Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:15 28 Mar 2024
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
* Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
* Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
14:49 Plymouth to Cardiff Central
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
Delayed
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
17:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 17:27:47 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[132] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[53] Return of the BRUTE?
[44] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 63
  Print  
Author Topic: MetroBus  (Read 236454 times)
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #165 on: October 19, 2017, 12:33:10 »

Metro without the bus?
http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/bristol-underground-one-step-closer-648615
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2257


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #166 on: October 19, 2017, 13:01:57 »


The caption on one of the pictures mentions a route from Bristol to Bath yet this is a route covered by rail already with a good 4 to 5 services an hour for much of the day. Duplicating rail routes 19th century railwaymania style and burying it in a field seems as insane as Metrobust (if that is possible).

The proposed Bristol to airport route is rather less barking but underground???

Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #167 on: October 19, 2017, 13:12:25 »

It's just padding in his "State of the City" speech. The redevelopment of the Cumberland Basin, though, fits in with his (Reese's) ideas.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #168 on: October 19, 2017, 13:54:59 »


The caption on one of the pictures mentions a route from Bristol to Bath yet this is a route covered by rail already with a good 4 to 5 services an hour for much of the day. Duplicating rail routes 19th century railwaymania style and burying it in a field seems as insane as Metrobust (if that is possible).

The proposed Bristol to airport route is rather less barking but underground???


But you wouldn't be duplicating the heavy rail route from Bristol to Bath, would you? An LRT route would have a lot more stops - not something the main line could easily be expanded accommodate - and would presumably better cover the populated areas. And I wouldn't get too hung up on the 'underground' label - surely it would only be in tunnels where that made sense.

It's just padding in his "State of the City" speech. The redevelopment of the Cumberland Basin, though, fits in with his (Reese's) ideas.

A very interesting idea. The Cumberland Basin flyover complex was designed to fit on the end of an urban motorway that was to run along Spike Island; we can all be grateful that this didn't happen. It now has redundant elements as well as some badly-engineered quasi-free-flow junctions. It is hard to justify the land-take. Marvin's plan may have legs... maybe he can get George to design the new scheme?
« Last Edit: October 19, 2017, 14:29:24 by Red Squirrel » Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2257


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #169 on: October 19, 2017, 14:45:33 »

True that LRT could have more stops but with options being looked at for reopening St Ann's & Saltford stations in addition to Keynshan and Oldfield Park already existing, there really are not many other worthwhile stop options that LRT could serve there. Better to spend the money on a route not currently served by anything.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #170 on: October 19, 2017, 14:57:30 »

The caption on one of the pictures mentions a route from Bristol to Bath yet this is a route covered by rail already with a good 4 to 5 services an hour for much of the day. Duplicating rail routes 19th century railwaymania style and burying it in a field seems as insane as Metrobust (if that is possible).

The proposed Bristol to airport route is rather less barking but underground???
During peak times the trains that do run between Bath and Bristol are packed, the roads the same. Lots more housing in the Keynsham/Bitton area. I think there is every case for a second line of some description between Bath and Bristol on the former line. Will it happen??? In this current financial climate no chance, just a dream like all the other schemes.

You can't fit many more trains on the current line hence the extra Bristol to London trains going via Parkway. I'd say there would have been more of a case for one of them to stop at Bath so it would have three trains an hour like Parkway but I don't think they can fit it in with current capacity near full when you factor in local stopping services.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #171 on: October 19, 2017, 15:00:45 »

..there really are not many other worthwhile stop options that LRT could serve...

I think there are!

How about a new route that followed the B&NS as far as Stockwood, then swung down through to the south-east of Keynsham (2km from the main line station), followed the main line for a bit (giving the possibility of an interchange) and thence tunnelled under Twerton and Englishcombe to approach Bath station from the south? That would cover large residential areas, many of which are currently very poorly served by public transport.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2257


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #172 on: October 19, 2017, 15:45:17 »

..there really are not many other worthwhile stop options that LRT could serve...

I think there are!

How about a new route that followed the B&NS as far as Stockwood, then swung down through to the south-east of Keynsham (2km from the main line station), followed the main line for a bit (giving the possibility of an interchange) and thence tunnelled under Twerton and Englishcombe to approach Bath station from the south? That would cover large residential areas, many of which are currently very poorly served by public transport.

An interesting suggestion and one that should see an expansion of it's catchment area for the foreseeable. My main concern still remains though as to whether there or not there are potential routes in and around Bristol that are more needed. The old midland line running parallel to the cyclepath as an LRT always sounded like good sense linking southeast and east Bristol with the city centre area. The trackbed is largely there and the cost of sorting out pinch points/obstructions would be rather less than even a short bit of tunneling.

Edit: Or was that part of the route (B&NS) you were suggesting? Apologies if I was actually just saying what you already largely said.
« Last Edit: October 19, 2017, 16:34:23 by johnneyw » Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #173 on: October 19, 2017, 17:46:49 »

I'm sure you are right that other routes would probably take priority.

If you look at the Avon Metro proposal, you can see that it is based on old or existing heavy rail routes with a few (but expensive) additions - an inverted U-shaped line running from Temple Meads up to Broadmead and The Centre, looping back to Temple Meads via Parson St (some or all of which may have been intended to go underground), a (perhaps surprising) link from Broadmead to Clifton Down, and a line from Parson St to Hartcliffe. Ignoring the Hartcliffe line (whose business case is weakened by MetroBus), it is possible to imagine that the Marvin Underground could consist of nothing more or less than the central loop. But that would be one hell of a thing, if it was fully integrated with MetroWest!

The B&NS route (not in the ATA proposal) runs south from Temple Meads to Brislington, and passes over this viaduct on its way to Radstock and Frome. It doesn't connect with the Midland.


Photo by Finn the Dog
« Last Edit: October 20, 2017, 08:48:38 by Red Squirrel » Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2257


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #174 on: October 19, 2017, 18:25:38 »

Thanks RS. Really fascinating Evening Post article you added there. Makes me think 'what if'? Cannot believe how long ago that was but recall thinking at the time that this was a bit ambitious for Bristol. I also remember questioning if we would ever really justify it's expense although now it would seem money well spent. Pity it hit the rocks along with many other good idea shipwrecks.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #175 on: October 19, 2017, 19:24:39 »

Re-reading the Modern Railways article, I'd missed the fact that the central loop used on-street running with the odd flyover. Also interesting that the Portishead line was to terminate at Wapping Wharf - why, one wonders..?
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2257


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #176 on: October 19, 2017, 19:55:48 »

Yes, it was not a Post article was it. As for the Wapping Wharf termination I can only guess at the reasons but could it be that the Metro was seen as a rather separate entity from what was then BR (British Rail(ways)) and this line's termination at Wapping Wharf reflected that?
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #177 on: October 20, 2017, 10:56:14 »

It's just padding in his "State of the City" speech. The redevelopment of the Cumberland Basin, though, fits in with his (Reese's) ideas.

A very interesting idea. The Cumberland Basin flyover complex was designed to fit on the end of an urban motorway that was to run along Spike Island; we can all be grateful that this didn't happen. It now has redundant elements as well as some badly-engineered quasi-free-flow junctions. It is hard to justify the land-take. Marvin's plan may have legs... maybe he can get George to design the new scheme?
Grin Actually, this would probably be something they would agree on, I reckon.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #178 on: October 20, 2017, 12:53:06 »

I found this map of the proposed Bristol Outer Circuit Road, on the very wonderful SABRE website:



Takes a moment to get your bearings, even if you know Bristol well!

Starting at 1 o'clock, the M32 junction looks familiar - but hang on, there's a flyover! The section of the Outer Circuit Road from Lawrence Hill to St Paul's was all going to be elevated. This explains why Lawrence Hill and St Paul's junctions are so massive.

At 4 o'clock, there's a junction for Feeder Road - when the Spine Road was built, following more or less the same alignment, this was omitted.

Next, at 5 o'clock is the vast sprawl of the Three Lamps interchange. I watched from the No.3 bus as day by day they ripped apart and burnt the quirky maze of hills and backstreets that was Totterdown for this junction. It was over 40 years ago, and it still makes me weep to think of it.

The odd twiddly bit at 7 o'clock is where the current St John's Lane, having been extended across Victoria Park, hits Bedminster Parade (quite close to Asda).

And then (get to the point, I hear a strangled cry!) we get to Spike Island. At its core, there's an elevated road heading west which hits a large multilevel interchange right where the SS Great Britain is now. Heading north from this is a link to Jacob's Wells Rd, but continuing west is a major road that connects to Cumberland Basin at Brunel Way. This explains the odd knot of link roads by Brunel Lock Road; somewhat oversized given that they only really access a few dozen houses and a pub.

Oh, and note the grey bits - Jacob's Wells Rd, Tyndall's Park Road, Cotham Brow, Montpelier... I've seen plans of the multilevel interchange at Queens Rd, but I've never quite understood how the road was going to cross Cheltenham Rd.

It was this scheme that formed my view that the private motor car is inappropriate as a means of transport in cities, ladies and gentlemen. Compared to this, MetroBus is a thing of beauty.

« Last Edit: October 20, 2017, 13:07:38 by Red Squirrel » Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #179 on: October 20, 2017, 13:36:37 »

The contrast between the inner ring road plans and MetroBus, as well as the newly announced housing plan on Spike Island, show how priorities have changed over the decades. And budgets.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 63
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page