Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 06:15 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
06:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
06:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
07:00 Bedwyn to Newbury
07:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
07:49 Bedwyn to Newbury
08:13 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:23 Hereford to London Paddington
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 Bedwyn to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 06:24:59 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[82] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[76] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[74] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[67] Return of the BRUTE?
[57] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: GWR Electrics - just 4 services a day!!!!!  (Read 3575 times)
CJB666
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 210


View Profile
« on: October 16, 2016, 21:10:32 »

Saw a poster recently extolling the advantages of the new GWR (Great Western Railway) electrics between Hayes & Harlington and Paddington. And I saw one of these trains at Hayes on Friday evening - it was largely empty.

The poster proudly proclaimed that the overcrowding between Hayes and London will now be eased with the introduction of this intensive new service. Er - intensive? Well with a mere four trains a day in each direction - that's two trains in the early morning, and two trains in the evening.

The empty train I saw came in on platform 3. After the pax. had detrained, it went west, crossed over to up relief and then the up loop out of the Airport, and waited, and waited, and waited, effectively blocking any Connect coming out of the Airport. Why didn't it use platform 5? And more to the point why aren't there more services than 4 a day?

Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2016, 21:13:25 »

I think you must of missed this thread: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=14927.msg165630#msg165630
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2016, 22:37:37 »

Yes, an all day service from January, additional peak services from Maidenhead from next May, and likely introduction of all-day service between London and Didcot from the end of next year.  Drivers are currently being trained to ensure there's enough that have signed them in time for January.

Platform 5 is not yet authorised for use by the 8-car Class 387s, but should be after work this Xmas is completed, so the all-day service will be using it.

The airport line is currently used to turn them around, but it doesn't effectively block the Connect trains which can quite easily get to the platform using another route.  The advantages of the very flexible layout that's being installed there.

Regarding the business of the trains, I bet it was far from largely empty when it left Paddington.  More and more people are choosing the new trains, which seem to be going down very well with commuters, taking a little pressure off of the previously bursting-at-the-seams Turbo services.  I watched the 17:18 depart Paddington a week or so ago and reckon it was about 75% full (with a few standees at the far end) - no doubt getting busier at Ealing Broadway, despite only leaving three minutes after the 17:15 Turbo.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 16, 2016, 22:42:06 »

Saw a poster recently extolling the advantages of the new GWR (Great Western Railway) electrics between Hayes & Harlington and Paddington. And I saw one of these trains at Hayes on Friday evening - it was largely empty.

The poster proudly proclaimed that the overcrowding between Hayes and London will now be eased with the introduction of this intensive new service. Er - intensive? Well with a mere four trains a day in each direction - that's two trains in the early morning, and two trains in the evening.

The empty train I saw came in on platform 3. After the pax. had detrained, it went west, crossed over to up relief and then the up loop out of the Airport, and waited, and waited, and waited, effectively blocking any Connect coming out of the Airport. Why didn't it use platform 5? And more to the point why aren't there more services than 4 a day?



Given it was terminating at Hayes, you'd hardly expect it to be full. It could have carried large numbers of passengers out of Paddington bound for the stops before Hayes.   You wouldn't have seen those.  Once the Greenford service is cut back to West Ealing all day from December the service will indeed run all day and will utilise the Greenford services' paths into Paddington.  Infrastructure changes being carried out over Xmas will remove the need for the rather convoluted reversal currently required, and I think will also enable Platform 5 to be used. Finally, and this is pure speculation, I'm presuming that the service was introduced before too many drivers had been trained on the units, but it was felt better to get a limited service up and running in peak hours, when the capacity is needed.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2016, 06:44:56 »

It seems sensible for the new electric services to build up as infrastructure becomes available - growing from seeds - and so the initial shoots may be tiny.  The alternative of waiting for the wires to be live all the way, and switching overnight from an intensive diesel service to an intensive electric service would be a recipe for potential disaster, with teething problems (if there were any) making what's been going on with Southern's service look trivial and genteel. I'm not saying that would happen - but there would be a significant risk of it.   The new Borders Railway had months of trial running of various sorts before it went live with a "big bang", but they had the luxury of no existing customer base to be conveyed during the trials, and the model doesn't work for a line that's already intensively used.

Thames Valley services are already intensive (I would LOVE to see even a sixth of the local train departure rate from Paddington on our line!) and will remain so, with higher capacity bedding in.    Growth takes time;  it's no accident that the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) looks at a three year period for trials before they become a part of a main franchise - so this is acknowledged even at the centre where you might expect harder hearts (I wish the bus operators and support systems would take note of this timing!).

I've done a lot of work looking at seat occupancy rates ... not sure what it is up the Thames Valley, but a remarkably low-sounding  figure like 25% is actually rather good.   Passengers feel that all trains are busy when they're not; there are far more people around to see the busy trains - so they're typically the ones to be reported, and observing a train at the 'other end' of its run - even in the peak - is very informative and thought provoking with regard to peak cost provision, and to looking and seeing where further marketing / promotion can usefully be done.  Our TransWilts campaign this summer / wary autumn has concentrated on getting that seat occupancy rate up on our line, and that's done by promoting those services and parts of services where seats remain in plentiful supply.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2016, 08:36:54 »

In an interesting comparison to the 17:15 and 17:18 trains referenced in my post above, there's also the 17:12 to Henley-On-Thames which is a 5-car Turbo and usually loads to about 75% full (i.e. 25% of seats empty), which is not too far off the ideal balance between a train that's too empty and one which is uncomfortably full.  It runs first stop Slough, then Burnham, Taplow, Maidenhead, and Twyford before heading onto the branch.  However, because it usually departs from Platform 14, I've noticed a couple of times that the front carriage only has a couple of dozen people on board and consequently plenty of room, whereas the back two carriages are full to capacity with people standing. 

The journey time to Slough is a quite slow 22 minutes on the relief lines, so that somewhat spoils the attraction of it to the Maidenhead contingent.  That compares with the 17:18 to Oxford which is always a packed solid 5-car Class 180 first stop Maidenhead.

In terms of the January Hayes to Paddington all day shuttle, GWR (Great Western Railway) proposes to run 6 morning Peak and 26 Off Peak trains from Hayes & Harlington to London Paddington and 6 evening Peak trains and 26 Off Peak trains from London Paddington to Hayes & Harlington.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2016, 10:40:49 »

It isn't just infrastructure readiness, they only received the last two of the initial eight unit batch last week.

What we are seeing is a perfectly normal phased introduction, changing all those relevant drivers from DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) to EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) takes time, it cannot be a big bang.

Might have been an idea for the OP (Original Poster / topic starter) to have had a browse of the forum for the existing threads first, rather than going straight into rant mode, although an initial rant and then disappearing for a few months is the usual routine...

Paul
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page