Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:15 19 Apr 2024
- Mystery over woman's lying in road crash death
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningShort Run
13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:31 Barnstaple to Axminster
Delayed
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2024, 14:30:26 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[226] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[107] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[46] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
[43] Signage - not making it easy ...
[9] IETs at Melksham
[8] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Video of class 707 units  (Read 10954 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40784



View Profile WWW Email
« on: August 15, 2016, 17:28:43 »

On The Londonist

New units for Waterloo to Windsor and Weybridge via Staines services
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2016, 17:49:05 »

Thanks for that Grahame.  Spotted something quite interesting at 2mins 50seconds Shocked
Logged
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1501


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 15, 2016, 17:56:31 »

I was looking for a nameboard 'Melksham' but didn't see it ! Huh
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 15, 2016, 17:58:09 »

I was looking for a nameboard 'Melksham' but didn't see it ! Huh

 Grin Cheesy Well you didn't really expect me to be looking at the train did you......

I think it might be a ramped, removable, track crossing.
« Last Edit: August 15, 2016, 18:13:58 by SandTEngineer » Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 15, 2016, 21:24:38 »

Quote from: The Londonist
heatmaps indicating which carriages are busiest
But no UEGs (Unit End Gangway) Angry. Admittedly they only seem to have 5 coaches on the heatmap, so it might not be suggesting passengers try to walk to somewhere they can't get to, but then the presenter/narator said "you're now able to walk down the length of the train without using interconnecting doors". Err, no you can't, not when the train is a 10-car formation anyway. The lack of UEGs is not a problem on the Thameslink stock because the shortest units in that fleet are 8-car, which is too long for anybody to try running a pair in multiple in service, but as far as I know SWT (South West Trains) plan to use the 707s in multiple. SWT's 'new' 458/5s have UEGs (the 458s didn't used to) so I can't understand why the 707s don't.

UEGs = Unit End Gangways
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7163


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 15, 2016, 23:42:50 »

...SWT (South West Trains)'s 'new' 458/5s have UEGs (Unit End Gangway) (the 458s didn't used to) ...

Oh yes they did - but not in the sense you imply.

I've always thought that, in both old and new 458s (and the 450s we have now), the gangway is inside the conductor's lair and not accessible to passengers. Admittedly I've never tried barging through, so I can't be sure that so nor whether it's a limitation of the design (e.g. a lack of doors to close off the driving positions). For trains that stop every five minutes it's not hard to move between units anyway, and in an emergency access for staff and (by invitation) passengers is still available.

On the issue of "heat maps" (which might be a bad choice of name if 707s have dodgy chillers), do you need them if you can see into the next carriage? That should ensure that any standing passengers can diffuse into areas of lower density. It would be more useful to know about the loading of the other unit of a pair, whether getting to it means using the platform or not.

Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: August 16, 2016, 08:03:56 »

I have been told that they don't have loos (shades of Crossrail)

I would have thought Windsor to Waterloo is too long not to have loos.

Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7794



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 16, 2016, 10:09:14 »

I have been told that they don't have loos (shades of Crossrail)

I would have thought Windsor to Waterloo is too long not to have loos.




.............it'll certainly be a challenge on the way home from Twickenham!  Shocked
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7163


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 16, 2016, 10:21:25 »

I have been told that they don't have loos (shades of Crossrail)

I would have thought Windsor to Waterloo is too long not to have loos.
.............it'll certainly be a challenge on the way home from Twickenham!  Shocked

That's 30 minutes on the train. The same as Richmond to Victoria on the District Line. So not at all out of line with the Underground - typically 40 minutes (or a bit more) out from the centre to the end of the line.

Now that might indeed be an issue for some of us men of a certain age, but it's not a problem specific to trains!
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7794



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 16, 2016, 10:28:43 »

I have been told that they don't have loos (shades of Crossrail)

I would have thought Windsor to Waterloo is too long not to have loos.
.............it'll certainly be a challenge on the way home from Twickenham!  Shocked

That's 30 minutes on the train. The same as Richmond to Victoria on the District Line. So not at all out of line with the Underground - typically 40 minutes (or a bit more) out from the centre to the end of the line.

Now that might indeed be an issue for some of us men of a certain age, but it's not a problem specific to trains!


Age + pre and post match ale also comes into the equation!
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: August 16, 2016, 11:25:18 »

The end gangways on 458/0 were never cleared for passenger use, they only eventually brought them into use so that the guard could move between units, and he operated the doors from a centre cab only.   I believe the floor was not considered level enough.   It was also only connected or disconnected in the depot, they weren't available to help with splitting and joining in service.

On the mainline side, the 450 (and 444) gangways have always been available to passengers for normal use.    There is no logical reason that I can think of why 450s in use on the Reading line do not allow normal use, even if the guard wishes to dispatch from a cab, this was done on the mainline side when SDO (Selective Door Opening) was 'per unit' and had to be operated from the leading cab of the back unit, but the gangway remained open to passengers.

Paul
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 28, 2017, 14:00:03 »

They've been used to and from Reading this week (not in service), presumably to test out the equipment for the imminent extension from 8-car to 10-car services on the route?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7163


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 28, 2017, 14:39:28 »

They've been used to and from Reading this week (not in service), presumably to test out the equipment for the imminent extension from 8-car to 10-car services on the route?

Indeed, I've seen a couple on 10-cars now - not the same units, so it does look like shake-down as they all arrive. They are due to start work in April, running to Windsor and Weybridge, but I guess Staines to Reading is a bit less busy than a similar distance further in.

Confusingly, the one that was stopped at Wokingham was ferrying a couple of people labelled as from Concept Security who were (unsurprisingly) interested in the TV cameras.

And as of two weeks ago, Wokingham Platform 1 extension to 12-car length was opened. If the 5-car 458s are to come "home" to Reading, all their stops need to have long enough platforms by April.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 28, 2017, 16:11:08 »

And as of two weeks ago, Wokingham Platform 1 extension to 12-car length was opened. If the 5-car 458s are to come "home" to Reading, all their stops need to have long enough platforms by April.
They won't all be 10 car platforms, AIUI (as I understand it) from the latest enhancements milestones there's a limited number that will remain under the control of ASDO (Automatic Selective Door Operation).

Paul   
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7163


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 28, 2017, 16:37:12 »

And as of two weeks ago, Wokingham Platform 1 extension to 12-car length was opened. If the 5-car 458s are to come "home" to Reading, all their stops need to have long enough platforms by April.
They won't all be 10 car platforms, AIUI (as I understand it) from the latest enhancements milestones there's a limited number that will remain under the control of ASDO (Automatic Selective Door Operation).
Paul   

Yes, there are a few. I should have said all the extensions underway should be finished - I don't suppose SWT (South West Trains) want to be setting up temporary SDO (Selective Door Opening) at extra places for a few weeks.

Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page