Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 00:55 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningShort Run
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 01:14:27 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[98] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[97] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[86] Return of the BRUTE?
[74] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[23] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: The story of a thriving local railway and how it got more trains running  (Read 12238 times)
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: July 09, 2017, 21:27:16 »

"Penryn Station is unusual", yes, but the idea of a passing loop with one long platform is NOT "unique for the UK (United Kingdom)"; Dovey Junction has one too. Dovey Junction doesn't have a footbridge either, the only passenger access on and off the platform is by train or across a barrow crossing. The layout of Dovey Junction is something like this:

Pwllheli/Porthmadog/Barmouth <--------_______________
                                                                                      \_______________________________ ---------->  Machynlleth/Shrewsbury
                                                                    ||||PLATFORM||||PLATFORM||||                  /
Aberystwyth       <------------------------------____________________________________/
                                                                                           \_________________/

Sorry, I don't seem to be very good at drawing with keyboard characters, but hopefully you get the idea.

Another possible solution for the TransWilts can be found further east on the Cambrian line, at Welshpool. There is a 'dynamic loop' there, basically a very long passing loop. The idea is that trains don't have to wait for each other in order to pass. As it happens Welshpool station is on the double track section but the same principle could potentially be applied with a station on the single track and a long passing loop which allows trains to pass each other without either having to stop and wait for the other.

Once a line has a mixed usage with commuter, high speed and freight, then the ability to increase throughput at regular intervals is very limited.
Sounds like the south Wales main line between Cardiff and Bridgend / Port Talbot. Only double track, so the freight and Maesteg stoppers have to share tracks with fast services and no loops at the stations either so the stopping passenger trains cannot be overtaken.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #16 on: July 09, 2017, 21:39:49 »

"Penryn Station is unusual", yes, but the idea of a passing loop with one long platform is NOT "unique for the UK (United Kingdom)"; Dovey Junction has one too. Dovey Junction doesn't have a footbridge either, the only passenger access on and off the platform is by train or across a barrow crossing.

We could play semantics ... "Penryn Station is unusual (indeed unique for the UK?) in that it has one long platform rather than two opposite each other" and I could say that Dovey junction has two platforms on opposite sides of an island, with one extended ... but (to be honest) I had overlooked Dovey Junction as I used to use it quite a bit "once upon a time, a very long time ago" which is before the extension was put in.

Seems Dovey Junction was done in 2008, Penryn in 2009 - so surely they were in planning in parallel, knowing how excruciatingly slow it is to get this sort of thing done.

Quote
Sorry, I don't seem to be very good at drawing with keyboard characters, but hopefully you get the idea.

It makes the point excellently!

Quote
Another possible solution for the TransWilts can be found further east on the Cambrian line, at Welshpool. There is a 'dynamic loop' there, basically a very long passing loop. ...

Indeed - there are a whole lot of options ... the background for this thread was the Penryn story and to learn from how it's been implemented rather than to turn it into another TransWilts thread  Grin
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: July 10, 2017, 11:21:13 »

I think this kind of single platform with passing loop design is common in New Zealand. Not sure, but someone on here will know for sure!
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: July 10, 2017, 15:00:02 »

I think this kind of single platform with passing loop design is common in New Zealand. Not sure, but someone on here will know for sure!


Having travelled extensively in New Zealand by rail I cannot recall any station of this design.

I do recall one station in Auckland where the train "backed into" the platform but this has been eliminated in recent years with the modernisation and electrification of the Auckland suburban network.

Anyway, New Zealands railways have many track level platforms onto which passengers alight down four or five steps. If I can find it I will scan and post a photo of a remote station, Pukerangi, which has a passing loop and a single white painted wooden building but no discernable platform to speak of.

Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: July 10, 2017, 15:21:56 »

I think this kind of single platform with passing loop design is common in New Zealand. Not sure, but someone on here will know for sure!


Having travelled extensively in New Zealand by rail I cannot recall any station of this design.

I do recall one station in Auckland where the train "backed into" the platform but this has been eliminated in recent years with the modernisation and electrification of the Auckland suburban network.

Anyway, New Zealands railways have many track level platforms onto which passengers alight down four or five steps. If I can find it I will scan and post a photo of a remote station, Pukerangi, which has a passing loop and a single white painted wooden building but no discernable platform to speak of.


Okay!
(On the general topic of platform designs, some stations in Poland have platforms each side of several single tracks, each track having two platforms and each platform serving two tracks, so you have "platform-track-platform-track-platform" (etc) rather than "platform-track-track-platform". In the pre-WWI Russian division, I think. It allows passengers to get in and out either side of the train but I don't think it has any other advantages, except perhaps in the oldfashioned days of manual goods loading.)
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #20 on: July 10, 2017, 16:50:41 »

On the general topic of platform designs, some stations in Poland have platforms each side of several single tracks, each track having two platforms and each platform serving two tracks, so you have "platform-track-platform-track-platform" (etc) rather than "platform-track-track-platform". In the pre-WWI Russian division, I think. It allows passengers to get in and out either side of the train but I don't think it has any other advantages, except perhaps in the oldfashioned days of manual goods loading.

I've seen that at airports and other high density short runs - also lifts - where people get out one side while the next lot get on at the other.  Also Munich Hauptbahnhof underground / suburban (February picture) and adjacent stations.  Would probably be useful at St Ives too.



Still have a double-sider at Yeovil Pen Mill, and had them in my youth at Sevenoaks.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: July 10, 2017, 17:22:10 »

I've seen that at airports and other high density short runs - also lifts - where people get out one side while the next lot get on at the other.  Also Munich Hauptbahnhof underground / suburban (February picture) and adjacent stations.  Would probably be useful at St Ives too.
Sometimes called the 'Spanish Solution' or 'Barcelona Solution' where it was widespread on the metro stations, although there are examples built way before that including King William Street in 1895.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: July 10, 2017, 17:31:34 »

Stratford westbound Central line opens both sides, also Barking eastbound District Line.   On and off flows both ways.  On the other hand Tower Gateway DLR (Docklands Light Railway) opens both sides, with theoretically off and on separate sides - according to the signage.

AIUI (as I understand it) at most locations where modern 'heavy rail' EMU (Electric Multiple Unit)/DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) services call, only one side will ever be opened as that is the only means of normal operation for the vast majority of door control systems.

Places such as Greenford, Ascot, Guildford and the pre-modernisation Reading had two sided through platform trackss, or bays, but only one side was opened on power door stock.

Paul
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #23 on: July 10, 2017, 21:18:14 »

Sevenoaks Graham? Which two platforms were they?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #24 on: July 10, 2017, 21:27:36 »

Sevenoaks Graham? Which two platforms were they?

In those days they were known as 1 and 2 (where the suburban service from Charing Cross reversed) and 5 and 6 (where the suburban service from Holborn Viaduct reversed).  8 or 10 car on peak services from 1/2 - 2 x 4 EPB + 1 x 2 EPB, and 8 cars from platforms 5/6  2 x 4 EPB.   As the peak time approached, 4 car trains arrived from London, went out to the sidings to attach more carriages ready for their peak cycles.  And after the peak, they carried on our to drop off the extra 4 or 6 before the y continued into the daytime or evening.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #25 on: July 10, 2017, 21:57:00 »

There are two island platforms there, so ehere were 5 & 6?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #26 on: July 10, 2017, 22:10:32 »

There are two island platforms there, so ehere were 5 & 6?

There were 4 tracks. The westmost and eastmost tracks, which now only have faces to the island, also had faces on the outside.  So platforms 1&2 on the first track, 3 on the second track, 4 on the third track, and 5&6 on the fourth track.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #27 on: July 10, 2017, 22:18:30 »



Sevenoaks Railway Station

The train about to depart (for London) is Diesel Multiple Unit 1011. These units were built at BR (British Rail(ways)). Eastleigh Works specifically for the London to Hastings line and were narrower than normal - two seats on either side of a central corridor rather than a two/three split.

Copyright Andy Parrett and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence.
from http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/4344808
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #28 on: July 11, 2017, 09:39:36 »

Thanks, before my commuting days started in the late 70s.....never knew.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: July 11, 2017, 10:15:12 »

I seem to have led to the comprehensive derailment of this thread. That wasn't my intention!
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page