Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:35 29 Mar 2024
- Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 13:50:41 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[153] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[97] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[41] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[38] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[37] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
  Print  
Author Topic: Disabled customer "humiliated by GWR staff"  (Read 34824 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #45 on: September 29, 2016, 06:03:07 »

access from platforms to trains is somewhat harder – presumably something could be achieved by standardising the heights and platform to door gaps of all rolling stock and platforms, maybe enough to get most wheelchair and stick users across a much reduced gap, but would probably require rebuilding almost every platform and redesigning almost every carriage. So no.

Again, something that London Underground have succeeded with, in terms of coming up with a cheap and cheerful alternative to the complete rebuilding of platforms - standardised rolling stock on each line or group of lines of course, but they have addressed the issue of platform to rolling stock height by installing a simple raised, ramped platform edge which coincides with the section of the train where wheelchairs can fit. Very simple and effective design solution.

That ramp's on National Rail too - the "Harrington Hump" - and indeed it was specifically raised an an inclusivity / access day I attended on Tuesday.   I'm familiar with the on the Cambrian Coast; also at Exeter St Thomas
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 711


View Profile
« Reply #46 on: September 29, 2016, 09:36:29 »

Problem solved as soon as Crossrail takes over the station

The issue occurred at Paddington rather than Maidenhead. Are crossrail/tfl taking over Paddington?
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #47 on: September 29, 2016, 09:46:04 »

The platforms for Crossrail - yes,  I think so.
Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #48 on: September 29, 2016, 09:48:15 »

access from platforms to trains is somewhat harder – presumably something could be achieved by standardising the heights and platform to door gaps of all rolling stock and platforms, maybe enough to get most wheelchair and stick users across a much reduced gap, but would probably require rebuilding almost every platform and redesigning almost every carriage. So no.

Again, something that London Underground have succeeded with, in terms of coming up with a cheap and cheerful alternative to the complete rebuilding of platforms - standardised rolling stock on each line or group of lines of course, but they have addressed the issue of platform to rolling stock height by installing a simple raised, ramped platform edge which coincides with the section of the train where wheelchairs can fit. Very simple and effective design solution.

That ramp's on National Rail too - the "Harrington Hump" - and indeed it was specifically raised an an inclusivity / access day I attended on Tuesday.   I'm familiar with the on the Cambrian Coast; also at Exeter St Thomas

I didn't realise they had been employed on the 'big' network too, credit therefore also due to NR» (Network Rail - home page) & relevant TOC (Train Operating Company)'s!
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #49 on: September 29, 2016, 11:57:23 »

Ooh, I've not seen those – or not noticed them, anyway. Hopefully they work better on rails than at bus stops, where sometimes the bus stops with its door alongside the built-up part, and sometimes one or two bus lengths behind it (or even a bus width away from the kerb!)
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: September 29, 2016, 14:07:41 »

Ooh, I've not seen those – or not noticed them, anyway. Hopefully they work better on rails than at bus stops, where sometimes the bus stops with its door alongside the built-up part, and sometimes one or two bus lengths behind it (or even a bus width away from the kerb!)

I think they're mostly on the Victoria line, though I am sure I have seen them on other parts of the network.

LUL (London Underground Ltd) as you may know have made a fine art out of accurate stopping and their trains don't normally get turned around at all, so they work quite well. Main downside appears to be the lack of joined up routes between accessible stations, which is slowly improving, but a long long way to go for TfL» (Transport for London - about)!
Logged
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 711


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: September 29, 2016, 19:08:25 »

The platforms for Crossrail - yes,  I think so.

Ah ok, just so that I've got this straight, once crossrail starts running disabled people can use it but they still should avoid GWR (Great Western Railway) which is for able bodied people? 
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #52 on: September 29, 2016, 19:20:01 »

Don't put your words into my mouth!
Logged
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 711


View Profile
« Reply #53 on: September 29, 2016, 19:28:21 »

A tongue in cheek reply to a tongue in cheek reply.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #54 on: September 29, 2016, 23:44:53 »

Eh? My reply to your question certainly wasn't tongue-in-cheek
Logged
brizzlechris
Full Member
***
Posts: 57


View Profile
« Reply #55 on: September 30, 2016, 10:14:34 »

More from Sophie Christiansen on Twitter today...

Quote
Just chilling, waiting for a man with a ramp... It's not like I have work to get to or anything... #WheresTheApp @GWRHelp

https://twitter.com/SChristiansen87/status/781749471684259840

Quote
That's 2/2 journeys this week PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) haven't known about. Wouldn't an app make it easier for your staff? #NotGoodEnough #WheresTheApp

https://twitter.com/SChristiansen87/status/781754824882814976

Quote
@SChristiansen87 We have a system in place and staff will be aware of any booked assistance & happy to provide unbooked assistance too. -A

https://twitter.com/GWRHelp/status/781755237019287552

Quote
Clearly it needs looking at then with a 0% success rate this week. You'd get so many more travellers, with confidence in service @GWRHelp

https://twitter.com/SChristiansen87/status/781756232684142592
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #56 on: September 30, 2016, 10:27:37 »

Ooh, I've not seen those – or not noticed them, anyway. Hopefully they work better on rails than at bus stops, where sometimes the bus stops with its door alongside the built-up part, and sometimes one or two bus lengths behind it (or even a bus width away from the kerb!)

I think they're mostly on the Victoria line, though I am sure I have seen them on other parts of the network.

LUL (London Underground Ltd) as you may know have made a fine art out of accurate stopping and their trains don't normally get turned around at all, so they work quite well. Main downside appears to be the lack of joined up routes between accessible stations, which is slowly improving, but a long long way to go for TfL» (Transport for London - about)!
Just coming back to these "humps", if I understand it correctly they allow a wheelchair user to simply wheel themself from the platform into the carriage without any ramp etc being needed. Is that right?
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #57 on: September 30, 2016, 11:38:37 »

Siphie Christiensen has to realise that there are still limitations & processes that she needs to follow. Not doing so & letting rip won't be getting her very far.

Yes. Of course it would be nice to turn up & go @ every station. Realistically, its far better now than a decade ago & is still improving but rverything costs money inc extra staff.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #58 on: September 30, 2016, 11:59:30 »

Siphie Christiensen has to realise that there are still limitations & processes that she needs to follow. Not doing so & letting rip won't be getting her very far.

It's Sophie Christiansen.  I'm not surprised she was 'letting rip' - I expect she was extremely frustrated to be let down twice in one week!  I think it's excellent that someone with a high profile is able to highlight problems with the system, as I've said before the majority of assistance requests go very smoothly, but where there are problems they need to be highlighted. 

She points out the possibility of developing an app (and offered to help develop it IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly)) which would be an excellent thing for ATOC» (Association of Train Operating Companies See - here) to develop - a national app rather than each TOC (Train Operating Company) having their own.  Imagine being able to book your assistance in advance easily and quickly on one of those rather than having to make time consuming phone calls.  That way, a person needing assistance could submit their entire journey via an app, rather than the cumbersome current arrangements where, as I understand it, you have to contact each operator with your requirements, some (like GWR (Great Western Railway)) can be submitted online, but others (such as CrossCountry and Chiltern) require you to make a phone call.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #59 on: September 30, 2016, 12:27:34 »

So she approaches ATOC» (Association of Train Operating Companies See - here), even by twitter, rather than simply shouting generally from the rooftops? There are better ways about it, surely?
I don't think asking one TOC (Train Operating Company) to develop their own is sensible, and you seem to agree, suggesting ATOC. Otherwise each TOC nay/may not develop their own, and an integrated solution is whats needed.

There must be suitable charities that would help her approach the right organisation?

There's nothing from Sophie that suggests she booked assistance, nor on what route. If she travelled again from Burnham with friends assistance, of course that won't work.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page