Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 10:55 19 Apr 2024
- Children among nine dead in Russia strike on Ukraine
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
08:48 London Paddington to Swansea
09:59 Cardiff Central to Taunton
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
Short Run
09:27 Carmarthen to London Paddington
09:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
11:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
16:31 Barnstaple to Axminster
Delayed
08:28 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2024, 11:00:46 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[159] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[146] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[59] Signage - not making it easy ...
[12] IETs at Melksham
[11] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
[10] From Melksham to Tallinn (and back round The Baltic) by train
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Italian train derails in Lucerne station 22 March 2017  (Read 3079 times)
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7163


View Profile
« on: March 22, 2017, 17:51:35 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):
Quote
Train derails in Switzerland trapping passengers
    36 minutes ago    From the section Europe

Image copyright EPA
The train at Lucerne, Switzerland, had been carrying 160 passengers

At least three people were injured when a train derailed while pulling out of a station in Switzerland, officials said.

Passengers were initially trapped when a carriage tipped on to its side at the station in Lucerne.

The incident occurred at about 14:00 local time (13:00 GMT) on Wednesday, Swiss Federal Railways (SBB) said.

There were 160 passengers on board the train, owned by Italian operator Trenitalia, which was travelling to Basel from Milan, Italy.

The fourth carriage of the train struck a power cable when it derailed, delaying rescue efforts, a spokesman for Lucerne police, Urs Wigger, said.

Lucerne police said the passengers were evacuated and at least three people required treatment and were taken to hospital. Their injuries are not thought to be life-threatening.

Services in and out of the station were suspended for the rest of the day, SBB said.

The cause of the derailment was not immediately clear.

Fortunately this happened at low speed, so injuries were quite minor. As you can see from the picture, it wasn't a cable that the train struck but an OHLE portal. That took out the whole station's traction power, so the disruption has been enormous.

It's being reported as both "Eurocity" and  "Cisalpino", but it doesn't look to me like one of the old tilting trains. Here's another picture, showing what a great place it's in for lifting by crane:
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7163


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2017, 23:21:38 »

This picture shows its face, from which I think it can be recognised as an Alstom ETR610 Cisalpino Due with Trenitalia's logo on its nose. So it is a tilter.

From International Business Times: Michael Buholzer/AFP/Getty Images.

Now, does that offer a specific explanation of how it derailed? Because it is an odd one - only one carriage involved, and it lurched over sideways far enough to demolish an OHLE portal and finish at an angle of more than 45o.
Logged
trainer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1035


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2017, 16:06:35 »

So it is a tilter.

So it would appear.  Roll Eyes
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2017, 14:22:58 »


Now, does that offer a specific explanation of how it derailed? Because it is an odd one - only one carriage involved, and it lurched over sideways far enough to demolish an OHLE portal and finish at an angle of more than 45o.

My thoughts are that this all happened at very low speed.  The only reason that the vehicles "behind" the derailed one are not derailed themselves may be because the train stopped quickly before those vehicles reached whatever (incorrectly set points/track defect/whatever) caused the derailment. 
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7163


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 25, 2017, 17:40:19 »

The swiss investigators (SESE/SUST/SISI/STSB) are quoted as saying the train derailed at points, and they are allowing the train to be mended enough to be taken to its depot in Italy. And, looking at those pictures again, the three carriages after the capsized one are only close to the track, not running on it. Moreover, that track isn't the one the front of the train is on. So a more likely explanation is that the back of coach 4 derailed and/or the points moved under it, so it was travelling slightly sideways and when one of its bogies was blocked it rolled over. But as always, time and investigation will tell.
Logged
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 515


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 26, 2017, 22:13:36 »

I wonder if those units have a Swiss or Italian driver?

One hypothesis of course is that it was an Italian driver and they somehow misunderstood a nuance of the Swiss signalling or Swiss German language, and went before they should have, with the points changing beneath the train.

Of course the other possibility is that it was a simple human error.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page