Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:55 28 Mar 2024
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
* How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
07:33 Weymouth to Gloucester
08:38 London Paddington to Westbury
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 09:13 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 10:09:36 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[193] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[109] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[75] Return of the BRUTE?
[59] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[26] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 78
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion  (Read 283340 times)
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #360 on: October 03, 2018, 09:35:46 »

All depends on how many marginal seats there are in Bristol at the next election!

...none, at the last count. But Bath, on the other hand, might be.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #361 on: October 04, 2018, 08:46:24 »

Remember the furore over the Over-Head Line Equipment (OHLE) through Goring?  Well this is the outcome, from the Henley Standard:

"LANDOWNERS in the Goring area can apply for grants from Network Rail to improve plots that adjoin the Great Western main line through the village.

The company is offering sums of between £10,000 and £100,000 to offset the impact of the electrification of the route, which started in 2015 and prompted complaints about the “unsightly” metal gantries that were installed to hold up overhead cables.

Network Rail promised to consider installing alternative designs but progress stalled as opponents said these wouldn’t reduce the visual impact. Now the company says it wants to support any projects which would result in new woodland being planted, enhance existing woodland or improve access between wooded areas.

The deadline for applications is October 26 and applicants should be able to deliver their schemes over a four-year period.

For more information, visit www.trustforoxfordshire."

Edit: VickiS - Clarifying Acronym
« Last Edit: May 21, 2021, 11:50:46 by VickiS » Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #362 on: October 04, 2018, 11:02:30 »

I'm going to take a wild stab and guess that the URI should read https://www.trustforoxfordshire.org.uk/

They'll need to be tall trees, won't they? Isn't it the problem that the railway is on an embankment as it passes through Goebbels Gap?
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #363 on: October 04, 2018, 22:34:46 »

Quote
Posted by: Gordon the Blue Engine
Insert Quote
Remember the furore over the OHLE through Goring?  Well this is the outcome, from the Henley Standard:

"LANDOWNERS in the Goring area can apply for grants from Network Rail to improve plots that adjoin the Great Western main line through the village.

The company is offering sums of between £10,000 and £100,000 to offset the impact of the electrification of the route, which started in 2015 and prompted complaints about the “unsightly” metal gantries that were installed to hold up overhead cables.

Network Rail promised to consider installing alternative designs but progress stalled as opponents said these wouldn’t reduce the visual impact. Now the company says it wants to support any projects which would result in new woodland being planted, enhance existing woodland or improve access between wooded areas.

The deadline for applications is October 26 and applicants should be able to deliver their schemes over a four-year period.

For more information, visit www.trustforoxfordshire."

This has nothing to do with the outcry in the Goring Gap over the visual impact of the OHL (Over-Head Line).

It is offsetting for the vegetation removal all along the line necessitated by the preparatory works for electrification. This money has been on offer for some years. They have had difficulties in getting environmental groups to come up with woodland habitat to mitigate the loss of trackside trees and scrub. If you know of a suitable project (not just in Oxfordshire, but also elsewhere along the route), get in touch.

As regards reducing the visual impact, whisper it abroad here in the Gap (a beautiful part of the world!), but my guess is that Network Rail (NR» (Network Rail - home page)) are just waiting for the steelwork to weather from its original shiny finish to a more discreet matt grey and hope everyone forgets the fuss.

Edit: VickiS - Clarifying Acronym
« Last Edit: May 21, 2021, 11:51:37 by VickiS » Logged
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #364 on: October 05, 2018, 08:55:01 »

Eightonedee may well be right, but it looks like Network Rail (NR» (Network Rail - home page)) have successfully sold their woodland habitat scheme to Goring as at least a partial solution to their concerns about the Over-Head Line Equipment (OHLE). 

By the way, the correct link is  www.trustforoxfordshire.org.uk/network-rail-1.


Edit: VickiS - Clarifying Acronym
« Last Edit: May 21, 2021, 11:52:23 by VickiS » Logged
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #365 on: October 06, 2018, 11:01:06 »

Quote
Overhead wiring is complete except for a section east of Newbury racecourse

You refer to the gap at Kennet Viaduct, where there are power lines that cross the track (not far above where the Over-Head Line Equipment (OHLE) wires will be once installed).

A lot of contractors and plant on the site when I had a look around yesterday. Not sure how they're going to resolve, but assume that whatever the plan is it will be carried out during the final blockade (8th Oct for 4 days).

Updating my previous post....went for a look around at Kennet Viaduct earlier. Road closure at the end of Hambridge Lane due "overhead power line removal". It looked like some of the lines are already down, with those over the tracks still in place. I guess those will come down (and the missing Over-Head Line Equipment (OHLE) wires will go up) during the coming week's blockade.

Edit: VickiS - Clarifying Acronym
« Last Edit: May 21, 2021, 11:53:21 by VickiS » Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #366 on: October 07, 2018, 08:06:24 »

Quote
Overhead wiring is complete except for a section east of Newbury racecourse

You refer to the gap at Kennet Viaduct, where there are power lines that cross the track (not far above where the OHLE wires will be once installed).

A lot of contractors and plant on the site when I had a look around yesterday. Not sure how they're going to resolve, but assume that whatever the plan is it will be carried out during the final blockade (8th Oct for 4 days).

Updating my previous post....went for a look around at Kennet Viaduct earlier. Road closure at the end of Hambridge Lane due "overhead power line removal". It looked like some of the lines are already down, with those over the tracks still in place. I guess those will come down (and the missing OHLE wires will go up) during the coming week's blockade.


Dealing with the wayleaves for the DNO (Distribution Network Operator) & TNO (Transmission Network Operator) (Distribution Network Operator and Transmission Network Operator) where they cross the railway has been long and complex issue; some of the wayleaves date back to the 1930's where the height of the DNO/TNO above the railway was acceptable add in the mix the rail is higher due to greater ballast depth, in the it all boiled down to who was going to pay
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7154


View Profile
« Reply #367 on: October 07, 2018, 11:08:52 »

Updating my previous post....went for a look around at Kennet Viaduct earlier. Road closure at the end of Hambridge Lane due "overhead power line removal". It looked like some of the lines are already down, with those over the tracks still in place. I guess those will come down (and the missing OHLE wires will go up) during the coming week's blockade.

Having had a quick look at Google's latest pictures, this line appears to be an MV link (two circuits) of SSEN» (Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks - website)'s from the Thatcham bulk supply point (opposite the station) or the substation behind it to the Riverside substation in Newbury. Having gone over the railway, it only runs about 400 m into town before going underground, so maybe they will now bury the whole of that section. There is a 33 kV feed between the two sites, but I think this is 11 kV so probably links the two substations, and the 33 kV line is a bit further north.

At first sight, the obvious way to increase the clearance would be taller poles, wouldn't it? But perhaps, being on an embankment, doing that here would exceed the maximum permitted pole height. At Thatcham, there do seem to be two MV lines still crossing the railway from the BSP (Bulk Supply Point) or the substation behind it; though of course this is level ground, which eases the pole height issue.

In fact all the MV lines from there start off in cables, indoors where the switchgear now is, even if they come up onto poles within the "Thatcham Power Plant" boundary. A little to the west, several lines that must come from there too pop up out of the ground and set out across the canal. I guess digging trenches across the canal never was a popular job.

Incidentally, why is the bridge - and it is just a skew bridge - over the canalised river called a viaduct (officially Bull's Bridge Viaduct)?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #368 on: October 07, 2018, 11:58:09 »

Difficult to confirm from aerial views, but maybe it’s a viaduct structure that is used instead of an embankment for the westward continuation towards and over the next road?  Another possibility is that it was a more typical multiple arched structure when first built?

Paul
Logged
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #369 on: October 07, 2018, 12:55:09 »

From my quick look around, and judging by what also looks like some digging sites (hard to tell as they have tent-like structures over them) I'd say the wires are going to be buried.

The pole heights already looked quite high to me (sorry, should have got a pic) due to track being on something of an embankment for the bridge over the Kennet (and the small road under-bridge at the end of Hambridge Lane).
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #370 on: October 10, 2018, 20:25:03 »

Updating my previous post....went for a look around at Kennet Viaduct earlier. Road closure at the end of Hambridge Lane due "overhead power line removal". It looked like some of the lines are already down, with those over the tracks still in place. I guess those will come down (and the missing OHLE wires will go up) during the coming week's blockade.

Having had a quick look at Google's latest pictures, this line appears to be an MV link (two circuits) of SSEN» (Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks - website)'s from the Thatcham bulk supply point (opposite the station) or the substation behind it to the Riverside substation in Newbury. Having gone over the railway, it only runs about 400 m into town before going underground, so maybe they will now bury the whole of that section. There is a 33 kV feed between the two sites, but I think this is 11 kV so probably links the two substations, and the 33 kV line is a bit further north.

At first sight, the obvious way to increase the clearance would be taller poles, wouldn't it? But perhaps, being on an embankment, doing that here would exceed the maximum permitted pole height. At Thatcham, there do seem to be two MV lines still crossing the railway from the BSP (Bulk Supply Point) or the substation behind it; though of course this is level ground, which eases the pole height issue.

In fact all the MV lines from there start off in cables, indoors where the switchgear now is, even if they come up onto poles within the "Thatcham Power Plant" boundary. A little to the west, several lines that must come from there too pop up out of the ground and set out across the canal. I guess digging trenches across the canal never was a popular job.


The minimum (modern) electrical safety clearance is difficult to meet, the railway requires 3 metres for the nearest DNO (Distribution Network Operator) live parts to any of the railway OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE") equipment, there is also risks on both parties of energising each others conductors in the event the DNO aerial conductors were to drop onto NR» (Network Rail - home page) OLE conductors; and then there is the pain in the !!!! when the DNO need to maintain repair their system it is often difficult fitting them in with normal railway possession and they don't like paying for railway approved contractors to manage their access.
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #371 on: October 10, 2018, 22:34:54 »

Quote
From my quick look around, and judging by what also looks like some digging sites (hard to tell as they have tent-like structures over them) I'd say the wires are going to be buried.

The pole heights already looked quite high to me (sorry, should have got a pic) due to track being on something of an embankment for the bridge over the Kennet (and the small road under-bridge at the end of Hambridge Lane).

Had another quick look around today. The power lines are down, the last of the poles were being pulled out of the ground as I passed. The Over-Head Line Equipment (OHLE) wires are up over Kennet Viaduct, which is one of the last sections to be completed between Southcote Jct and Newbury.

Edit: VickiS - Clarifying Acronym
« Last Edit: May 21, 2021, 11:54:55 by VickiS » Logged
mjones
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 408


View Profile
« Reply #372 on: October 15, 2018, 10:50:23 »

Does anyone know the latest on when IETs (Intercity Express Train) will use electrical power to Swindon? Earlier in this thread September was mentioned, but clearly btthat has slipped.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #373 on: October 15, 2018, 13:07:03 »

In test conditions, now.  In passenger service, turn of the year I think.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #374 on: October 15, 2018, 15:49:40 »

As II says, should be turn of the year and that will be down as far as Bristol Parkway.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 78
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page