Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:55 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
* A view from inside ship that hit Baltimore bridge
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
19:02 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
19:04 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 15:09:43 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[127] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[80] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[59] Who needs a travel agent these days?
[44] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[34] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[32] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: What now for Valleys electrification  (Read 7208 times)
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« on: July 21, 2017, 12:06:38 »

Given the cancellation of various electrification schemes, what future is there for the Valleys electrification, which the Welsh Government is currently saying will still go ahead.  Is it time to be truly innovative to try and keep the costs down?

One of the biggest costs is bridge raising, even more so since the goalposts in terms of clearance have changed recently.  Could a new emu fleet avoid this by facilitating neutral sections under each bridge.  A small battery in each emu could normally be used to produce a kick start on acceleration (thus providing a day to day benefit), but a small amount of charge would always be retained as insurance in the event that a unit got stuck in a neutral section.  Come to think of it, with all the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) fleet having diesel engines, why wouldn't the SW main line be similarly engineered?

Has NR» (Network Rail - home page) missed a trick here, or am I missing something?

 
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: July 21, 2017, 12:12:09 »

Come to think of it, with all the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) fleet having diesel engines, why wouldn't the SW main line be similarly engineered?

The idea of having sections of electrification out in the boondocks, where line speeds are fast and bridges are few, has been floated; not sure how far it got, or if it's still live.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 21, 2017, 15:56:05 »

What flavour electricity do tram systems use? Isn't generally 750v DC (Direct Current)? And what flavour electricity do the third rail networks in Mersyside and the Network South East (NSE (Network South East)) area use? Isn't that also 750v DC?

All the new stock built for the NSE 3rd rail area since privatisation has been dual-voltage capable, so rather than neutral sections could you just drop the voltage to 750v for the low bridges? I guess there would be issues trying to isolate the different voltages from each other, and possibly with both power sources from the same pantograph rather than the 750v supply coming from a third rail shoe but you did say "truly innovative". Alternatively, do for bridges what the 3rd rail network does with level crossings and have gaps (neutral sections) in the electrification system but multiple pickup points on the train (two shoes for 3rd rail, two pantographs in the case of OHLE) to avoid the need for batteries.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 21, 2017, 15:59:09 »

What flavour electricity do tram systems use? Isn't generally 750v DC (Direct Current)? And what flavour electricity do the third rail networks in Mersyside and the Network South East (NSE (Network South East)) area use? Isn't that also 750v DC?

All the new stock built for the NSE 3rd rail area since privatisation has been dual-voltage capable, so rather than neutral sections could you just drop the voltage to 750v for the low bridges? I guess there would be issues trying to isolate the different voltages from each other, and possibly with both power sources from the same pantograph rather than the 750v supply coming from a third rail shoe but you did say "truly innovative". Alternatively, do for bridges what the 3rd rail network does with level crossings and have gaps (neutral sections) in the electrification system but multiple pickup points on the train (two shoes for 3rd rail, two pantographs in the case of OHLE) to avoid the need for batteries.

I suspect dropping to 750v for the couple of seconds taken to pass the bridge and back again wouldn't be worth it.  Under normal circumstances the train could coast pass, and it's only in the very rare situation whereby a train comes to a halt at precisely that point that there would be an issue.
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 21, 2017, 16:37:14 »

In the early days of 25kv electrification there were a number of reduced voltage sections and lines where clearances were reduced to the absolute minimum.  The voltage used was 6.25kv and switching between the two voltages was carried out automatically onboard the trains/locomotives.

Personally, for areas such as the Welsh Valleys, I believe that reducing the cost should be considered by using the lower 6.25kv arrangement and using BR (British Rail(ways)) MK3 OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE").
« Last Edit: July 21, 2017, 16:48:27 by SandTEngineer » Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 21, 2017, 18:08:39 »

In the early days of 25kv electrification there were a number of reduced voltage sections and lines where clearances were reduced to the absolute minimum.  The voltage used was 6.25kv and switching between the two voltages was carried out automatically onboard the trains/locomotives.

Personally, for areas such as the Welsh Valleys, I believe that reducing the cost should be considered by using the lower 6.25kv arrangement and using BR (British Rail(ways)) MK3 OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE").

Why were those sections taken out and changed to 25kV?
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 21, 2017, 21:28:09 »

In the early days of 25kv electrification there were a number of reduced voltage sections and lines where clearances were reduced to the absolute minimum.  The voltage used was 6.25kv and switching between the two voltages was carried out automatically onboard the trains/locomotives.

Personally, for areas such as the Welsh Valleys, I believe that reducing the cost should be considered by using the lower 6.25kv arrangement and using BR (British Rail(ways)) MK3 OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE").

Why were those sections taken out and changed to 25kV?

Reducing the voltage means the current goes up therefore the OLE conductor size is larger and hence the weight of the OLE increases ............ heavy OLE larger structure to support it also in the case of the 6.25kV reduced speed.

The 6.25kV schemes allowed BR to retain the old 1500 V dc OLE clearances under bridges, it did mean extra wayside equipment transformers, circuit breakers and cables; as insulator technology improved and BR's engineers understanding of dynamic clearances allow the removal of the 6.26kV.

The designs of 25kV OLE are not suitable for 750V dc the current is too high and the volt drop too great, the other issue with 750V dc is the number of sub stations compared to higher voltages.  A better option would be 1500V dc the same as the Tyne & Wear metro, also I believe some tram systems use 1500V dc when they are non street running like the Manchester tram.

There is another method used by NR» (Network Rail - home page) in Scotland to run 25kV OLE through low over bridges and that is to use an earthed section of contact wire; the train VCB (Vacuum Circuit Breaker - electrification) is tripped and reset by an APC the same way as a neutral section, the train just coasts through the earthed section.
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1244



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 22, 2017, 07:14:15 »

There is another method used by NR» (Network Rail - home page) in Scotland to run 25kV OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE") through low over bridges and that is to use an earthed section of contact wire; the train VCB (Vacuum Circuit Breaker - electrification) is tripped and reset by an APC the same way as a neutral section, the train just coasts through the earthed section.

If for some reason a train was gapped in such a section - after, say, emergency braking, etc. - is there a way to move it under power using shed leads for instance, or must it wait for a shove from behind?
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: July 22, 2017, 07:33:07 »

There is another method used by NR» (Network Rail - home page) in Scotland to run 25kV OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE") through low over bridges and that is to use an earthed section of contact wire; the train VCB (Vacuum Circuit Breaker - electrification) is tripped and reset by an APC the same way as a neutral section, the train just coasts through the earthed section.

If for some reason a train was gapped in such a section - after, say, emergency braking, etc. - is there a way to move it under power using shed leads for instance, or must it wait for a shove from behind?

First the sections are short 20 or 30 meters so the likelihood of being stranded in a dead spot is very small, these earthed sections are only used for bridges and not tunnels, the signalling would also need to be assessed to ensure the earthed sections are not located where a signal my require a train to slow down or in its acceleration point past a signal.   

Shed leads are now fixed trolley systems so loose leads are not used, Electricity at Work Regs etc.

The use of earthed sections would based on a Designers Risk Assessment something like a Drivers emergency braking and train being stranded in the earthed section would likely to come out as Improbable ie a once in 50 to 100 year occurrence and the consequence to safety ie the risk of injury or death very low.   Inconvenient if it should happen but not a danger   
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 22, 2017, 11:37:05 »

There is another method used by NR» (Network Rail - home page) in Scotland to run 25kV OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE") through low over bridges and that is to use an earthed section of contact wire; the train VCB (Vacuum Circuit Breaker - electrification) is tripped and reset by an APC the same way as a neutral section, the train just coasts through the earthed section.

If for some reason a train was gapped in such a section - after, say, emergency braking, etc. - is there a way to move it under power using shed leads for instance, or must it wait for a shove from behind?

The standard way of changing over between overhead voltages is to coast across an insulated (and perhaps earthed) section. This may seem surprising, and of course it's rare here, but pretty common elsewhere - e.g. France with 25kV/1500VDC and Germany or France with tram-trains.

While (as usual) almost every way of doing this has been tried somewhere sometime, the consensus now is that you provide one pantograph per unit, tell it what to expect and switch it over, but provide fast-acting switchgear so it will change automatically and not be destroyed by the wrong voltage (which could be more difficult than snow!).

EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) up to four cars usually have 1 pan (e.g. 387s), and tram-trains do too - they are even shorter. Five-cars seem to be 1-pan too if suburban (e.g. 707s - yes they are DC (Direct Current), but they have a bit of flat roof for a pan), but IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) have two. Above eight cars two is usual, and sixes and sevens are too rare to really say.

While designs vary, a lot now put the electronics and motors on one self-contained vehicle, and about half of a train made up of those motor cars. The pantograph goes on a trailer of its own, due to the weight of the transformer (mainly) and switchgear. Power is then fed to the motor cars at some suitable "low" voltage, such as 750V up to 3kV - most likely as DC.

So longer trains, or multiple units, can rescue themselves from stranding with another pantograph. Short ones can't, and have to wait for the next train to come along, and do whatever the rules demand about giving another train a shove. OK for trams, otherwise I suspect it's going to be a slow procedure. Obviously the trick is to make sure it's very rare.

It does occur to me that one of the few things that's likely to strand a train is stopping to push another one at just that point ... so I guess you'd be best to couple them first.

I read somewhere that for 25kV OLE it is usual to put manual isolating switches between the tracks of a line, so each track can be disconnected individually, and that means there is an isolating gap there too. While you'd never intend to stop part-way across such a crossover, you could well be going very slowly - so is that a potential issue?
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: July 22, 2017, 16:26:43 »

the sections are short 20 or 30 meters so the likelihood of being stranded in a dead spot is very small, these earthed sections are only used for bridges and not tunnels, the signalling would also need to be assessed to ensure the earthed sections are not located where a signal my require a train to slow down or in its acceleration point past a signal.
One possible problem I can see with dead sections in the ValleyLines OHLE is that those lines have many stations, meaning bridges could be very near stations (so trains will be going slowly and not have much momentum for coasting).

One big worry is Cathays (not somewhere I've seen for myself), where there is not only a low footbridge at the station but also a building built above the track. I've only been on a ValleyLines service north of Queen Street once (I spotted Cathays with Google Earth) so there could be more difficult spots like that.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #11 on: July 22, 2017, 16:38:49 »

If there's serious concern about trains getting occasionally stranded in dead sections, there's an old article in the Daily Mail about an onboard generator. With one of these tucked under the driving console, could the train be peddled out of trouble?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: July 22, 2017, 17:22:35 »

One big worry is Cathays (not somewhere I've seen for myself), where there is not only a low footbridge at the station but also a building built above the track. I've only been on a ValleyLines service north of Queen Street once (I spotted Cathays with Google Earth) so there could be more difficult spots like that.

I have used Cathays many times.  Yes there is a footbridge, but so have many stations. The Cardiff University buildings built over the line are relatively modern and I would be surprised if BR (British Rail(ways)) had not required sufficient clearance for electrification. They usually did.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: July 22, 2017, 20:31:31 »

If there's serious concern about trains getting occasionally stranded in dead sections, there's an old article in the Daily Mail about an onboard generator. With one of these tucked under the driving console, could the train be peddled out of trouble?
Are you thinking of selling the stranded train, perhaps on Ebay, or of pedalling it along the track? If the latter, you might want to get Cardiff boy Geraint Thomas to help!  Cheesy
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: July 22, 2017, 20:52:42 »

...you might want to get Cardiff boy Geraint Thomas to help!  Cheesy

And there's his team-mate Luke Rowe, also a Cardiff lad, for a tandem effort!
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page