Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:35 28 Mar 2024
- Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
13:26 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
15:10 Newquay to Par
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
17:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 15:43:47 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Cross Country direct award until October 2019  (Read 13680 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #15 on: October 09, 2016, 09:00:04 »

Richard Gibson of CrossCounty came down to Taunton (TravelWatch SouthWest) on Saturday (8th October) to tell us about the direct award.   Well - that's what was billed, but he started by telling us there really wasn't all that much to tell and gave us a general flavour of CrossCountry for much of his time.

My notes from that first section:

Quote
XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) . Preface "why a bit different"
91 trains.
30 million to 37 millions journeys per annum
HST (High Speed Train) have added seats
Others frachises have London income, have stations and ticket offices
Cover every Network Rail route not just a few
No one flow worth more than 1%
15% communiting 38% business 57% leisure
Average journey 60 miles / 60 minutes
Big flows
BMH -> PLY» (Plymouth - next trains) 295th in flows
Demand - 1. BHM 6. BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains) 24. Exeter 36. Ply
118 stations served
Biggest competitor is motorway
86% satisfied
One of busiest trains - 16:44 BRI to TAU» (Taunton - next trains). 5 car voyager. 31 mins; GW (Great Western) behind takes 68.
Busy for just tiny part of the run; hard to extend for just the one part.
Infrastructure limits too. Could run sprinter for lots of runs.
Loosing time at stations. Constrants of new stations being added.
Infrastructure work at CP6 (Control Period 6 - The five year period between 2019 and 2024) to make improvements?

He then moved on to speak about the new franchise

Quote
New franchise to autumn 2019
Investing £40 million
£160m to government
* Free WiFi (not capacity at present - so charges remain to supress demand)
* Dedicated point of contact for customers all day, every day through multiple channels
(Many tickets sold soon after opening at T12 in the early hours)
* Greater range of advacned fares / removal of £10 admin charge for change
* 38k seats "58th Voyager".
Taking on 2 power cars and cutting 2 5 car voyagers and making a 4 car. EDB -> PLY
* Better timetables and connections from 12.17; consultation seoon.   Current is from 2006/2007 barely changed
* 340k community rail per annum to locally based community rail. Not known how it works yet.
* 1000 mamber "passenger panel" - passengers and stakeholder.  Get more views on board.

"tough quality and delivery targets
"suite of measures to rduce fuel
"future proof HST to run beyond 2020

Then  a handful of questions

Quote
QNS - Ivybridge.  Problem - only 4 car can stop not 5 car. Also Ashchurch.
QNS - Add 2 extra carriages at peak? Problem of adding a voyager?  "Timetableing is complicated".
QNS - replacement taxi and bus policy / disability. (from David Redgewell)
   Prefer people on trains to rail replacement. Added stops for tunnel engineer.
   We have a policy but "not sure if it's public"

Time was limited for questions; more wanted to ask than could be called. This was the final main presentation before lunch, but Richard had to dash off giving apologies "because my wife's away" and couldn't join us.



Comment

I get the feeling that Richard's talk was designed more to limit expectations and tell his audience why things couldn't be done rather than to herald any bright new future.  His flow figures telling us that no one "flow" was responsible for more than 1% of their business, and that Bristol's 6th and Plymouth 29th in the their passenger numbers, and his presentation of train loading graphs showing why the 16:44 from Bristol to Taunton couldn't be made less crowded because it wasn't overcrowded on the rest of its journey from Scotland to the West Country. 

Statistically I'm sure all his data was correct, but I question Richard's splitting up of flows - from what I could see - into individual station to station journeys.   That way he could give the message "you're really not that important to us" to (say) Bristol Temple Meads to Taunton passengers, and also to Bristol Parkway to Taunton passengers, to Bristol Temple Meads to Tiverton Passengers, to Bristol Parkway to Tiverton Passengers, to passengers from the Bristol areas to Exeter and from Cheltenham Spa to Taunton.

I appreciate the honesty of saying that the current WiFi in the trains couldn't cope with all the traffic that would come if it were free, but I question whether it should really take 2 years to beef up the WiFi hubs / boxes to the level required; is it just possible that leaving the accountants rather like the idea of leaving the income-generating system in place as long as possible?

The lack of answers on how community rail is to be supported, on how the passenger panel is to work, and the bringing of the commnications with 24 hour service where others have done these things already gave the impression of an operator being pulled along rather than jumping at th eopportunities offered - opportunities (for example) to promote further the quieter sections of their routes working with people in communities along the way ("we don't look after stations" is a poor staring point for engaining with non-users of rail near those stations).  And a need to dash off before the ability for us to ask any lunch time questions rather than paying the childminder for another hour (an educated guess) doesn't exactly shine in customer care terms.

Saying that "they have a whole new fleet of trains and we have one extra 2nd hand voyager" may be true in some of the comparisons with East Anglia.  And I can understand a jealously.  But I'll also point out the rather good work done on other parts of the network using cascaded rolling stock built in the last century, rather than this century's stock such as the Class 220/221.   Richard was notably short on comment on the utilisation of the HSTs, and wasn't around at lunch to ask.

If the franchise is so wide that passenger groups in individual areas feel they're of little or no interest to the operator, might it be sensible to divide the franchise into operating divisions or if that's already done to pass more of the stratgy and customer relations to those divisions?  Could there be some sense in splitting the franchise so that long distance service route groups are relocated into other franchises - taking (in each case) a franchise somewhere along the way and giving it tentacles out to new markets?   I'm noting that GWR (Great Western Railway) run to Brighton ... how about Virgin West Coast to Bournmouth, GWR to Manchester, East Midlands Trains to Cardiff and East Coast to Plymouth and Penzance?   With this current franchise being a do-little, direct award, perhaps we'll see something that's far better in terms of progress for the customer in 2019?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: October 09, 2016, 09:29:01 »

Thanks for that, Graham.  As I previously said, XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) are the 'just do enough' franchise IMHO (in my humble opinion).  Hopefully they'll be a little more to cheer about in 2019 when a proper franchise is let and a proper set of improvements will be specified by the DfT.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: October 09, 2016, 11:28:46 »

Thanks for that, Graham.  As I previously said, XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) are the 'just do enough' franchise IMHO (in my humble opinion).  Hopefully they'll be a little more to cheer about in 2019 when a proper franchise is let and a proper set of improvements will be specified by the DfT.
Calling it a 'just do enough' franchise sums XC up nicely. But then again, Cross Country was the Cinderella of the IC (Inter City) network too because of its non-London based network. It improved somewhat when the cascade of HSTs (High Speed Train) took place following the electrification of the East Coast line. It's best days of investment were the brand new fleet of Voyagers introduced under the franchise held by Virgin. Shame they were totally inappropriate for the lines they now serve though  Roll Eyes
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #18 on: October 09, 2016, 12:21:19 »

Bear in mind that the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) specify the requirements...XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) simply respond by signing up. So its a 'just do enough' DfT....
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page