Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 22:15 28 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:30 Shalford to Reading
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
22:10 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 22:27:40 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[104] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[103] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[78] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[56] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Return of the BRUTE?
[25] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: London better than New York for transportation - but where is Bristol?  (Read 4761 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« on: August 17, 2017, 15:13:47 »

From UK (United Kingdom) Business Insider

Quote
I rode London's famous Underground system for a week — and I saw why New York's subway will never catch up

It was the summer of hell, and I needed some relief.

To take a break from the swamp that New York City becomes in the summer, I took a week-long trip to the sunny paradise of London for a well-deserved vacation.

OK, fine. London may not be that sunny, but it is a transportation paradise. When comparing it to New York, anyway, London seems like a city that actually cares about its public transportation. Its trains run often, its buses have a priority network, and there's even a congestion charge for private cars driving in the city center, which feeds money back into the transportation projects.

Things are not so great in New York right now. The state and city are in an interminable battle to escape blame for the crumbling infrastructure that millions of New Yorkers rely on every day. But some fixes being suggested now, like congestion charging, have already been at work in London for years.

I decided my vacation would be a good opportunity to see how London's public transportation system works. Not once did I get stuck in a tunnel or even have to wait longer than four minutes for a train — and with countdown clocks at nearly every station, I always knew when the next train was coming. I also never had to detour because of track work, which is done overnight in London.

I think it's best summarized in the status update you hear over the PA (Public Address) system every so often in the Underground: "There is good service on all London Underground lines." You definitely don't hear that every day in New York.

While New York often uses the age of its system as an excuse, I saw how London overcame its ancient architecture — some of which dates back to the mid-19th century — to build a modern transportation system. Honestly, it felt strange to be in a city where the denizens didn't constantly gripe about how long it took to get wherever they were.

[continues]

So ... how would you compare other UK cities ??
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2017, 17:11:51 »

The NY subway has one great advantage over the Tube in that it is air conditioned.  I would be more inclined to call the Tube a "swamp" than the Subway.

The NY network does however is filthy and has an uncared for look about it which the Tube doesn't these days.  But in terms of getting you where you need to go at an affordable price they are both very good. 
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: August 17, 2017, 17:54:30 »

The subway has double tracks allowing during-the-day maintenance...big bonus
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 17, 2017, 17:59:06 »

The subway has double tracks allowing during-the-day maintenance...big bonus

and 24 hour service
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: August 17, 2017, 18:09:17 »

....because its got double tracks and can run & maintain at once
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 17, 2017, 19:27:43 »

....because its got double tracks and can run & maintain at once

......and it doesn't have the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers).
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 17, 2017, 19:39:42 »

I think this is mainly a reaction to a recent run of incidents and accidents. For example, just looking for train failures and derailments that lead to evacuation in tunnels, there were two in July (one due to an emergency break application that cause a derailment and shorted the third rail causing a fire - or at least a lot of smoke), one in June, another in May ...
Logged
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 17, 2017, 20:08:49 »

Although we've had two minor incidents at Oxford Circus and Holborn in the past week.
Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 17, 2017, 23:58:07 »

It's also not that often you hear the 'good service on all London Underground lines' message either. There's ongoing weeknight closures in the Met, problems with the night tube, Overground always seems to have a section closed somewhere or other. And the recent incidents as already mentioned.

I suspect if the author had stayed for, maybe a month or two, the novelty would've worn off and his or her rose tinted spectacles would be letting through a lot more light...!
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 18, 2017, 11:16:05 »

Interesting to hear that perhaps familiarity does indeed breed contempt and that when you look at something as an 'outsider' with a fresh pair of eyes (even if behind rose tinted spectacles) our railway systems actually often compare very well with elsewhere.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: August 18, 2017, 12:54:48 »

Yes, but as far as we know he didn't try GWR (Great Western Railway)Wink
Logged
trainer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1035


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: August 18, 2017, 14:40:57 »

Arriving at the foot of the stairs (not escalator) in a central London Underground station (can't recall which one - possibly Paddington (PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains))) I saw a man from the USA with a great deal of luggage and a frown looking up the steps.  'Is their no elevator?' he asked.  'I'm afraid this is London: only stairs,'  I wearily explained as I picked up my own suitcase.  He was not impressed.  He had travelled through St Pancras International (STP) so the first impression had been good.  Then came the reality. I'm sure things are much better now but last time I travelled the same way (June) I couldn't even get a through train to PAD from STP (changing at Baker Street essential) and with luggage it can be a bit of an ordeal to navigate the system -  and worse of course for those who need step-free access.

The complexity of bus stops (and bus station) in Bristol to get to where you want to go is worse for the visitor I think. Yesterday (17.08.17) I tried to explain to two senior visitors to Bristol how to get to the Suspension Bridge or the SS Great Britain by bus having arrived in the Bus Station.  They decided the Broadmead shops would suffice after it became obvious that it wasn't straightforward to change and although I knew the bus route numbers I couldn't remember where the stops were.  Clearly not unique to Bristol (try finding a specific bus in Birmingham - or even a train to Stratford-upon-Avon if arriving at New Street) but we are not there yet in easy access public transport and cross (or even inter-) mode travel.

Having said all that, having looked at some US based travelogues they think the British system is good.  I suppose it all depends where you stand as to what you see.
Logged
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: August 19, 2017, 17:47:11 »

Some Londoners don't agree
Logged
trainer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1035


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: August 20, 2017, 14:12:52 »

The current editor of the Evening Standard may have had an opportunity to increase funding to the Underground to help deal with some of the deficiencies in a previous job.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: August 20, 2017, 15:08:14 »

It's also not that often you hear the 'good service on all London Underground lines' message either. There's ongoing weeknight closures in the Met, problems with the night tube, Overground always seems to have a section closed somewhere or other. And the recent incidents as already mentioned.

I suspect if the author had stayed for, maybe a month or two, the novelty would've worn off and his or her rose tinted spectacles would be letting through a lot more light...!

I'd have to challenge that - the Underground's reliability and performance is far ahead of where it was 10/15/20 years ago, and I'm quite familiar with the "Good service on all lines" message as I head into London every morning.

Obviously if you have data that demonstrates the opposite I'm happy to review that position

If only we could say the same of GWR (Great Western Railway).
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page