an alternative service.

Not certain how reserving in advance would help ?  I tried that on the 18-03 on a Maundy Thursday a few years ago ! My booked seat was occupied by someone else who simply refused to move, a regular problem on grossly overcrowded services. The train staff felt unable to intervene, so being reluctant to give the usurper a thump I had to stand to Taunton. Never again !
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 25, 2016, 19:49:17 »

The options are allow 50-100 saver plus ticket holders on earlier trains if space is available.

That would be extremely difficult to enforce. Effectively you would be saying that saver tickets are valid on earlier trains. Result make aearlier trains even worse.

Limit boarding of the train

Limit the boarding of the train if you can. I am not sure how easy it would be if there are two trains boarding on opposite platforms.  

and ignore reservation tickets. If you can't get to the station at time of boarding should the train staff keep a reservation on an overcrowded train? I have been on loads of trains when reserved seats have been empty because people do not turn up.

No that is the last thing to do.  Stop on-line sales automatically giving reservations with anything but advance fares unless requested. The problem is people who have already travelled.

I see a possibility for an electronic solution in another age, where the use of (an electronic) ticket on an earlier train would cancel the later reservation.  

Add extra train 15 minutes later.

On this occasion that is what they did, but people always want to catch the first train they can.  

More practical (perhaps) solutions:

1) Make these trains reservation only.
2) Make the first train (rather than the relief) not stop at Reading as the relief train can cater for these passengers.

Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40691



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #18 on: March 25, 2016, 20:05:38 »

1) Make these trains reservation only.

<advocate mode="devil">But doesn't that limit a train with 500 seats to 500 passengers rather than allowing a reasonable level of standing?  And with reservations being available free of charge and with a significant proportion not being taken up, might you not find that the actual number of passengers carried was more like 350 even if it was fully reserved?</advocate>
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 25, 2016, 20:24:33 »

As improved capacity is still the usual "few years" away, it seems that all that can be done is to manage demand, or put bluntly price people off busy trains.
I am not convinced that ANY discounted advance tickets should be sold for services that are going to be overcrowded. I thought that the purpose of selling heavily discounted advance tickets was to fill seats that would otherwise go unused ? and not to make an already overcrowded train even worse ?

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 26, 2016, 07:04:13 »

It was a similar story on the East Coast line both on Thursday and yesterday with services very heavily loaded. I'm sure other lines out of London would have been the same. So many wanting to travel long distance at the same time with little/no spare capacity to bring out at times such as Easter. It's the same every year.
Logged
old original
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 877


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 26, 2016, 07:28:33 »

I think made slightly worse by the early Easter as near all schools and colleges broke up on Thursday and most people want to get to where they're going by the weekend. If Easter weekend falls in the middle of the holiday period, people could vary their travel dates a bit more so perhaps the idea in the news this morning about fixing Easter could be beneficial, in this case....
Logged

8 Billion people on a wet rock - of course we're not happy
plymothian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 822


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 26, 2016, 07:34:48 »

Not necessarily so as Maundy Thursday is the busiest travel day of the year across all modes of transport, regardless of whether it falls within/at the start/near the end of the Easter school holidays.  This has been known and publicised for years.
Logged

Please be aware that only the first 4 words of this post will be platformed on this message board.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7748



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: March 26, 2016, 08:52:14 »

As improved capacity is still the usual "few years" away, it seems that all that can be done is to manage demand, or put bluntly price people off busy trains.
I am not convinced that ANY discounted advance tickets should be sold for services that are going to be overcrowded. I thought that the purpose of selling heavily discounted advance tickets was to fill seats that would otherwise go unused ? and not to make an already overcrowded train even worse ?



I don't disagree - although it won't go down well, especially after the much heralded stripping out of First class -it'd be interesting to know how many "cheap" tickets were sold as a proportion on the trains which were always going to be overcrowded on Thursday (and yesterday was no better it would seem in terms of severe overcrowding)

That needs to be added to additional measures such as more proactive boarding management from GWR (Great Western Railway) when things are obviously starting to get silly - we need to move the attitude of shrugging the shoulders and saying "It's Easter/Summer/Christmas/major sporting event" etc etc, all of which are generally fixed in the calendar year after year - really it's just about planning.

In that way, GWR might not get caught with their pants down quite so much.

Out of interest, taking London - Plymouth as an example, given a similar service pattern, how many seats will be added by the new trains?
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 965


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: March 26, 2016, 08:54:36 »

It was a similar story on the East Coast line both on Thursday and yesterday with services very heavily loaded. I'm sure other lines out of London would have been the same. So many wanting to travel long distance at the same time with little/no spare capacity to bring out at times such as Easter. It's the same every year.

Exactly, these were pictures I found on social media of Virgin East Coast and West Coast services so it's not a problem confined to just GWR (Great Western Railway).  It all goes back to the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) who haven't got a strategy to cope with growth
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7748



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: March 26, 2016, 09:04:02 »

I don't think anyone is suggesting that the problem is confined to GWR (Great Western Railway) - but it would be interesting to know if they have a strategy to cope with severe overcrowding, other than just letting more and more people pile on?
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 965


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: March 26, 2016, 09:20:51 »

I would say from those pictures the answer would be no!!  Although having said that I've heard the Pendolinos on the West Coast have a weight limit on them whereby the brakes will not release if that limit is exceeded. If that's true I suppose it could relate to the tilt mechanism.
Passengers have put themselves on those trains, how many would willingly leave it though if asked??
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7748



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: March 26, 2016, 09:32:26 »

I would say from those pictures the answer would be no!!  Although having said that I've heard the Pendolinos on the West Coast have a weight limit on them whereby the brakes will not release if that limit is exceeded. If that's true I suppose it could relate to the tilt mechanism.
Passengers have put themselves on those trains, how many would willingly leave it though if asked??

......exactly - which proves that prevention is always better than cure - hence the discussion above re: demand/boarding management.
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 965


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: March 26, 2016, 09:38:00 »

I would say from those pictures the answer would be no!!  Although having said that I've heard the Pendolinos on the West Coast have a weight limit on them whereby the brakes will not release if that limit is exceeded. If that's true I suppose it could relate to the tilt mechanism.
Passengers have put themselves on those trains, how many would willingly leave it though if asked??

......exactly - which proves that prevention is always better than cure - hence the discussion above re: demand/boarding management.

But would it?  Once passengers become aware that there will be boarding limits boarding a train itself will become dangerous, a survival of the fittest.  The surge at Euston when boarding is announced is frightening.  VT (Virgin Trains - former franchises) will wait until the train is full and then ask passengers to leave the service.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7748



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: March 26, 2016, 09:43:03 »

I would say from those pictures the answer would be no!!  Although having said that I've heard the Pendolinos on the West Coast have a weight limit on them whereby the brakes will not release if that limit is exceeded. If that's true I suppose it could relate to the tilt mechanism.
Passengers have put themselves on those trains, how many would willingly leave it though if asked??

......exactly - which proves that prevention is always better than cure - hence the discussion above re: demand/boarding management.

But would it?  Once passengers become aware that there will be boarding limits boarding a train itself will become dangerous, a survival of the fittest.  The surge at Euston when boarding is announced is frightening.  VT (Virgin Trains - former franchises) will wait until the train is full and then ask passengers to leave the service.

OK we're at cross purposes - this thread primarily concerns GWR (Great Western Railway) through Paddington.........however the situation you describe sounds even worse!
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page