Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:35 28 Mar 2024
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
06:57 Swansea to London Paddington
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:54 Taunton to London Paddington
07:33 Weymouth to Gloucester
08:38 London Paddington to Westbury
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 09:13 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 09:44:23 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[193] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[109] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[75] Return of the BRUTE?
[59] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[26] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 16
  Print  
Author Topic: First / MTR win South Western franchise 2017 - 2024, and CMA raises competition concerns (merged topic)  (Read 86961 times)
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7154


View Profile
« Reply #135 on: April 11, 2017, 23:20:00 »

The platform extensions on Waterloo-Reading are now finished - Network Rail announced that on march 31st. The news also says that SWT (South West Trains) will start operating 10-car trains in May, as previously promised. So I guess that means the 458s are coming back "home".

Presumably the Windsor route will be taken over by 707s - that was the plan. The full complement of 15 trains won't be in place until November, but there should be easily enough to run the current service. And of course there are enough 458s to run the 4 tph Reading service. I think that's where I got the idea that that might start early - if the stock exists, and once the infrastructure (mainly Waterloo International) has been reconfigured, why not?

Well, of course the answer now lies in SWR» (South Western Railway - about)'s hands. Would they want to show willing, or not like to suggest SWT had already provisioned for it?
Logged
RichardB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958


View Profile
« Reply #136 on: April 12, 2017, 07:55:20 »

I think that's where I got the idea that that might start early - if the stock exists, and once the infrastructure (mainly Waterloo International) has been reconfigured, why not?

I'm guessing SWT (South West Trains) are employing additional traincrew for the increased services - depends on when their training is completed.   
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7154


View Profile
« Reply #137 on: April 12, 2017, 09:05:04 »

I think that's where I got the idea that that might start early - if the stock exists, and once the infrastructure (mainly Waterloo International) has been reconfigured, why not?

I'm guessing SWT (South West Trains) are employing additional traincrew for the increased services - depends on when their training is completed.   

I can only guess about that too. But there doesn't seem a lot of point getting in new trains (including the pseudo-new 458/5s) unless they are going to be used, and that needs drivers. Transferring staff to a new franchisee offers scope for all sorts of things to go wrong, but I don't think "too many drivers" is a likely one.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #138 on: April 12, 2017, 11:19:33 »

The current SWT (South West Trains) plans, involving the 10 car 458/5s to the Reading route and the 10 car 707s to the Windsor route, and a transfer of 450s elsewhere, followed by 10 car main suburban services from Dec 2017, (455+455+456 from P1-P4 at Waterloo) combine to provide the end results expected of the CP5 (Control Period 5 - the five year period between 2014 and 2019) HLOS (High Level Output Specification) capacity project.

Despite taking so long, they were a key feature of the DfT» (Department for Transport - about)'s 2012 HLOS.   It would be rather odd if the expected changes did not happen regardless of the franchisee changing, indeed the ITT (Invitation to Tender) expressly required the incoming franchisee to complete the introduction of the 707s into service.

Remember though that Waterloo International platforms do not become fully available until Dec 2018.  They reclose for more work immediately after the August blockade.  AFAICT (as far as I can tell) they are not needed for the Dec 2017 timetable, and 4 tph on the Reading line is already possible in the peaks without them.   It is probably the 4 tph to Windsor itself that needs the extra platform capacity.

Paul
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #139 on: May 11, 2017, 10:55:22 »

Oh dear: https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/firstgroup-and-mtr-south-western-rail-franchise-merger-inquiry
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #140 on: May 11, 2017, 10:57:03 »

No surprise really, I raised similar concerns on award....
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #141 on: May 11, 2017, 11:27:28 »

I predict the outcome will be 'no action needed'.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #142 on: May 11, 2017, 11:41:50 »

All depends - it's an EU» (European Union - about) request. They can override the UK (United Kingdom) Commission, if they think action is needed, and the UK do as you say....
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3457

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #143 on: May 11, 2017, 12:36:30 »

I see it no different to virgin having East and west coast. Two different routes with the same final destination
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #144 on: May 11, 2017, 12:38:30 »

AIUI (as I understand it) every franchise award over the last few years has been followed a few weeks later by this sort of CMA referral.   They never lead to any significant changes as far as I recall, so I wouldn't read anything significant into it...

Paul
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #145 on: May 15, 2017, 21:57:50 »

AIUI (as I understand it) every franchise award over the last few years has been followed a few weeks later by this sort of CMA referral.   They never lead to any significant changes as far as I recall, so I wouldn't read anything significant into it...

Paul

Must be seen to go through the motions, I suppose. Someone could complain more easily if the  CMA didn't look at it.
Logged

Now, please!
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #146 on: May 28, 2017, 08:47:29 »

This interesting link has been posted on the WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) forum: http://firstmtrswstaff.com
Logged
Oberon
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 186


View Profile
« Reply #147 on: May 28, 2017, 21:45:56 »

Reading this I get a feeling that the new franchisees aren't really interested in the Waterloo-Exeter line. This is a great pity, I feel its potential is enormous.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #148 on: May 28, 2017, 23:39:37 »

Reading this I get a feeling that the new franchisees aren't really interested in the Waterloo-Exeter line. This is a great pity, I feel its potential is enormous.
The ITT (Invitation to Tender) did not call for any changes on the Waterloo to Exeter line, that will be why. 

Apart from the widely discussed decision to replace all inner suburban rolling stock, there isnt really much at all in the First group offering that wasn't asked for by the service specification.

There was little scope to increase local services around Exeter/Honiton/Axminster as that improvement has effectively been allocated to the GW (Great Western) franchise, rather than the SW.

Paul
« Last Edit: May 28, 2017, 23:44:44 by paul7755 » Logged
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1450



View Profile
« Reply #149 on: May 29, 2017, 12:09:33 »

In addition the Network Rail RUS (Route Utilisation Strategy) for the Basingstoke to Exeter indicates that the infrastructure developments are dependent on decisions made concerning future rolling stock. The location of passing loops depends on the use of diesel or electric EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit). Now the latter is most unlikely, with the probability that the next control period will only fund basic work such is the over-run on current projects.
Another drawback is the sale of railway land as seen at Tisbury and now Crewkerne. Here the down yard has been sold, with an application for housing to be submitted. This together with the platform widening some years back means that the dynamic passing loop mentioned in the RUS will need to be located away from the station.
This could lead to the similar situation as seen at Tisbury where down trains have to be held until the up has passed. Likewise at Templecombe the platform changes mean that it would be expensive to extend the double track into the station. Again late running of down trains can force the up to wait until the down leaves.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 16
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page