Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 06:35 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
06:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
06:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
07:00 Bedwyn to Newbury
07:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
07:49 Bedwyn to Newbury
08:13 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:23 Hereford to London Paddington
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 Bedwyn to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 06:35:27 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[82] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[76] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[74] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[67] Return of the BRUTE?
[57] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: South Eastern Franchise and Kent Route Study consultations  (Read 3208 times)
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« on: March 16, 2017, 20:41:27 »

You may have seen some of the headlines following DfT» (Department for Transport - about)'s announcement of a consultation about the next South Eastern franchise. They picked out one question - for example this from the Guardian:

Quote
First class could be axed in next Southeastern rail franchise

Department for Transport considers scrapping compartments in attempt to create more space on commuter trains

• Tell us: would scrapping first class improve the Southeastern service?

A Southeastern train in Greenwich, London. Trains could be refurbished in metro style with sideways-facing seats. Photograph: Alamy Stock Photo

Gwyn Topham Transport correspondent   Tuesday 14 March 2017 17.50 GMT

First class compartments could be scrapped on commuter trains into London under proposals for the next Southeastern rail franchise.

In an attempt to free up space on the busy commuter network, which handles 640,000 passenger journeys on 1,900 train services every weekday, the government is considering making all trains one standard class.

Trains could also be refurbished in “metro style” – removing traditional seating in favour of sideways-facing seats and more standing space.

While the Department for Transport could extend the length of some trains, possibly up to 12 carriages, that could involve costly infrastructure work at many stations and along the line, whereas scrapping first class would be a quick way to free up space.

The DfT has launched a 10-week consultation to hear views of passengers in south-east London, Kent and East Sussex, with the new franchise to be let from 2018.

Now the DfT web page doesn't mention this. The consultation document does, but rather vaguely:
Quote
A further consideration is the existing provision of First Class seating. We recognise that First Class tickets remain popular on certain routes, notably on the South Eastern main line to Sevenoaks, Tonbridge and Tunbridge Wells. However, removing it would create more room for passengers, which would be important during peak hours.
So it isn't clear how much 1st class they think might be removed, or from which services. I'm not familiar with the far side of south London, but AFAICS (As Far As I Can See) there isn't much 1st on the Metro services, and the ones DfT refer to are Main Line ones. It wouldn't make much room for passengers, as they suggest - only for standard class ones, as the 375s have 2+2 seating anyway. Oddly, under the heading "To reconfigure/rearrange/redesign/adapt trains" they don't mention converting to 3+2 (see under SWT (South West Trains) Portsmouth services and arguments thereabout).

Further down that Guardian article is this:
Quote
Campaigners welcomed the idea of scrapping first class compartments. Lianna Etkind, of the Campaign for Better Transport, said: “Overcrowding is a major problem and it can be galling to see people lounging comfortably in half empty first class carriages when you’re crammed nose to armpit in cattle class every day.”

First class carriages? Whole ones? On Southeastern? Really?

The other front runner is, of course, longer trains. The Metro routes in particular do seem to have a majority of stations already capably of taking 12-cr trains, so this looks an obvious move. However (as hinted in the question) it's still going to cost an arm and more than one leg. That's in the Kent Route Study, for which there is also a consultation (and link and prod from DfT) starting today.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2017, 07:04:51 »

I'm in danger of quoting from nearly 50 years back when I was a regular commuter to Sevenoaks and used to watch trainload upon trainload of the rather more affluent commuters flowing out of London.  It struck me as a very sharp peak in those days, with the traffic to Sevenoaks and beyond being quite different to intermediate traffic out on the suburban trains serving stations to Dunton Green or Bat and Ball.  Even in those days there was no first on the inner trains.

Passengers via Rochester and via Ashford (other "high-class" commuters in those days) have been improved with the Javalin services into St Pancras - and as an educated guess I would imagine that much / most of their first class traffic has gone onto the new faster service, leaving just services via Tunbridge Wells as the only full-distance ones uniquely inbound to Charing Cross / Cannon Street / Victoria (Eastern)
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2017, 10:02:23 »

NR» (Network Rail - home page) Southeast Route, that is the Kent and Sussex parts accounts for 25% of all the UK (United Kingdom)'s mainline train services and over 25% of NR budget / revenue.

The Kent routes and expanding in volumes of passengers quicker than any other route in the UK.

I suspect the proposed service to St Pancras from Hastings via Ashford will be bi-mode Javelins between Hastings and Ashford, and the HS1 (High Speed line 1 - St Pancras to Channel Tunnel) services will be stropped out of the SE franchise as separate franchise, Grayling seems keen on smaller franchises.

It is interesting the comment in the Evening Standard during the week about an outer orbital railway, the bolstering of the Tonbridge Redhill line this gives the potential of a Reading to at least Tonbridge service which could add to the argument to electrify the North Downs.

There is a bit of research going on at the moment about renewable energy and how it can be integrated into existing systems so a bi-mode train with a battery pack that is charged by electrification when available, by regen braking and by the on board genset (that way the genset does not run all the time only to top up the batteries after a train start of acceleration.
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2017, 11:10:48 »



It is interesting the comment in the Evening Standard during the week about an outer orbital railway, the bolstering of the Tonbridge Redhill line this gives the potential of a Reading to at least Tonbridge service which could add to the argument to electrify the North Downs.

There is a bit of research going on at the moment about renewable energy and how it can be integrated into existing systems so a bi-mode train with a battery pack that is charged by electrification when available, by regen braking and by the on board genset (that way the genset does not run all the time only to top up the batteries after a train start of acceleration.

I cant support the idea of an on board generator that starts and stops frequently since this increases wear and tear, reduces efficiency and gives more things to do wrong.
I would prefer to either have a large enough battery that no generator is needed, or if this is not viable, then to have a relatively small generator that runs continually on non electrified parts of the route. This generator could be sized for the AVERAGE power demand, with the battery supplying peaks and charging in troughs of power demand.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2017, 11:58:58 »

1st class on Southeastern are normal STD seating, simply fitted with a cloth over the top of the seats (I forget the 'technical' term. Yes, in their exclusive area, but removing this cloth and the 1st decals on the windows will be a simple job.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2017, 12:53:16 »

Technical term is 'Antimaccasars' - Maccasar Oil being a popular product used by men to condition the hair at the dawn of the railway age.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macassar_oil
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page