Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 00:35 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningShort Run
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 00:42:44 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[98] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[97] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[86] Return of the BRUTE?
[74] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[23] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 63
  Print  
Author Topic: MetroBus  (Read 236486 times)
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #90 on: June 26, 2017, 23:12:39 »

I think the double-decker bit might be a mistake, I don't believe that they will fit under the Ashton Ave bridge, unless they are a modern twist on the Lodekka

I have read in Another Place that Ashton Avenue bridge is too low for double deckers by a factor or 80mm.

After my fleeting excursion into the Far East (Cheesy) as far as I can see the Cambridge guided busway and the Metrobus scheme are not comparable. Taking over a dead-straight railway bed through the countryside is one thing but the meanderings around and through an urban area of the Greater Bristol scheme, even allowing for some reserved roads, is it's own Creature (as per Ms Shelley's usage in her novel).

A point I have been making for several years. Cambridge's BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) is 16 miles long in two guided sections, although that hasn't prevented at least 5 serious accidents, including one fatality. It connects the city centre and science park with a couple of centres of population. Bristol's MetroBust is largely unguided (and definitely misguided), with the guided bit being 2.4 miles in 9 separate bits, with no possibility of any extension. That must make it the shortest guided busway in the world. It connects a park and ride that previously needed a subsidy of £700,000 pa, going to near Temple Meads (5 minutes walk for a fit person) via a circuitous route taking in a housing estate that has enough elderly and disabled residents to bump up the BCR (Benefit Cost Ratio) a bit.

Quote
I'm not sure what to expect from our Brave New World of buses, but I do know one thing - cheaper it may be, but it is not a satisfactory substitute for light rail.

Hear hear! Opportunity missed.
Logged

Now, please!
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #91 on: June 29, 2017, 01:41:01 »


... the Lodekka

Pint?
Logged

Now, please!
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 514


View Profile
« Reply #92 on: June 29, 2017, 10:00:56 »

Quote
I'm not sure what to expect from our Brave New World of buses, but I do know one thing - cheaper it may be, but it is not a satisfactory substitute for light rail.

Indeed, and to a large extent I believe that's down to the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) only offering money for BRT (Bus Rapid Transit)
Logged
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2257


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #93 on: June 29, 2017, 11:33:04 »

Quote
I'm not sure what to expect from our Brave New World of buses, but I do know one thing - cheaper it may be, but it is not a satisfactory substitute for light rail.

Indeed, and to a large extent I believe that's down to the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) only offering money for BRT (Bus Rapid Transit)

It could be argued that Metrobust is a punishment for earlier squabbling and the subsequent failure to secure the tram funding ten or so years ago.
Logged
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1499


View Profile
« Reply #94 on: June 29, 2017, 12:55:31 »

Put the blame fairly and squarely on Lady Dawn Primarolo who scuppered Richard Cotterill's ATA plans 20 years earlier.
Logged
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2257


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #95 on: July 06, 2017, 16:57:09 »

Cost increase and resignation.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-40512758
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #96 on: July 06, 2017, 19:23:56 »

It could be argued that Metrobust is a punishment for earlier squabbling and the subsequent failure to secure the tram funding ten or so years ago.

It has indeed been argued! One of my favourite theories.


Quote
Chris Sane left South Gloucestershire Council days before it emerged the cost of building the North Fringe to Hengrove route had risen £4.6m since November.

The only Sane man amongst them. I hope his is not the only head to roll.
Logged

Now, please!
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #97 on: July 06, 2017, 19:27:03 »


Hey ho. They're still nowhere near matching the Edinburgh Trams Debacle
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #98 on: July 06, 2017, 20:22:36 »

Hey ho. They're still nowhere near matching the Edinburgh Trams Debacle

Yes, but note from Wikipedia

Quote
In its first year of operation 4.92 million passengers travelled on the system.This increased to 5.38 million in its second year of operation. This is 6.7% greater than the target set before the system's launch.

During 2014 Edinburgh Trams lost almost £450,000, though this was less than expected due to higher than predicted passenger numbers. In 2015 losses were down to £24,922. In June 2017 it was announced that Edinburgh Trams made a pre-tax profit of £252,000 for 2016. A loss of £170,000 had been predicted. This meant that Edinburgh Trams had achieved profitability two years ahead of schedule.

So although we have seen multiple delays and overruns on the Metrobus, is there still not a chance when it's up and running people will love the smooth ride of the railed vehicles and flock to it in significant numbers ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #99 on: July 06, 2017, 22:16:37 »

This meant that Edinburgh Trams had achieved profitability two years ahead of schedule.

So although we have seen multiple delays and overruns on the Metrobus, is there still not a chance when it's up and running people will love the smooth ride of the railed vehicles and flock to it in significant numbers ...

Ha ha! I read in Railnews only today that tram passengers are more satisfied with their experience than bus or train pax, and that Edinburgh passengers reported 99% satisfaction with the service, the best figure in the UK (United Kingdom). I can but imagine what a reception MetroBust will get by comparison when it eventually arrives.
Logged

Now, please!
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #100 on: July 07, 2017, 09:09:58 »

Hey ho. They're still nowhere near matching the Edinburgh Trams Debacle

Yes, but note from Wikipedia

Quote
In its first year of operation 4.92 million passengers travelled on the system.This increased to 5.38 million in its second year of operation. This is 6.7% greater than the target set before the system's launch.

During 2014 Edinburgh Trams lost almost £450,000, though this was less than expected due to higher than predicted passenger numbers. In 2015 losses were down to £24,922. In June 2017 it was announced that Edinburgh Trams made a pre-tax profit of £252,000 for 2016. A loss of £170,000 had been predicted. This meant that Edinburgh Trams had achieved profitability two years ahead of schedule.

So although we have seen multiple delays and overruns on the Metrobus, is there still not a chance when it's up and running people will love the smooth ride of the railed vehicles and flock to it in significant numbers ...

Well yes. I suppose the key difference is that the Edinburgh Trams Debacle resulted in - well, trams.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #101 on: July 07, 2017, 09:16:28 »


Well yes. I suppose the key difference is that the Edinburgh Trams Debacle resulted in - well, trams.

Aye, and there's the rub.

I still reckon Comical Ali and the rest of the propaganda crew at MetroBust will come up with even better figures. South Gloucestershire were describing it as "the already successful MetroBust" system 6 months ago. I wrote in response asking how they measured that success - was it in buses running per hour (none), passengers carried (none), or operators appointed (you guessed it - none). Or whether it was in timeliness of the project (3 years late by one measure) or the keeping to budget (50% overspend).

I haven't heard back yet.
Logged

Now, please!
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 589


View Profile Email
« Reply #102 on: July 07, 2017, 10:24:17 »

The Metrobus overspend is almost totally within SGC, due in part to the two years of chaos in Bradley Stoke due to Gas and Water mains being at the wrong depth.

The road system in Bradley Stoke is still not back to normal with continued restrictions to Aztec West and Winterbourne!

Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #103 on: July 07, 2017, 10:59:27 »

I thought the roadworks around Aztec West were part of the measures to reduce the "pinch point" at the A38/M5 junction?
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 589


View Profile Email
« Reply #104 on: July 07, 2017, 11:20:16 »

Yes, this is about the 4th set of major upgrades over the past 10 years to improve the roundabout. Its odd that the all the previous ones have reduced capacity by adding confusing lane markings and signs.

One of the roads on Aztec West roundabout, Bradley Stoke Way has endured roadworks, lane restrictions, surface mounted water and gas pipes for over two years due to MetroBus, and still has restrictions. These may apply until the Aztech West roundabout is complete.

« Last Edit: July 07, 2017, 15:40:21 by simonw » Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 63
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page