Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:15 28 Mar 2024
* Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 16:21:22 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Taking a look at the Rail Delivery Group statement and longer term strategy  (Read 12214 times)
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: February 07, 2017, 13:38:52 »

fair point, but would you need to take 2x9cars west of EXD» (Exeter St Davids - next trains)? Maybe a fast 9car plus a slow 5car?
Logged
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2007



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 07, 2017, 13:46:10 »

Having been sad enough to go to EXD» (Exeter St Davids - next trains) for the first run of the Class 800, I was surprised just how long the 9 car version was. Pulling right up to the southern extreme of platform 4, there was just about enough room for another two or maybe three coaches before it fouled the level crossing at the rear of the train, so I think you'd even be pushed to get a 9+5 train into EXD.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: February 07, 2017, 14:27:58 »

Yup - talking reality, I suspect we're looking at 2x5cars....
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: February 07, 2017, 17:43:38 »

In the near term I agree, but in the longer term some significantly longer trains are going to be needed to handle rising passenger numbers.

An obvious way to achieve this is the running of very much longer trains from platform 1 at Paddington to someplace well outside London where the train may be divided.

The merit of so doing is no extra path is taken up in the congested London area.

Just three such trains would move an extra couple of thousand passengers.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 589


View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: February 07, 2017, 18:37:29 »

It is surprising that all the upgrades to London mainline stations, and to Birmingham New Street appear to be improved current issues and not address longterm growth issues. A limit of 16 Intercity trains an hour from Paddington is to low.

Whilst I accept that Double Deck trains are slower at stations, we must start to think of radical solutions to our rail infrastructure issues.

One of the ways to address Paddington would be to great a 'Gateway' station at Old Oak Common (part of HS2 (The next High Speed line(s))) to allow the better handling handling of trains. As Paddington is not really the destination for most people, this would not be an issue and could address a lot of capacity issues. Trains could terminate/start at Old Oak Common, and visit Paddington before starting their main journey.

Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #20 on: February 07, 2017, 21:45:20 »

Whilst I accept that Double Deck trains are slower at stations, we must start to think of radical solutions to our rail infrastructure issues.

Capacity limits move from the running lines to the stations. At stations with significant passenger numbers off and on, perhaps alternate trains into alternate platforms?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: February 07, 2017, 21:57:35 »

One of the ways to address Paddington would be to great a 'Gateway' station at Old Oak Common (part of HS2 (The next High Speed line(s))) to allow the better handling handling of trains. As Paddington is not really the destination for most people, this would not be an issue and could address a lot of capacity issues. Trains could terminate/start at Old Oak Common, and visit Paddington before starting their main journey.
Most people's destination is beyond Paddington: in the City, the West End, Docklands or some other part of London, which they'll probably access by tube, bus or taxi. So this just shoves the problems onto the Tube. Paddington doesn't really have particularly good Tube connections IMO (in my opinion) – it has lots of lines but the access between mainline platforms and tunnels is not good – so possibly Old Oak Common could help if it has better Tube (and bus) connections. Although it seems to be the wrong side... Hopefully Crossrail should help.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #22 on: February 08, 2017, 06:49:54 »

Most people's destination is beyond Paddington: in the City, the West End, Docklands or some other part of London, which they'll probably access by tube, bus or taxi. So this just shoves the problems onto the Tube ...

Agreed - and that dilutes the "we must have Plymouth to London (Paddington?) in three hours" mantra somewhat. Quantitative comparators are indeed useful, but timing to a stop at a station platform that's an intermediate changing point on people's door to door journey and from where they have to walk considerably to their ongoing transport makes the comparator somewhat artificial.

The Crossrail interchange an Paddington - assuming a much better change from inbound expresses to the Betty line - should save several minutes, as would an interchange and new measuring "London" point at Old Oak.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #23 on: February 08, 2017, 09:52:12 »

Once OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) is built & up & running, I foresee more pax changing there for onward connections via Crossriail than at Paddington. OOC will be built to cope with this. All trains will call, I understand, adding at least 3 mins to journeys.

This at a point where the HEX contract expires. I can't see it continuing either, as pax will connect at OOC with Crossrail to Heathrow.
Logged
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 589


View Profile Email
« Reply #24 on: February 08, 2017, 10:39:48 »

It would be really useful if when OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) is rebuilt, it could allow ALL trains to terminate there, empty, clean and then start their journey and head to Paddington.

This would probably require a lot of platforms/bays at OOC to handle this, but if done properly the current restriction of 16 trains per hour could be lifted, for a lot less than adding another another
  • platforms at Paddington.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #25 on: February 08, 2017, 10:46:42 »

rebuilt?

I don't think the space is there for what you are suggesting, together with the infrastructure to clean (staff accommodation, waste disposal, etc), nor is there the ability to convert PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) into a station where services arrive, pick up & depart, rather than terminate & restart as now. The throat just doesn't have enough lines to achieve this. OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) is already being seen as a station where nothing can terminate....cf Chiltern's proposed services, which are being developed on a loop basis, with no reversals.
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: February 08, 2017, 11:29:16 »

Whilst I accept that Double Deck trains are slower at stations

Depends which stations.  At Paddington a double decker isn't slower because the train is already sat at the platform for more than just a minute or two.  They are only slower at intermediate stations and for trains with few intermediate stops that is not much of an issue.  The problem is that when you think about possible trains with few intermediate stops you come up with the idea of running Paddington to Taunton or similar and that is a hell of a lot of miles to lift the gauge (and the lovely new electrification) on.  Increasing the loading gauge is only likely to be affordable for relatively short heavily used routes and those routes will not be the ones you want to run a limited stop service on.

Double Deckers would of course be very suitable for the limited stop services on HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)).  Please let them build the infrastructure to allow that even if the initial batch of trains are single deckers.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: April 16, 2017, 17:51:43 »

At the moment we seem to be at somewhat of a stalemate regarding passenger capacity to the southwest.
"it is not worth building significantly longer trains, or extra multiple units to significantly lengthen existing trains, because most busy stations cant accept longer trains"

Followed by "it is not worth lengthening platforms significantly because we have not got/can not afford much longer trains to utilise these platforms"

I, and others have suggested use of the extended platform 1 at Paddington to provide significantly increased capacity by running much longer trains, rather than by more trains.

An alternative might be to run some services from London Waterloo out to traditional GWR (Great Western Railway) territory. Waterloo is arguably as short of paths as is Paddington so the opportunity for extra trains is limited, but Waterloo does have the merit of the very long former international platforms.
How many IET (Intercity Express Train) vehicles could fit into the former Eurostar platforms at Waterloo ? Would 9+9 fit ?

At a time of steadily rising passenger numbers, I do not feel it reasonable for the rail industry to simply state that the network is full and nothing beyond higher density trains and more standing can be done.

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: April 16, 2017, 18:30:00 »

An alternative might be to run some services from London Waterloo out to traditional GWR (Great Western Railway) territory. Waterloo is arguably as short of paths as is Paddington so the opportunity for extra trains is limited, but Waterloo does have the merit of the very long former international platforms.
How many IET (Intercity Express Train) vehicles could fit into the former Eurostar platforms at Waterloo ? Would 9+9 fit ?

Network Rail are currently in the process of shortening the old International platforms at both ends, to make more space for milling about (by passengers) and swapping tracks (by trains). I'm not sure how short they'll be - maybe 12 cars, maybe a bit more?  Which kind of answers that question - Waterloo is, after all, the terminal for SWT (South West Trains)/SWR» (South Western Railway - about) services.

I came across a picture showing them doing just that a few days ago, but I can't refind it just now.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #29 on: April 16, 2017, 18:35:02 »

At a time of steadily rising passenger numbers, I do not feel it reasonable for the rail industry to simply state that the network is full and nothing beyond higher density trains and more standing can be done.

Taking a typical 7 days, I would love to know
a) How many seats are provided into (say) Paddington?
b) How many of those seats are occupied?
c) How many people have to stand because there are no seats available on the train they're on?
d) How many people stand although there's seating available (e.g. elsewhere on the train, or the middle seat of 3)

Departures (ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about)) 18.2 million. Spread over 363 days = 50,000 per day.   I count 393 trains leaving in passenger service (that's counting Real Time trains for next Wednesday) which is 127 passengers per train.  So if evenly spread, there would be a seat for everyone if every train was 2 coaches.   But of course the 18:03 to Penzance is rather busier than the 11:36 to West Ruislip, the 06:27 to Oxford or the 23:03 or 23:10 services to Heathrow ...

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page