Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
Read about the forum [here]. Register and contribute [here] - it's free.
Random Image
Train Running @GWR Twitter Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail News GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4 Chat on off
July 27, 2017, 09:34:29 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8]
  Print  
Author Topic: MetroBus  (Read 15984 times)
Four Track, Now!
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3010


I know nothing. Really.


View Profile Email
« Reply #105 on: July 07, 2017, 03:32:31 PM »

The Metrobus overspend is almost totally within SGC, due in part to the two years of chaos in Bradley Stoke due to Gas and Water mains being at the wrong depth.

The Ashton Vale to Somewhere Not Far From Temple Meads route had significant overruns. Ashton Avenue Bridge alone used up the entire estimate for bridge works. Usual scenario - "I know we said £1.5 million, but now we've started looking at it properly..."

The South Bristol Link Road did cost a bit more than the original estimate, but not a huge amount, unless costs have been hidden elsewhere.

The work to return the City Centre to something approaching one of its previous layouts has been such a mess that I reckon the final tab will be well over the initial quote, but we'll see. That part should have done some good, but it looks as though some of the benefit has already been lost by the rerouting of some of the buses because they can't turn left into Baldwin Street.

I wonder if Mr Sane has gone whilst his CV is still worth something. If it continues to get worse, and if passenger numbers are low if and when it opens, MetroBust might be the last thing any professional wants to be associated with.
Logged

Now, please!
Red Squirrel
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1431


Brexit simplified


View Profile
« Reply #106 on: July 13, 2017, 04:27:24 PM »


The Ashton Vale to Somewhere Not Far From Temple Meads route...


In the consultation phase of the Temple Circus Gyratory proposal, the South West Transport Network (who they?) observed:

Quote
The MetroBus bus stop is too far away from the main station platforms. Not enough bus lanes on Temple Way or Temple Gate and there is inadequate interchange for city bus services to the city centre, bus station, Stockwood, Brislington, Bath and Wells, Glastonbury and Street.

Bristol City Council's response was:

Quote
In the new design we have created a new bus stop area for the MetroBus, which is significantly closer to the station and is in direct line of sight of the proposed new entrance to Temple Meads via the Friary. We have examined the options to bring the MetroBus stop closer still, utilising space on the Friary. However, crossing the southbound carriageway adds significant time to the busís schedule which compromises the scheduleís ability to make time savings for passengers. This would also be likely to adversely impact the network.

Odd, isn't it? If MetroBus had been a tram, it would presumably have been given some sort of priority crossing to get it over Victoria Street and into the new transport interchange on Plot 6. Except it isn't, and Plot 6 looks like it'll be a shopping centre.

Oh, and I like the bit about the new bus stop being 'in direct line of sight of the proposed new entrance to Temple Meads'. Presumably it will also be in direct line of sight of the Moon, on a clear night, which is just as useful if you have heavy bags to carry.
Logged

To all who believe in it, I propose a simple experiment. Buy a cake, eat it, and see if it is still there on the plate.
Four Track, Now!
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3010


I know nothing. Really.


View Profile Email
« Reply #107 on: July 16, 2017, 10:14:51 AM »


The Ashton Vale to Somewhere Not Far From Temple Meads route...


In the consultation phase of the Temple Circus Gyratory proposal, the South West Transport Network (who they?) observed:

Who they indeed? Good question. South West Transport Network (SWTN) seems to be a loose alliance of exasperated and frustrated members of the public who do not think that public transport is being taken seriously by the various councils and by the Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP), the unelected unaccountable oligarchy that loves to sign other peoples' cheques. In the Bristol Area, SWTN's collective view is often expressed by the indomitable Dave Redgewell (speaking in a personal capacity) with passion, if not always grammatical accuracy. I think I went to a meeting they arranged once, and if I sounded a little patronising above, then I am happy to recognise the knowledge and vision of those present to whom I spoke. Though not subject to the financial constraints imposed upon the professionals, I would say that they knew what they were talking about. The ideas of many coincided with my own in several areas - not that I consider myself a visionary.  They also spotted the obvious defects built into MetroBust, including quite a few I hadn't noticed. At least they got it together to hire a room and hold a meeting.

MetroBust, along with the LEP, has shown itself adept at ignoring the views of individuals when "consulting" them (meaning telling them what they are doing then asking why they agree with it), but that is not good enough. They need to have representative bodies to express collective views that they can ignore, and to them, this appears to be the prime purpose of SWTN.

Quote
Quote
The MetroBus bus stop is too far away from the main station platforms. Not enough bus lanes on Temple Way or Temple Gate and there is inadequate interchange for city bus services to the city centre, bus station, Stockwood, Brislington, Bath and Wells, Glastonbury and Street.

Bristol City Council's response was:

Quote
In the new design we have created a new bus stop area for the MetroBus, which is significantly closer to the station and is in direct line of sight of the proposed new entrance to Temple Meads via the Friary. We have examined the options to bring the MetroBus stop closer still, utilising space on the Friary. However, crossing the southbound carriageway adds significant time to the busís schedule which compromises the scheduleís ability to make time savings for passengers. This would also be likely to adversely impact the network.

Odd, isn't it? If MetroBus had been a tram, it would presumably have been given some sort of priority crossing to get it over Victoria Street and into the new transport interchange on Plot 6. Except it isn't, and Plot 6 looks like it'll be a shopping centre.

Oh, and I like the bit about the new bus stop being 'in direct line of sight of the proposed new entrance to Temple Meads'. Presumably it will also be in direct line of sight of the Moon, on a clear night, which is just as useful if you have heavy bags to carry.

Hear hear! This is supposed to be integrated transport, something that will not be achieved by mere sophistry. My route to Temple Meads begins* with a "three stop hop" from Arnos Vale, surely the best value ride in Bristol, on the number 1 or X39 or whatever. I then have to cross the road and ascend the station approach - no great hardship when in plenty of time and unencumbered, but a real faff on a rainy day with suitcases and the clock moving forward at an unnatural pace. Never mind that you can see the (as yet unbuilt) new entrance to the station with a reasonable pair of binoculars as you get off the (as yet un-running) MetroBust, it will still be around 200 metres further away from my current stop from either the existing or the proposed entrance. Is it arrogance, incompetence or mission creep that leads to the jaw-dropper of a statement:

Quote
However, crossing the southbound carriageway adds significant time to the busís schedule which compromises the scheduleís ability to make time savings for passengers. This would also be likely to adversely impact the network.

If the mountain won't come to Muhammad, then Muhammad had better catch MetroBust and walk the rest of the way. Sod the bus - crossing the southbound carriageway adds significant time to the pedestrian's journey. The plan should be to disgorge the happy passengers by a covered walkway to the platforms, closer than one can get by any other means. Any other option for getting people to a major public transport terminus is utterly ridiculous. Do they not recognise the irony of adding to peoples' walking distance, and therefore costing them time, so that they can safeguard:

Quote
...the scheduleís ability to make time savings for passengers
Huh Shades of Jim Hacker in "Yes Minister", and the saga of the hospital that was Britain's most efficient until it started admitting patients.

The convoluted route of MetroBust, designed to tick boxes rather than meet passenger needs, is the problem. There is little point in getting to Temple Way from Ashton Vale in 17 minutes if it takes a further 17 minutes to get to the station.

The point about trams having priority is well made, and is far from pure theory. All the tram systems operating in Britain, with the possible exception of Seaton, have built in priority over other vehicles where their routes cross. Even in the bustling commercial centre that is the 12 miles between Starr Gate, Blackpool, and Fleetwood is this obvious. As the tram moves away from Cleveleys tram stop, to pick one of many examples where road and tramway cross away from the central section, the traffic lights change in its favour, and the tram signal changes to allow it to proceed across a busy junction without having to stop. Normal business for road traffic is resumed with such little delay as to inconvenience nobody.

The walk from Blackpool North to the tram stop, incidentally, is a little further than that from bus stop to Temple Meads entrance, but still results in a quicker journey than using the bus. I had a word with someone, and the council has now agreed to rebuild the tram line up Talbot Road to the station for me.

*(Only until 11 August)
« Last Edit: July 16, 2017, 10:47:58 AM by Four Track, Now! » Logged

Now, please!
trainer
TransWilts Member
Hero Member
******
Posts: 921


View Profile
« Reply #108 on: July 16, 2017, 10:52:59 PM »

There is little point in getting to Temple Way from Ashton Vale in 17 minutes if it takes a further 17 minutes to get to the station.

I suppose we could always press for a bus service between the metrobus stop and somewhere people would like to go.   Roll Eyes 

No-one with luggage or with restricted walking ability will find such a distance to the railway station encouraging the use of the new bus.  I hope they're not going to stop the other buses going up the ramp.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 850


View Profile Email
« Reply #109 on: July 17, 2017, 10:55:14 AM »

Hear hear! This is supposed to be integrated transport, something that will not be achieved by mere sophistry. My route to Temple Meads begins* with a "three stop hop" from Arnos Vale, surely the best value ride in Bristol, on the number 1 or X39 or whatever. I then have to cross the road and ascend the station approach - no great hardship when in plenty of time and unencumbered, but a real faff on a rainy day with suitcases and the clock moving forward at an unnatural pace. Never mind that you can see the (as yet unbuilt) new entrance to the station with a reasonable pair of binoculars as you get off the (as yet un-running) MetroBust, it will still be around 200 metres further away from my current stop from either the existing or the proposed entrance. Is it arrogance, incompetence or mission creep that leads to the jaw-dropper of a statement:

Quote
However, crossing the southbound carriageway adds significant time to the busís schedule which compromises the scheduleís ability to make time savings for passengers. This would also be likely to adversely impact the network.

If the mountain won't come to Muhammad, then Muhammad had better catch MetroBust and walk the rest of the way. Sod the bus - crossing the southbound carriageway adds significant time to the pedestrian's journey. The plan should be to disgorge the happy passengers by a covered walkway to the platforms, closer than one can get by any other means. Any other option for getting people to a major public transport terminus is utterly ridiculous. Do they not recognise the irony of adding to peoples' walking distance, and therefore costing them time, so that they can safeguard:

Quote
...the scheduleís ability to make time savings for passengers
Huh Shades of Jim Hacker in "Yes Minister", and the saga of the hospital that was Britain's most efficient until it started admitting patients.
I think it's all three of arrogance, incompetence and mission creep, along with another factor you've hinted at in the rest of what I've quoted: thinking of "journey times" in terms of "vehicle times", regardless of whether the vehicle is a bus, tram, train, car or anything else, totally ignoring the fact that it's people making the journey, not a vehicle for its own vehicular sake.
Logged

Day return to Infinity, please.
Red Squirrel
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1431


Brexit simplified


View Profile
« Reply #110 on: July 17, 2017, 11:36:19 AM »

The pachyderm in the piano nobile here is that buses and trains have not had the highest priority in the redesign of the woeful Temple Circus Gyratory. The stated aims of the project are:

  • A more direct road layout and changes to access;
  • More space for people: high quality pedestrian and cycle routes;
  • Better public transport facilities and information;
  • Space for new buildings and public space.

That 'Better public transport facilities' should be third on the list is astonishing given the proximity of the scheme to the most important public transport hub in the city. And a cynic might think that 'space for new buildings and public space', an easily-sold revenue-raising element, may actually have held more sway that its position on the list suggests.

Logged

To all who believe in it, I propose a simple experiment. Buy a cake, eat it, and see if it is still there on the plate.
Four Track, Now!
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3010


I know nothing. Really.


View Profile Email
« Reply #111 on: July 17, 2017, 06:52:40 PM »

No-one with luggage or with restricted walking ability will find such a distance to the railway station encouraging the use of the new bus.  I hope they're not going to stop the other buses going up the ramp.


Taxis will be going to the new entrance - I'm not sure about buses. At present, the approach has stops for the 8/9, 70/72/73, hospital free bus, and the only one that doesn't terminate there, the airport bus A1. That last is particularly significant, as it is designed to link the railway station with another major transport hub - the airport. It will use the AVTM route for some of its services, but does not shrink from the challenge of crossing the southern carriageway on its inbound journey!

And a cynic might think that 'space for new buildings and public space', an easily-sold revenue-raising element, may actually have held more sway that its position on the list suggests.

You can see, by reference to history, what may happen in years to come. A future government realises that trams aren't such a bad idea after all, and encourages their use to link major railway stations to areas of employment and housing. Cities and major towns across the land rejoice and start building. Bristol says "If only we hadn't built New Broadmead on Plot 6, there would have been room for trams, and we wouldn't have all these dingy charity shops and nail salons to keep clear of tumbleweeds. It's a shame MetroBust didn't work out, but the executions were fun."
« Last Edit: July 17, 2017, 07:00:44 PM by Four Track, Now! » Logged

Now, please!
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants