Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:35 29 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:08 Newbury to Bedwyn
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
10:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:41 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 09:38:52 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[64] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[59] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[58] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[52] Return of the BRUTE?
[36] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Train delays  (Read 5986 times)
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 589


View Profile Email
« on: June 15, 2017, 22:27:19 »

Over the past several months, every evening the Crosscountry 16:30 train from BTM (Bristol Temple Meads (strictly, it should be BRI)) to Edinburgh has 'parked' outside BPW» (Bristol Parkway - next trains) for several minutes. Why? Is the timetable too tight, or are GWR (Great Western Railway) useless at running trains on time and freeing up platform 3?

Over the years, I have experienced many minutes on trains stuck outside stations waiting for platforms to be cleared, but only Reading station up to 2011/12 has equalled these delays in waiting for a platform.

Is there a known issue?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40691



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2017, 22:44:21 »

Today the 15:56 Cardiff to Paddington was 12 minutes late, and that held it up.   The Cardiff train was 6 minutes late yesterday, 4 minutes late on Tuesday (and the Edinburgh just 2 late), and Monday's delays were identical to Tuesday's.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 589


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2017, 09:26:24 »

Thanks for the update.

So the next question,

  • is the timetable too tight
  • are GWR (Great Western Railway) not capable of running to a timetable
  • does BPW» (Bristol Parkway - next trains) require more capactity
Logged
rower40
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 292

Turning signalling into a video game since 1988.


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2017, 10:10:37 »

Thanks for the update.

So the next question,

  • is the timetable too tight
  • are GWR (Great Western Railway) not capable of running to a timetable
  • does BPW» (Bristol Parkway - next trains) require more capactity


(Meekly holds hand up slowly.  Gets ready to run for cover...)
The timetable for Bristol Parkway shows:
1L74 (1524 Swansea to Paddington) arr 1630H, dep 1633 platform 3.
2D20 (1615 Bristol TM(resolve) to Bristol Parkway) arr 1634 platform 4
1S55 (1425 Plymouth to Edinburgh) arr 1638, dep 1639H.

2D20 leaves Filton Abbey Wood at 1626H, and has a 3.5 minute pathing allowance approaching Bristol Parkway, so that it is meant to follow 1L74.
But the ARS (Automatic Route Setting) programming gets it wrong - it "thinks" that it can get 2D20 over the junction ahead of 1L74. If the signaller doesn't catch it in time, then 2D20 goes first, causing delay to 1L74, meaning it can't vacate its platform in time to prevent delay to 1S55.

But the good news: I'm doing a fix to the ARS logic (due to be installed in November) to sort this out.
Logged
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1244



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2017, 11:03:51 »

Thanks Rower,

Please also could you have a look at the ARS (Automatic Route Setting) logic that holds traffic on the Down Relief at Didcot East Junction.  I have spent too many minutes of my life at that locality - often being passed by an Up Local (showing the route into Didcot is clear) yet continuing to wait for a further conflicting crossing on the junction ahead.  Like the love of God - it passeth all understanding.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2017, 11:21:53 »

Another place the ARS (Automatic Route Setting) seems slow on the uptake is coming into Padd on Line 6 waiting by Royal Oak LUL (London Underground Ltd) for a platform. The Down train seems to have gone past  a long time before we move.
Logged
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 589


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2017, 11:33:26 »

Thanks rower for the update.

Obviously, as rail demand increases, some bright spark will have to consider someways to increase the capacity of places like BPW» (Bristol Parkway - next trains), possibly with A|B platforms.
Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2017, 11:47:00 »

I believe the intent is to add a new platform at BPW» (Bristol Parkway - next trains)
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 16, 2017, 13:53:35 »

I believe the intent is to add a new platform at BPW» (Bristol Parkway - next trains)

Indeed, and there are closures in the 'reasonably near future' for at least some of the required work:

https://www.gwr.com/travel-updates/planned-engineering/autumn-upgrade-2017

Paul

 
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2017, 14:07:08 »

The new platform won't help matters as it will be in the down direction.  The additional platform in the up direction was added a few years ago, but the movements described by rower40 are conflicting, so the two moves can't take place in parallel despite the extra platform.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 16, 2017, 14:09:39 »

The new platform won't help matters as it will be in the down direction.  The additional platform in the up direction was added a few years ago, but the movements described by rower40 are conflicting, so the two moves can't take place in parallel despite the extra platform.

If the new platform 1 is used for the terminators from the south, instead of platform 4, that would remove the conflicts. Whether it will be used that way is another matter.
Logged
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1499


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 19, 2017, 19:11:19 »

According to that esteemed organ of non fake news, otherwise known as the Bristol Evening Post, printed in Didcot.....Platform 11 at Temple Meads is closed because the heat has caused the expanding bitumen in the edging slabs to push them out of alignment, with the possibilty that trains could be scraped.

I wonder if they missed an extra letter p in that last word ?!
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 19, 2017, 20:08:55 »

The new platform won't help matters as it will be in the down direction.  The additional platform in the up direction was added a few years ago, but the movements described by rower40 are conflicting, so the two moves can't take place in parallel despite the extra platform.

If the new platform 1 is used for the terminators from the south, instead of platform 4, that would remove the conflicts. Whether it will be used that way is another matter.

That's a very good point. Let's hope they do.
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 19, 2017, 20:38:36 »

If the new platform 1 is used for the terminators from the south, instead of platform 4, that would remove the conflicts. Whether it will be used that way is another matter.

According to the signalling scheme plan I have seen there will be no connection from the Filton direction to allow northbound trains to directly access the new platform no.1

Health Warning: The plan I have seen is dated 2011 (yes, the new platform has been planned for that long!)
« Last Edit: August 20, 2017, 22:52:05 by Chris from Nailsea » Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 19, 2017, 22:20:10 »

Thanks for the clarification. (Though on a point of detail I didn't make the comments quoted as mine.)
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page