Firstly, several of the top 10 only entered the list by virtue of having a couple of minutes added to their journey time to make the services more reliable given the London Bridge work. This took them above the 20 min threshold beyond which only seating capacity is used, rather than seating plus a notional allocation for standing passengers. This is explained in the report but conveniently ignored by Labour.
More importantly, to base one's judgement of overcrowding on the railways in general on the ten worst services identified each year is a bit like basing inflation on the item in the survey which has gone up most. It's far too simplistic.
That's interesting, thanks, I'm surprised that the
DfT» didn't use that analysis to rebut the article.