Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:35 28 Mar 2024
* Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
17:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
Delayed
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 16:49:50 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[132] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[53] Return of the BRUTE?
[44] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 78
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion  (Read 283379 times)
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #465 on: November 02, 2018, 17:35:30 »

Good picture in this evening's Bristol Post, showing the state of electrification at Hatchet Road (just after Bristol Parkway):

Image from Bristol Post
Incidentally, I can't help noticing that this is another bridge where the height warning is given in US Customary units only - is there a pattern emerging here? https://goo.gl/maps/uEs1mQrrHaC2


Open Top Rail Replacement Services now, might be a first. Luckily there were no passengers on board.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #466 on: November 02, 2018, 19:11:20 »

Full marks to the "huge steel barrier," which worked as intended.

Quote
The bus hit the bridge with such force that the roof of the bus was sheared clean off, and the bus continued on for a few more yards before coming to a stop.
A few more yards? It looks like about three bus lengths from the point where it first hit the bridge.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #467 on: November 02, 2018, 20:35:42 »

Full marks to the "huge steel barrier," which worked as intended.

The full quote is "An initial inspection of any impact damage to the bridge revealed the bridge came through the experience unscathed - a huge steel barrier at the entrance to the bridge took the full force of the bus's roof, and protected the bridge as intended."

Well, they are still running trains over that "barrier" - it's the the northern, steel, bridge put there some time after the Severn Tunnel and the line from Wootton Bassett were built. That is 15'2" up, which is plenty to take a double-decker under - so it didn't hit it. It hit the brick arch, having failed to move out to the middle of the road, which is why the roof in the picture on Bristol Live lies under the steel bridge. Draw your own conclusions about the reporting!

Logged
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 633


View Profile
« Reply #468 on: November 02, 2018, 21:29:26 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) News has a video of the actual incident involving the bus hitting the bridge:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-46077532
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #469 on: November 03, 2018, 11:39:42 »

Full marks to the "huge steel barrier," which worked as intended.

The full quote is "An initial inspection of any impact damage to the bridge revealed the bridge came through the experience unscathed - a huge steel barrier at the entrance to the bridge took the full force of the bus's roof, and protected the bridge as intended."

Well, they are still running trains over that "barrier" - it's the the northern, steel, bridge put there some time after the Severn Tunnel and the line from Wootton Bassett were built. That is 15'2" up, which is plenty to take a double-decker under - so it didn't hit it. It hit the brick arch, having failed to move out to the middle of the road, which is why the roof in the picture on Bristol Live lies under the steel bridge. Draw your own conclusions about the reporting!

Information posted elsewhere suggests there isn't a bridge protection beam there and the bus hit the brick arch after clearing the parallel steel span.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2018, 12:17:54 by SandTEngineer » Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #470 on: November 03, 2018, 12:22:05 »

Full marks to the "huge steel barrier," which worked as intended.

The full quote is "An initial inspection of any impact damage to the bridge revealed the bridge came through the experience unscathed - a huge steel barrier at the entrance to the bridge took the full force of the bus's roof, and protected the bridge as intended."

Well, they are still running trains over that "barrier" - it's the the northern, steel, bridge put there some time after the Severn Tunnel and the line from Wootton Bassett were built. That is 15'2" up, which is plenty to take a double-decker under - so it didn't hit it. It hit the brick arch, having failed to move out to the middle of the road, which is why the roof in the picture on Bristol Live lies under the steel bridge. Draw your own conclusions about the reporting!
Information posted elsewhere suggests there isn't a bridge protection beam there and the bus hit the brick arch after clearing the parallel steel arch.

As you suggest there clearly isn't a CPB - this is the view from where the bus entered:

https://goo.gl/maps/e1N696vDEnp

...and this is the view from the other side:

https://goo.gl/maps/QfoiS3VqA312

Edit: corrected Google Maps links

Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #471 on: November 03, 2018, 13:12:20 »

Full marks to the "huge steel barrier," which worked as intended.
The full quote is "An initial inspection of any impact damage to the bridge revealed the bridge came through the experience unscathed - a huge steel barrier at the entrance to the bridge took the full force of the bus's roof, and protected the bridge as intended."

Well, they are still running trains over that "barrier" - it's the the northern, steel, bridge put there some time after the Severn Tunnel and the line from Wootton Bassett were built. That is 15'2" up, which is plenty to take a double-decker under - so it didn't hit it. It hit the brick arch, having failed to move out to the middle of the road, which is why the roof in the picture on Bristol Live lies under the steel bridge. Draw your own conclusions about the reporting!
Information posted elsewhere suggests there isn't a bridge protection beam there and the bus hit the brick arch after clearing the parallel steel arch.
As you suggest there clearly isn't a CPB - this is the view from where the bus entered:
https://goo.gl/maps/e1N696vDEnp
...and this is the view from the other side:
https://goo.gl/maps/QfoiS3VqA312
Edit: corrected Google Maps links

.... and very apt that the second link should show a double decker turning right into the Bristol Parkway Estate.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #472 on: November 03, 2018, 13:48:15 »

When approached from the north side there are no white lines on the bridge to point out the need to be in the centre of the road.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #473 on: November 03, 2018, 14:00:55 »

When approached from the north side there are no white lines on the bridge to point out the need to be in the centre of the road.

That's true - and I'm sure there should be. But look left from the initial Street View and there's a roadside sign, plus a dashed line on the road. However, given that the first bridge hides the second, I'd expect words and arrows on the road too (plus those width lines). Note that from the other side there is no line on the road, though there is the same roadside sign.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #474 on: November 03, 2018, 17:48:58 »

Good picture in this evening's Bristol Post, showing the state of electrification at Hatchet Road (just after Bristol Parkway):

Incidentally, I can't help noticing that this is another bridge where the height warning is given in US Customary units only - is there a pattern emerging here? https://goo.gl/maps/uEs1mQrrHaC2
Streetview shows that there are advance signs in both metric and imperialunits on the approach, and also instructions to use the centre of the road.

Paul
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #475 on: November 03, 2018, 18:03:54 »

The rules - Traffic Signs Manual: Chapter 4 - say this about composite bridges:
Quote
COMPOSITE BRIDGES
7.25 Some bridges originally built as arches have been adapted with the addition of girders or beams. Where the arch is the lowest part, the whole structure should be signed as an arch bridge. Black and yellow striped plates (to highlight the profile of the arch) should be suspended from the bridge beam, together with further plates on the arch itself.

The signage it specifies for an arch bridge of this width includes a single chord (as on the north side) plus the roadside signs at the bridge which look right. There should also be advance signs and "route avoiding" arrows on other signs; I din't know if they are present here.

How often do you see an arch-shaped dangly thing under a bridge? Not often! The manual has more to say about them (straight ones are also used):
Quote
7.27 Experience has shown that these suspended plates will themselves be struck from time to time and that rigidly-mounted aluminium substrates are not suitable. Rubber or other flexible material should be used for the backing, suspended by means of chains or hinges fixed securely to the bridge structure by a method agreed with the bridge owner. The plates should not be fixed rigidly by screws or bolts to the face of the bridge, as there is a greater risk than with flexibly-suspended plates of them being dislodged and falling onto vehicles on the road beneath. The use of rubber-backed plates will help to avoid annoyance to nearby residents from the noise of hanging metal plates striking the bridge structure in wind or vehicle slipstream. It is recommended that the yellow parts of the marking should be retroreflective; they may also be fluorescent (see para 7.6). When the signs are lit, the plates should also be lit whenever practicable. This is particularly helpful where a girder bridge is followed by a more restrictive arch bridge.

And finally, road markings, which are in TSM (Track Section Manager) Chapter 5:
Quote
HIGH VEHICLE MARKINGS AT ARCH BRIDGES
22.5 All bridges with a headroom of less than 16'-6"should be clearly signed. (Arch bridge signing is dealt with in Chapter 4, paras 7.16 to 7.19). Road markings, together with appropriate warning signs,can be used in the case of arch bridges to guide higher vehicles to the centre of the road, where the clearance may be greater than at the outside edges.

22.6 The HIGH VEHS marking (diagram 1024.1) is prescribed for use at arch bridges. High vehicles should be guided through the highest part of the arch using this marking and the arrow to diagram 1014, together with edge of carriageway markings to diagram 1010. These should be aligned with the chord marking on the bridge (diagram 532.2) which indicates the available headroom in the central part of the road...

Note: the current chapter 5 is dated 2003, so its references to chapter 4 are out to date - that is now the 2013 edition.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #476 on: November 03, 2018, 18:23:03 »

Good picture in this evening's Bristol Post, showing the state of electrification at Hatchet Road (just after Bristol Parkway):

Incidentally, I can't help noticing that this is another bridge where the height warning is given in US Customary units only - is there a pattern emerging here? https://goo.gl/maps/uEs1mQrrHaC2
Streetview shows that there are advance signs in both metric and imperialunits on the approach, and also instructions to use the centre of the road.

Paul

For arch bridges the meaning of "advance" is a bit puzzling, since they are doing two things. At the bridge, the main concern is getting vehicles into the right bit of the road. At the last turning, or in advance, the concern is to prevent overheight vehicles going that way and diverting them. So the inserts within advance direction signs are the same as other low bridges, while the markings and the "final warning sign" (use middle of road) are specific to arches. But then, for some reason, single triangular signs at the last turning (with no "route avoiding" message) or further away have a little arch in them. Since that last turn can be miles back (needing a distance label) or right up close (as in Hatchet Lane), they may or may not be "in advance". Anyway, what I meant was something at least half a mile away.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #477 on: November 03, 2018, 18:56:35 »

Good picture in this evening's Bristol Post, showing the state of electrification at Hatchet Road (just after Bristol Parkway):

Incidentally, I can't help noticing that this is another bridge where the height warning is given in US Customary units only - is there a pattern emerging here? https://goo.gl/maps/uEs1mQrrHaC2
Streetview shows that there are advance signs in both metric and imperialunits on the approach, and also instructions to use the centre of the road.

Paul

Yes, the advanced signs use both sets of units, but the warnings on the bridge itself are in USCS only. Overall, it could be clearer.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2257


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #478 on: November 03, 2018, 20:32:04 »

Good picture in this evening's Bristol Post, showing the state of electrification at Hatchet Road (just after Bristol Parkway):

Incidentally, I can't help noticing that this is another bridge where the height warning is given in US Customary units only - is there a pattern emerging here? https://goo.gl/maps/uEs1mQrrHaC2
Streetview shows that there are advance signs in both metric and imperialunits on the approach, and also instructions to use the centre of the road.

Paul

Yes, the advanced signs use both sets of units, but the warnings on the bridge itself are in USCS only. Overall, it could be clearer.

Is it just me or did the footage remind anyone else of the double decker bus in Live and Let Die?
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #479 on: November 03, 2018, 20:54:03 »

There doesn't seem to be any simple way of finding out where signs are mandatory, but the form they should take if present is prescribed (the word used) in The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016. The Traffic Signs Manual generally repeats this in something resembling comprehensible English (which the TSRGD 2016 are not), but are all older than 2016 so may no longer be correct.

In the case of units on bridge signage, I found a Sunday Times report that a 2014 DfT» (Department for Transport - about) consultation proposed making dual units compulsory on new signs but let old ones stay. That's consistent with the 2013 TSM (Track Section Manager) saying metric is optional, and the TSRGD 2016 only showing the signs with both - but I wouldn't put it any stronger than that. Distances (along the road) are of course still to be given in miles.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 78
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page