Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:15 28 Mar 2024
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
- Baltimore Bridge Collapse
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
06:57 Swansea to London Paddington
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:54 Taunton to London Paddington
07:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:34 Exeter Central to Okehampton
08:38 London Paddington to Westbury
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:23 London Paddington to Swansea
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
06:50 Westbury to Weymouth
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 09:13 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 09:18:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[146] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[117] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[80] Return of the BRUTE?
[63] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[49] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[27] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: New Plymouth MP to work for better London rail link  (Read 6934 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« on: June 12, 2017, 06:27:50 »

From the Plymouth Herald

Quote
Plymouth's newest MP (Member of Parliament) has left the city for Westminster – and has already started campaigning for a better rail connection from his seat.

Labour's Luke Pollard, who won the seat from Conservative Oliver Colvile, left Plymouth railway station today with a send-off from supporters and colleagues.

[snip]

However, even from his seat on the Great Western train to Paddington, Mr Pollard appeared keen to get his message across, saying he was willing to work with Conservative MPs in the region to ensure Plymouth finally got a better rail link to London.

I'm noting a priority on London and not rail links in and around the region.  That figures, I suppose, because Mr Pollard's going to be personally doing a lot of travel between Paddington and Plymouth ... and because improvements are already planned when the 802s start running, so he's assured of getting what he wants prior to the end of a five year term.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2017, 17:12:33 »

From the Plymouth Herald

Quote
Plymouth's newest MP (Member of Parliament) has left the city for Westminster – and has already started campaigning for a better rail connection from his seat.

Labour's Luke Pollard, who won the seat from Conservative Oliver Colvile, left Plymouth railway station today with a send-off from supporters and colleagues.

[snip]

However, even from his seat on the Great Western train to Paddington, Mr Pollard appeared keen to get his message across, saying he was willing to work with Conservative MPs in the region to ensure Plymouth finally got a better rail link to London.

I'm noting a priority on London and not rail links in and around the region.  That figures, I suppose, because Mr Pollard's going to be personally doing a lot of travel between Paddington and Plymouth ... and because improvements are already planned when the 802s start running, so he's assured of getting what he wants prior to the end of a five year term.

I suspect he may be keen on securing something more substantial than a 6 minute improvement to journey times between London & Plymouth, a more frequent service & less of the cattle truck conditions experienced by those travelling to the Westcountry on Fridays/Bank Holidays, and back from the Westcountry on Sundays......that should keep him busy for a while! 😃
Logged
Umberleigh
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2017, 18:18:32 »

Wait until he gets crammed into a five car 802* for three hours, then he'll have something to moan about

(*we all know it's gonna happen)
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2017, 21:09:49 »

Wait until he gets crammed into a five car 802* for three hours, then he'll have something to moan about

(*we all know it's gonna happen)

Can I have a go on your crystal ball please?!  Wink
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2017, 12:50:48 »

Wait until he gets crammed into a five car 802* for three hours, then he'll have something to moan about

(*we all know it's gonna happen)

I thought that I was the only member to have such negative thoughts on the new trains !
And yes of course it is going to happen, hopefully not all the time though.
I have no doubt that services that are expected to be busy every day will be diagrammed for a pair of DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit), but what about when one breaks, perhaps due to running "un muzzled"
Or when the single unit due into Plymouth from further west is delayed and the other single unit to which it was due to be attached at Plymouth therefore goes to London on its own.(cant risk delay minutes by waiting for the delayed unit, no crew and/or no path for the two DMUs to go independently to London.)

And of course the modern railway does not cater for peak flows, so a normally lightly loaded service booked for a single DMU, will still be a single unit no matter how busy on say a holiday weekend.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 513


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2017, 22:36:21 »

Wait until he gets crammed into a five car 802* for three hours, then he'll have something to moan about

(*we all know it's gonna happen)

I thought that I was the only member to have such negative thoughts on the new trains !
And yes of course it is going to happen, hopefully not all the time though.
I have no doubt that services that are expected to be busy every day will be diagrammed for a pair of DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit), but what about when one breaks, perhaps due to running "un muzzled"
Or when the single unit due into Plymouth from further west is delayed and the other single unit to which it was due to be attached at Plymouth therefore goes to London on its own.(cant risk delay minutes by waiting for the delayed unit, no crew and/or no path for the two DMUs to go independently to London.)

And of course the modern railway does not cater for peak flows, so a normally lightly loaded service booked for a single DMU, will still be a single unit no matter how busy on say a holiday weekend.

The 802's are designed to run to the west with higher HP, larger cooler groups, resistance grids and fuel tanks, so they aren't going to be stretched beyond what was originally envisaged.

I've said it before and will say it again. This is Hitachi's big chance to prove that they can deliver a quality product to the rest of Europe, and particularly that their Italian plants can deliver a quality product after the disasters of the Danish IC4 and Dutch Fyra units. They badly want to win the rolling stock contract for HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) and will not be leaving anything to chance.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2017, 13:18:38 »

Wait until he gets crammed into a five car 802* for three hours, then he'll have something to moan about

(*we all know it's gonna happen)

Can I have a go on your crystal ball please?!  Wink

You might do better to try my crystal ball* I have a good one, the latest model in fact!
My crystal ball has successfully predicted the following.
1) that most of the new trains would be significantly shorter than existing stock.
2) that most of the seating would be bus airline style without tables.
3) that no buffet would be provided.
4) that the new trains would have underfloor engines, and therefore be DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) despite a reluctance to call them thus.

My crystal ball also forecast that although the second batch of improved DMUs for longer distance services "could" have a buffet, that they would not actually have any such.

And various other negative predictions regarding new and less reliable signalling and time and money overruns re electrification.

*terms and conditions apply to crystal ball hire.

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2017, 14:13:08 »

Quote
but what about when one breaks

Your crystal ball constantly talks about having a 5 car breaking down therefore only a 5 car on its own will run. Surely running 5 cars is better than a 9 car breaking down with no alternative and therefore the service is cancelled throughout. This is also better than at present when an HST (High Speed Train) breaks down, or longrock not having enough sets and running a 2 car from Penzance to Exeter with no follow on service (with HST starting at Bristol) which has happened many a time over the years.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 17, 2017, 15:03:08 »


2) that most of the seating would be bus airline style without tables.


I thought photos had been published that show the IETs (Intercity Express Train) with more tables than GWR (Great Western Railway)'s 'high capacity' HSTs (High Speed Train)...

Paul
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2017, 15:25:24 »


2) that most of the seating would be bus airline style without tables.


I thought photos had been published that show the IETs (Intercity Express Train) with more tables than GWR (Great Western Railway)'s 'high capacity' HSTs (High Speed Train)...

Paul

I believe that you are correct, but only because the high capacity HSTs suffered such a downgrade. Indeed a cynic like me would suggest that the removal of most of the tables, and the abolition of many proper buffets was to prepare passengers for the new DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit).
"look, they are no worse than the old trains"
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Umberleigh
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2017, 16:05:07 »

Quote
but what about when one breaks

Your crystal ball constantly talks about having a 5 car breaking down therefore only a 5 car on its own will run. Surely running 5 cars is better than a 9 car breaking down with no alternative and therefore the service is cancelled throughout. This is also better than at present when an HST (High Speed Train) breaks down, or longrock not having enough sets and running a 2 car from Penzance to Exeter with no follow on service (with HST starting at Bristol) which has happened many a time over the years.

They will probably be most reliable (provided they pass the sea water test). But a 5 car is 3 shorter than what is provided at present, and will inevitably be substituted for a 9 car on occasions. Plus underfloor engines, no buffets, high density seating... sorry, but it sounds like a Voyager to me, so can only hope lessons have been learnt re smells and claustrophobic interiors
Logged
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2017, 17:33:56 »

Quote
But a 5 car is 3 shorter than what is provided at present
I was referring to when a 5 car breaks down as part of a 10, therefore only 5 cars continue, if an 8/9 car breaks down you have a 0 car train operating, 5 cars being more useful than 0.

Quote
no buffets
The idea of train travel is to get from A to B and I personally don't think trains require the need for full buffets. If you require 5 star dining in a train then you have services such as the Pullman/Northern Belle etc. You don't have full meals whilst in a car or whilst travelling via coach/bus, so why should train travel be any different. I do however feel that a micro buffet/trolley should be provided at least.

Yes the voyagers smell but those weren't made by Hitachi, the Javelins were however and I've always enjoyed my journeys through Kent on them (despite having to use them to visit the in-laws!) so we'll have to wait and see regarding that aspect
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page