Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:15 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
07:20 Reading to Gatwick Airport
08:13 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:23 Hereford to London Paddington
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
07:24 Exmouth to Paignton
07:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:41 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 08:34:11 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[77] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[72] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[70] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[63] Return of the BRUTE?
[56] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[44] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Its signalling Jim, but not as we know it ..  (Read 820 times)
lbraine
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 138


View Profile
« on: January 23, 2024, 07:55:28 »


I recently hasd the pleasure of ambling across central Wales on train and noted the lack of signalling - or to be exact, the lack of signals themselves.

From Welshpool to Aberstwyth and Pwllheli there are not a signal in sight.

The whole Cambrian line seemed to be operated by radio signals - presumably connected to the locomotive cab. Whilst watching the magnificant scenery pass by I was left pondering about this signalling system and its implications:

1. could this be used elswhere across the West, perhaps on lesser used lines or branch lines.
2. was my presumption that over the longer term this would be a significant cost saving to running the lines as the hardware infrastrure of the signalling was removed from any equation
3. how robust has it been (I could not find much information about it onine). My observation over a week of travel was that it seemed very reliable and even allowed for some sophisticated movements ie - trains sharing platforms at station (Machynlleth)

Just posting in case anyne has more information and insight - and I am always open to education !
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2024, 09:08:49 »

From an earlier thread:
Quote
The Cambrian lines were equipped in 2011 with a pilot installation of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System.)▸ ), a form of railway signalling. ERTMS removes the need for signals along the track by transmitting data directly to the train. This data is used to display movement authorities and other information such as temporary and permanent speed restrictions, on a screen in front of the driver.

Very much a pilot installation on a "small" line, and even now the first major ETCS (European Train Control System) implementation has only just started; full ERTMS isn't even planned. So I wonder if this installation, already orphaned technology at the time of the accident, may need replacing before long with something more conventional.
« Last Edit: January 23, 2024, 09:43:37 by stuving » Logged
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1302


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2024, 09:54:03 »

The current system might have the disadvantage that, this involving single line with passing loops, it requires that all trains pause for some time at a passing loop, so progress is a bit pedestrian. (Or I might have misunderstood what's required or perhaps unlucky with every train I took).

The line up the coast is around half an hour slower end-to-end than it was in the nineteen eighties, though whether this is the changed signalling, line speeds, different requirements at flat crossings, additional rationalisation of the infrastructure, or a combination of these is another matter.

Mark
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2024, 10:49:14 »

From an earlier thread:
Quote
The Cambrian lines were equipped in 2011 with a pilot installation of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System.)▸ ), a form of railway signalling. ERTMS removes the need for signals along the track by transmitting data directly to the train. This data is used to display movement authorities and other information such as temporary and permanent speed restrictions, on a screen in front of the driver.

Very much a pilot installation on a "small" line, and even now the first major ETCS (European Train Control System) implementation has only just started; full ERTMS isn't even planned. So I wonder if this installation, already orphaned technology at the time of the accident, may need replacing before long with something more conventional.

Yes it was very much a pilot scheme, one of the challenges was retro fitting all of the ERTMS equipment into the rolling stock; a lot of compromises. 

A lot of lessons were learned, especially for the Automatic Train Control (ATO (Automatic Train Operation)) in the Thameslink Core and the scheme planned and now being installed for the East Coast Mainline
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
lbraine
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 138


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2024, 12:30:56 »

I've read the replies as saying:

1. it was/is a pilot project.
2. seems to work - but not perfect (cost of in cab work)
3. good lessons learnt to pass on to future generations of technology (dives for Wikipedia for ATO (Automatic Train Operation))

As for line speeds - my experience going westward was the Class 158/159s did a healthy 60-70mph.

Going eastbound - we did have a couple of lengthy (10-15min) pauses at passing loops - perhaps more typical of Single Line Operation that the signalling system.

As ever - thanks for all the informed help.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2024, 13:42:16 »

From an earlier thread:
Quote
The Cambrian lines were equipped in 2011 with a pilot installation of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System.)▸ ), a form of railway signalling. ERTMS removes the need for signals along the track by transmitting data directly to the train. This data is used to display movement authorities and other information such as temporary and permanent speed restrictions, on a screen in front of the driver.

Very much a pilot installation on a "small" line, and even now the first major ETCS (European Train Control System) implementation has only just started; full ERTMS isn't even planned. So I wonder if this installation, already orphaned technology at the time of the accident, may need replacing before long with something more conventional.

Could you give a short reminder of what the accident was - just for new readers who don't know about it. Obviously.
Logged

Now, please!
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40691



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2024, 17:25:13 »

Could you give a short reminder of what the accident was - just for new readers who don't know about it. Obviously.

http://www.passenger.chat/19379

Quote
During the morning of Friday 20 October 2017, a train driver travelling on the Cambrian coast line in North Wales reported that long standing temporary speed restrictions were not indicated on their in-cab display. As signalling staff at the control centre in Machynlleth investigated this report, they became aware that this failure applied to several trains under their control. The temporary speed restrictions were required on the approach to level crossings so that people crossing the line had sufficient warning of an approaching train.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2024, 19:40:27 »

Could you give a short reminder of what the accident was - just for new readers who don't know about it. Obviously.

http://www.passenger.chat/19379

It was just a software problem! For more detailed details, follow the link.

People used to joke, darkly, about signalling systems like ETCS (European Train Control System) being dependent for their safety on the software teams that write the stuff, who know nothing about railway signalling, never making any mistakes. (Now such scare stories are about AI.) This was an example, as the safety-critical parts of the system were not (RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) said) really at SIL4 as required.

Speed restrictions are stored centrally, and sent to the train by radio. Temporary ones are loaded from a file, which involves a number of servers, with several processes running on each. One of those processes stopped, and none of the others, or anything else, registered that. But the display the signallers had to check the TSRs (Temporary Speed Restriction) were being sent out said they were when they weren't.

Which proves what? That writing software to this kind of high integrity level and getting it right  is hard, and checking it's been done right is hard too. Basing this one in part on an existing system, but not the basis for any further work, made some of this harder still. What it says more generally about the practicability of making such high-integrity systems for a reasonable cost - or at all - is by no means clear.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 02, 2024, 07:28:47 »

Could you give a short reminder of what the accident was - just for new readers who don't know about it. Obviously.

http://www.passenger.chat/19379

It was just a software problem! For more detailed details, follow the link.

People used to joke, darkly, about signalling systems like ETCS (European Train Control System) being dependent for their safety on the software teams that write the stuff, who know nothing about railway signalling, never making any mistakes. (Now such scare stories are about AI.) This was an example, as the safety-critical parts of the system were not (RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) said) really at SIL4 as required.

Speed restrictions are stored centrally, and sent to the train by radio. Temporary ones are loaded from a file, which involves a number of servers, with several processes running on each. One of those processes stopped, and none of the others, or anything else, registered that. But the display the signallers had to check the TSRs (Temporary Speed Restriction) were being sent out said they were when they weren't.

Which proves what? That writing software to this kind of high integrity level and getting it right  is hard, and checking it's been done right is hard too. Basing this one in part on an existing system, but not the basis for any further work, made some of this harder still. What it says more generally about the practicability of making such high-integrity systems for a reasonable cost - or at all - is by no means clear.

One method to monitor is to have a watch dog server / system or more than one.  A system that has the same data as the operational servers and systems (there is always at least 2) and does the check of what the Signaller sees against what the Driver and ground equipment sees and vis versa .................. of course there is a high cost to such systems and will have its own software issues.

The installation on that line was seen very much as a test bed, perhaps the project team had disbanded and it was being run as BAU without the very high level of technical monitoring and support that a development project would have
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page