Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:55 20 Apr 2024
- Three men killed in retail park car crash named
- Some Wales roads to revert to 30mph after backlash
- BBC presenter reports racist abuse on London train
- Three men killed in retail park car crash identified
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
20th Apr (1789)
Opening of Sapperton Canal Tunnel

Train RunningCancelled
07:55 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
10:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
18:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
19:19 Carmarthen to Swansea
Short Run
06:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
10:03 London Paddington to Penzance
11:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
11:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
14:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
Delayed
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
08:55 Paignton to London Paddington
09:09 Gloucester to Weymouth
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
21:07 Gloucester to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 20, 2024, 12:07:28 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[296] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[235] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[56] On reservations, fees and supplements - Interrail
[39] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[35] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[17] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16]
  Print  
Author Topic: First / MTR win South Western franchise 2017 - 2024, and CMA raises competition concerns (merged topic)  (Read 87271 times)
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« Reply #225 on: August 11, 2017, 16:09:56 »

They may not have a choice. Required to do the government's bidding, implementing McNulty, and be the buffer for the inevitable conflict with the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers), and maybe ASLEF» (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen - about) too.

What is franchising for? Shielding the government. Particularly when it is of a blue hue.

I find it perfectly believable that Stagecoach's bid including a promise to keep guards on all services. That being a reason their bid was unsuccessful.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6298


View Profile
« Reply #226 on: August 11, 2017, 17:03:23 »

I find it perfectly believable that Stagecoach's bid including a promise to keep guards on all services. That being a reason their bid was unsuccessful.
Deliberately so?
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12357


View Profile Email
« Reply #227 on: August 15, 2017, 12:00:17 »

It may be a requirement of the franchise?....Similar to Southern/GTR.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #228 on: August 15, 2017, 12:15:34 »

It may be a requirement of the franchise?....Similar to Southern/GTR.
It isn't mentioned in the Southwestern ITT (Invitation to Tender), except in the context of a standard requirement for any new rolling stock to include the hardware capability (a bit like the IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.)).  The Southern (i.e. TSGN) ITT was completely different in regards to this subject, but even it did not explicitly ask for more DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) operation to be brought in, it just reads that existing DOO operation had to be maintained.

Paul
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12357


View Profile Email
« Reply #229 on: August 15, 2017, 12:29:19 »

There will be confidential clauses agreed that don't appear in the public domain
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #230 on: August 18, 2017, 21:47:16 »

SWT (South West Trains) have published a 'Goodbye' document: http://www.stagecoach.com/about/our-companies/src=/~/media/Files/S/Stagecoach-Group/Attachments/pdf/swt-supplement-mr-edition.pdf
Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #231 on: August 21, 2017, 09:43:10 »

And so it begins:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-40965413

Quote
BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

The new South Western rail franchise holder has been criticised by a union for allegedly refusing to guarantee a second staff member on board its forthcoming trains.

FirstGroup takes over on Sunday amid ongoing disputes over driver-operated doors and the role of train guards.

The company said it would be "retaining a second person" on board trains.

The RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) union said in talks the firm refused to provide a guarantee "despite what they have been telling the press".

cntd

« Last Edit: August 21, 2017, 12:00:32 by chrisr_75 » Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7163


View Profile
« Reply #232 on: November 28, 2017, 13:49:49 »

SWR» (South Western Railway - about) have been finger-pointing at SWT (South West Trains) in public about giving up on maintenance and cleaning after they found  they would lose the franchise - unless the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) invented that entirely.

This was on BBC South this morning. While the SWR suit only promised a new, cleaner, future for hie trains, Paul Clifton, the voice over, and the studio introduction all made that specific claim about SWT. They showed a "deep clean", though it didn't look so very deep to me, saying there hadn't been one for ages. But surely it takes more than six months to get a train that grubby? 

This is all rather unusual, and out of line with the agreement among bits of "the railway" (which may be unwritten) not to use blame and point-scoring against each other.

Oddly, the trains I've though looked a bit sad were the revised 458s - maybe because I knew they'd been rebuilt, and all the interiors altered, but then found must of the floors and seats unchanged.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7163


View Profile
« Reply #233 on: November 28, 2017, 22:45:20 »

This was on BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) South this morning. While the SWR» (South Western Railway - about) suit only promised a new, cleaner, future for hie trains, Paul Clifton, the voice over, and the studio introduction all made that specific claim about SWT (South West Trains). They showed a "deep clean", though it didn't look so very deep to me, saying there hadn't been one for ages. But surely it takes more than six months to get a train that grubby? 

This evening's BBC South introduction quantified a "deep clean"; SWR say they do one every 30 days where SWT did them every 210 days. (That's longer than from franchise announcement to end, of course.) Sounds more like part of a routine cleaning schedule to me, but it's still rather childishly "cleanlier than thou".
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page