Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:15 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:21 Newbury to Bedwyn
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 13:20:07 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[153] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[97] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[41] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[38] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[37] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
  Print  
Author Topic: Simon Brown, rail enthusiast, died on Gatwick Express train, 7 Aug 2016  (Read 25998 times)
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: August 31, 2016, 20:46:12 »

It is entirely possible that there has been a track slew or change of cant since the original structure installation; which might even been compounded several time over the 30 years.  Over the last 20 years there has been a lot of pressure to hand back track in time with no over runs so it is feasible the first thing to be skipped would be a full gauging check
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: September 01, 2016, 01:07:35 »

Hang on a minute though......that signal gantry leg is seriously foul of the structure gauge.  I do not condone people hanging their heads out of train windows but that is why the standard structure gauge is what it is.

Nevertheless to quote the RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) report "There is a notice above the window “Do not lean out of window when train is moving”", so I suspect the rail industry has covered it's arse with that. Same as no trespassing signs or level crossing signals not stopping people getting mown down by trains, with the rail industry rarely held accountable for such fatalities - I don't think they should carry any blame here either. This guy knew the score better than most, so should've taken a bit more responsibility for his own safety. Basic common sense failure of you ask me.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #32 on: September 01, 2016, 08:59:44 »

I'm reminded reading back about this incident that things are not always what they initially seem.  Two historic issues (the motorway pileup at Taunton and a level crossing incident at Moreton-on-Lugg) started off looking as if they were the almost exclusive fault of the deceased, but turned out to be quite otherwise.   In this current case, the initial RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) statement indicates a surprise factor ... my goodness - 10 inches is a smaller clearance that I would have guessed). The balance of what mistakes were made is far from clear, and we on the forum posting in public should be mindful of this, and mindful too that the friends and family of Simon Brown may read what we write.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: September 01, 2016, 14:49:23 »


So a savvy enthusiast could expect 28" clearance when in fact it was 10.25".

Because of which we shall have every droplight in the country nailed up.

Sub Judice - No Comment

OTC
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3457

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #34 on: September 01, 2016, 15:59:42 »

And then when they are nailed up we will all be imprisoned on HSTs (High Speed Train)
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #35 on: September 01, 2016, 18:03:04 »

And then when they are nailed up we will all be imprisoned on HSTs (High Speed Train)

Oh come now - I can remember a very long time ago the Ffestiniog locking people in their carriages from outside, and then letting them out at destination by walking along and unlocking. Can't say I felt comfortable with it.  So there is a precedent!

Now that HSTs have central door locking, is there any reason that internal handles can't be fitted?   Even without central door locking southern suburban units like the 4EPBs had internal handles ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: September 01, 2016, 20:44:12 »

The Railway Group Standard I quoted before, GC» (Great Central Railway - link to heritage line)/RT5212, was recently withdrawn. There is a complete new set of standards on gauging, as well as two new passenger gauges (PG1 and PG2). Their introduction is covered in RSSB (Rail Safety and Standards Board) Briefing note 15 BN21:
Quote
3 Compliance requirements

GE/RT8073, GE/RT8273, GI/RT7073 and GM/RT2173 come into force and are to be complied with from 05 March 2016 except for the lower sector gauge requirements set out in GM/RT2173 Clause 2.2.4.2 which have a delayed compliance date of 04 December 2021 to align with the LOC & PAS TSI.

After the compliance dates, or the date by which compliance is achieved if earlier, compliance with the requirements set out in GE/RT8073, GE/RT8273, GI/RT7073 and GM/RT2173 are to be maintained. Where it is considered not reasonably practicable to comply with the requirements, permission to comply with a specified alternative should be sought in accordance with the Railway Group Standards Code.

There are no exceptions to the general compliance date specified.

However, the bit I quoted is still there in the replacement, GI/RT7073:
Quote
2.2.3 Additional clearances at vehicle window level for new infrastructure
2.2.3.1 The following clearances shall be provided at the level of opening vehicle windows between 2000 mm and 3000 mm above the plane of the rails:
a) 450 mm where passenger vehicles operate with opening windows allowing passengers to lean out.
b) 250 mm where vehicles operate with opening windows for the use of train crew.

GE/GN8573 "Guidance on Gauging and Platform Stepping Distances" is not new, but has been revised and now says:
Quote
G 4.3.7   GI/RT7073 sets out a requirement for additional clearances at window level for new  infrastructure. This requirement is maintained to recognise that there is still a significant number of different types of rolling stock operating with opening windows allowing passengers to lean out, but also opening windows in cabs are provided for train crew to look out of the train. Rolling stock with opening windows allowing passengers to lean out include Mk 3 coaches and heritage coaches, typically Mk 2 and Mk 1 coaches. The majority, if not all, of cabs have opening windows for train crew use.
Of course that also applies to clearances to be maintained in existing infrastructure.
Logged
trainer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1035


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: September 01, 2016, 20:49:23 »

I can remember a very long time ago the Ffestiniog locking people in their carriages from outside, and then letting them out at destination by walking along and unlocking.

They still do on their older carriages where there are outward swinging doors, precisely because of the lack of clearance in many places.  It is truly narrow gauge and not just the distance between the rails.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: September 01, 2016, 20:51:42 »

There was another point in that earlier post, a quote from GC» (Great Central Railway - link to heritage line)/RT2456, and that in full says:
Quote
C3.9
Passenger door windows that are capable of being opened (drop lights) shall be locked and the passenger door shall be fitted with an interior door handle that is interlocked with the primary door lock such that it is prevented from being released other than when passengers are intended to board or alight the vehicle. Such passenger door windows shall be fitted with a manually operated  mechanism that will permit train crew only to open the drop light

That section was introduced in issue 2 in 2002, with this implementation requirement:
Quote
Compliance with paragraph C3.9 is required by 31 December 2005 for all applicable vehicles that are intended to remain in passenger use after 31 December 2007.

All of the requirements of this document are within the scope of Vehicle Acceptance Body approval. 

After the compliance date, or after the date by which compliance is achieved (if earlier), Railway Group members shall not deviate from the requirements set out  in this document. 

Where it is considered not practicable, or not reasonably practicable, to comply  with the requirements set out in this document; authorisation not to comply shall  be sought in accordance with  GA (Greater Anglia)/RT6001, GA/RT6004 or GA/RT6006.

Did that happen? Even for these Class 442s and HSTs (High Speed Train)?

If it had, this would be a staff-only window and a 10" clearance is then appropriate. Even is some people provide themselves with a railway key to open one, they are then clearly doing something that defeats the railways' efforts to protect them (and is probably against the by-laws).

GC/RT2456 was a mandatory standard, but it too has now been withdrawn. According to the briefing note (10 BN38) its requirements are now in GM/RT2100, but I can't find this one there - or anywhere else.

No doubt the RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) will enlighten us in due course.
Logged
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2007



View Profile
« Reply #39 on: September 01, 2016, 21:26:26 »

Going off at a slight tangent, but all this talk of loading gauges and locking doors reminds me of a trip I made a couple of years ago on the eastbound California Zephyr from Grand Junction CO to Denver CO.

Those of you who know your railway geography will know that the route of the Zephyr takes you through the Moffat Tunnel at the continental divide in the Colorado Rockies. As we approached the tunnel, there was an announcement over the PA (Public Address) requesting that we close all windows, vacate the door vestibules and return to our seats. Apparently the tunnel clearance is such that you could stand upright just inside the door, hold your arm outstetched and rest the palm of your hand against the tunnel wall and the length of the tunnel combined with the clearance and lack of ventilation shafts would not be pleasant on the lungs.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: May 25, 2017, 18:30:39 »

From the Rail Accident Investigation Branch reports:
Quote
Fatal accident involving a train passenger near Balham, on 7 August 2016.

At about 17:24 hrs on Sunday 7 August 2016 a passenger, travelling on a Gatwick Express service from Gatwick Airport to London Victoria, suffered fatal injuries as a result of having his head out of a window and striking it on a signal gantry near Balham in south London. The train was travelling at about 61 mph (98 km/h) at the time of the accident.

The window concerned was on a door opposite a guard’s compartment in the train; this door was accessible to passengers but it was not intended for passenger use. The RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) has found no evidence to explain why the passenger put his head out of the window at that time.

The accident occurred because the passenger’s head was out of the window, there was nothing to prevent passengers from opening the window or putting their head out of the opened window, and because there was less than the normal standard clearance between the train and the signal gantry. Although the clearance was compliant with standards for existing structures, it was less than an industry recommended minimum for new structures where there are trains with opening passenger windows.

An underlying cause was that the process for assessing the compatibility of this train on this route did not identify the risk of the combination of reduced structure clearances and opening windows.

The RAIB has made two recommendations and identified one learning point. One recommendation is addressed to Network Rail, and seeks to improve the industry’s management of the interacting risks between infrastructure and rolling stock. The second recommendation is addressed to relevant train operators with the intention of reducing the risk from people leaning out of opening train windows.

The learning point reinforces the need for regular monitoring and management of structure clearances when those clearances are reduced from normal.

R092017_170525_Balham

There is, in this case, quite a lot more to it than was apparent at the time.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: May 25, 2017, 20:50:52 »

There's an interesting observation in the report related to the number and relative sizes of the warning notices on the window in question. Looking at the window of an HST (High Speed Train) droplight this evening I noted that:-

1. the warning not to look out of the window is by far the smallest
2. several times bigger is the notice to close the window to save energy - not safety related
3. there's a large notice telling people to check that the door is adjacent to a platform before trying to open it, and not to lean on the door

The relative sizes of 1 and 2 appear wrong. As for 3, the only time when this could now be a safety issue is if the TM(resolve) has incorrectly opened using SDO (Selective Door Opening) (unless the driver has overshot slightly).  So again, the need for the notice and its relative size since SDO was introduced (over 10 years ago) seems doubtful.

 
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3457

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #42 on: May 25, 2017, 21:52:47 »

Quote
The RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) has found no evidence to explain why the passenger put his head out of the window at that time.

Because unfortunately that's what the enthusiasts seem to do. Just look for the so-called veg-ex going along dawlish on Saturday and I could put a safe bet most of the sea side has people with heads out the window.
I took a Saturday HST (High Speed Train) to Newquay last year and a chap got struck by a branch in the face. Fortunately no more than a lesson learnt.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5191


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: May 25, 2017, 22:14:32 »

Reading this thread, I note that some people have set out to blame the victim. That's not how we improve safety.

Psychologist Steven Pinker quotes a warning message that used to appear on portable generators and space heaters sold in the USA:

Quote
Mild exposure to CO can result in accumulated damage over time. Extreme exposure to CO may rapidly be fatal without producing significant warning symptoms.

According to Pinker, several hundred Americans every year turned their homes into gas chambers after failing to appreciate the meaning of this. The warning was then changed to:

Quote
Using a generator indoors CAN KILL YOU IN MINUTES

This has proved more effective.

Perhaps it would be better if the warning sign by an openable window said something more like:

Quote
If you lean out of this window you may strike lineside equipment which could kill you. Equipment may be much closer than you think.


Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #44 on: May 25, 2017, 22:53:21 »

Unfortunately, no notice will deter those that think they know better
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page