Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 22:15 28 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:30 Shalford to Reading
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
22:10 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 22:34:23 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[104] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[103] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[78] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[56] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Return of the BRUTE?
[25] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 50 51 [52] 53 54 ... 78
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion  (Read 283440 times)
Western Pathfinder
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1528



View Profile
« Reply #765 on: March 21, 2019, 19:00:26 »

Had HST (High Speed Train) as Traction both ways between Bri and Tau yesterday Xcountry both ways.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #766 on: April 03, 2019, 12:15:46 »

Sunday sees the section between Wootton Bassett and just east of Chippenham (93m 31c) energised, with a view towards passenger authorisation at the end of the month.  This includes the 1 in 100 Dauntsey Bank which IETs (Intercity Express Train) on electric should fly up! 

A shame Chippenham station itself isn’t included as that would probably save a further minute for departing IET trains to London, but the difference should still be felt.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #767 on: April 06, 2019, 11:22:00 »

Sunday sees the section between Wootton Bassett and just east of Chippenham (93m 31c) energised, with a view towards passenger authorisation at the end of the month.  This includes the 1 in 100 Dauntsey Bank which IETs (Intercity Express Train) on electric should fly up! 

A shame Chippenham station itself isn’t included as that would probably save a further minute for departing IET trains to London, but the difference should still be felt.

Given that DfT» (Department for Transport - about) have approved a bit more electrification on the MML» (Midland Main Line. - about) there is potential for more parts of the GWML (Great Western Main Line) although I expect the Oxford "branch" to be done first.  Going past 93m 31c and through to Temple Meads is dependent on resolving the issues through Bath and the bridge at Chippenham
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #768 on: April 06, 2019, 12:31:56 »

Given that DfT» (Department for Transport - about) have approved a bit more electrification on the MML» (Midland Main Line. - about) there is potential for more parts of the GWML (Great Western Main Line) although I expect the Oxford "branch" to be done first.  Going past 93m 31c and through to Temple Meads is dependent on resolving the issues through Bath and the bridge at Chippenham

A quick google suggests that the difference in all-up mass between a full-length all-electric IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) train and a bi-mode is 23 tonnes. I wonder how far an electric train fitted with 23 tonnes of batteries could get?

You should be able to store well over 100 W-h/kg, so even if you could only have 15 tonnes of battery (assuming other kit would be needed to run them) you ought to be able to store at least 1.5MW-h, or - it I've understood this thread properly -  enough to keep a train (OK, a Pendolino - but close enough I hope) going at full pelt for about 15mins. Just a thought...
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Celestial
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 674


View Profile
« Reply #769 on: April 06, 2019, 19:42:14 »

15 mins doesn't sound like much compared to the flexibility that having the diesels brings, especially if you have to turn around and get the train back under the wires again.  That wouldn't even do Bristol Parkway to Temple Meads and back.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #770 on: April 06, 2019, 20:52:44 »

True but OTOH (On The Other Hand) it wouldn't be going "full pelt" on that stretch, so presumably the batteries should last correspondingly longer (or a bit more, cos of V2 and all that).
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Celestial
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 674


View Profile
« Reply #771 on: April 06, 2019, 21:33:03 »

Maybe, but if they couldn't get to Swansea, Weston, Cheltenham or wherever then I'm not sure of the advantage. I think the original plan was to have some pure electrics when Bristol and Swansea were going to be electrified? That would have made sense, but to take out the diesels and replace with less flexible batteries now would seem to be spending a lot of money to reduce the capability of the trains. 
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #772 on: April 06, 2019, 23:11:46 »

15 mins doesn't sound like much compared to the flexibility that having the diesels brings, especially if you have to turn around and get the train back under the wires again.  That wouldn't even do Bristol Parkway to Temple Meads and back.

It would get them all the way through Bath with a decent margin, and all the way through Chippenham. Most of the rest of the route could be wired without upsetting anyone...
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #773 on: April 06, 2019, 23:27:54 »

15 mins doesn't sound like much compared to the flexibility that having the diesels brings, especially if you have to turn around and get the train back under the wires again.  That wouldn't even do Bristol Parkway to Temple Meads and back.

It would get them all the way through Bath with a decent margin, and all the way through Chippenham. Most of the rest of the route could be wired without upsetting anyone...

Now what has happened to that idea of wiring up the cheaper and more straightforward sections to slingshot the trains with a boost of electricity ... talk was some of the stiff climbs on the Devon banks, but how about Batheaston to Thingley where we've had gawd knows how many closure weeks and money spent on lower the track through the tunnels for the electrics!    I suspect Oldfield Park to Keynsham might be possible too - not sure how easily that would plug into the local mains.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Adrian
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 171


View Profile
« Reply #774 on: April 07, 2019, 08:46:55 »

15 mins doesn't sound like much compared to the flexibility that having the diesels brings, especially if you have to turn around and get the train back under the wires again.  That wouldn't even do Bristol Parkway to Temple Meads and back.

It would get them all the way through Bath with a decent margin, and all the way through Chippenham. Most of the rest of the route could be wired without upsetting anyone...

Now what has happened to that idea of wiring up the cheaper and more straightforward sections to slingshot the trains with a boost of electricity ... talk was some of the stiff climbs on the Devon banks, but how about Batheaston to Thingley where we've had gawd knows how many closure weeks and money spent on lower the track through the tunnels for the electrics!    I suspect Oldfield Park to Keynsham might be possible too - not sure how easily that would plug into the local mains.


I think there is most 'network benefit' in getting Bristol Temple Meads to Bristol Parkway electrified first (as it will also allow Cardiff to Bristol local services to go electric), followed by Temple Meads to Bath, then fill in the gap between Bath and Chippenham last.

As for battery electric trains, surely it is the Thames Valley branches where this is most readily applicable?  Do the trains spend long enough under the wires at the respective mainline stations to recharge for a round trip?  For the Windsor branch it is perhaps more realistic than Marlow, but presumably it doesn't actually cost much to string up the wires the short distance from Slough to Windsor?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #775 on: April 07, 2019, 10:12:59 »

Do the trains spend long enough under the wires at the respective mainline stations to recharge for a round trip?

As it currently stands, only the Marlow service spends any time under the wires at all - generally around 10 minutes each hour at Maidenhead, though it can be less than half of that in the peak hours.  The other stations at West Ealing, Slough and Twyford don't currently have any overhead wires on the bay platforms the trains use.  That's not to say short sections couldn't be added though of course.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Adrian
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 171


View Profile
« Reply #776 on: April 07, 2019, 20:47:50 »

Do the trains spend long enough under the wires at the respective mainline stations to recharge for a round trip?

As it currently stands, only the Marlow service spends any time under the wires at all - generally around 10 minutes each hour at Maidenhead, though it can be less than half of that in the peak hours.  The other stations at West Ealing, Slough and Twyford don't currently have any overhead wires on the bay platforms the trains use.  That's not to say short sections couldn't be added though of course.

Seems surprising that they haven't wired everything in the vicinity of those stations (and might actually be useful) when in other places they are electrifying bits of line which will probably never see an electric train.  For instance, not just platforms 1 and 2 at Severn Tunnel Junction and a couple of hundred metres beyond, but also the freight line that bypasses those platforms.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #777 on: April 08, 2019, 10:14:24 »

There's usually some kind of reasoning behind it.  In the case of Severn Tunnel Junction then Platform 2 can be explained as it is sensible policy to wire a couple of hundred metres of diverging routes to prevent an electric train being wrong routed and subsequently stranded.  However, that logic isn't so easy to apply to Platforms 1 and the 'Down Relief' line that goes behind the station.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #778 on: April 09, 2019, 14:57:58 »

Sunday sees the section between Wootton Bassett and just east of Chippenham (93m 31c) energised, with a view towards passenger authorisation at the end of the month. 

Sunday 21st April is the date for passenger authorisation according to a post on another forum.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #779 on: April 09, 2019, 18:46:55 »

Sunday sees the section between Wootton Bassett and just east of Chippenham (93m 31c) energised, with a view towards passenger authorisation at the end of the month.  This includes the 1 in 100 Dauntsey Bank which IETs (Intercity Express Train) on electric should fly up! 

A shame Chippenham station itself isn’t included as that would probably save a further minute for departing IET trains to London, but the difference should still be felt.

The chief elements left out in my view are the Box and Middle Hill tunnels, just 5 miles further on; 3410 yards of mostly 1/100 with minimal ventilation for all those diesel fumes. I wonder whether that has been risk-assessed?

The terrain is quite flat and  undemanding from then on. 

OTC
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 50 51 [52] 53 54 ... 78
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page