Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 28 Mar 2024
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:23 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:20 Reading to Shalford
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
21:30 Shalford to Reading
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:17 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 19:40 Redhill to Reading
19:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 20:28:10 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[118] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[116] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[89] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Return of the BRUTE?
[38] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[28] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29] 30 31 ... 139
  Print  
Author Topic: Shortage of train crews on Great Western Railway since September 2017 - ongoing discussion  (Read 424468 times)
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #420 on: February 17, 2018, 11:30:38 »

Regarding post #402, linked to above, I find the statement that I quote below,

 "The levels of staffing is specified by the DfT» (Department for Transport - about).  The level of staffing has been met.  The DfT/TFL (Transport for London) paid for GWR (Great Western Railway) to recruit and train a specified number of drivers.  This was also met."

To be very surprising indeed, as I was not aware that the DfT specified staffing levels. If the O/P is correct in this, then does that mean that GWR are in fact doing OK by DfT standards and that we should accept the present level of cancellations as being the "new normal" ?


Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #421 on: February 17, 2018, 11:31:29 »

Yes there is it is as a-driver says further up this thread http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=18719.msg231525#msg231525
I suggest you go tell those whose journeys have been messed up this past half term and this weekend and long before under the stewardship of Firstgroup. People are tired of excuses, they just want to get what they pay good money for.

Delays and cancellations happen in any form of transportation but this is about a failure to provide an adequate resource in the form of providing enough staff to run the advertised service. This has been going on for years yet the fares go up every year along with promises that things will get better for you handing over even more money.

I respect your unwavering defence of GWR (Great Western Railway) ellendune but there are some high up management in GWR who are paid a lot of money to preside over a service that lets passengers down time and time again. Where’s the accountability from these managers?
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #422 on: February 17, 2018, 13:32:52 »

Yes there is it is as a-driver says further up this thread http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=18719.msg231525#msg231525
I suggest you go tell those whose journeys have been messed up this past half term and this weekend and long before under the stewardship of Firstgroup. People are tired of excuses, they just want to get what they pay good money for.

Delays and cancellations happen in any form of transportation but this is about a failure to provide an adequate resource in the form of providing enough staff to run the advertised service. This has been going on for years yet the fares go up every year along with promises that things will get better for you handing over even more money.

I respect your unwavering defence of GWR (Great Western Railway) ellendune but there are some high up management in GWR who are paid a lot of money to preside over a service that lets passengers down time and time again. Where’s the accountability from these managers?

IMO (in my opinion) GWR are being paid to take the flak for the failure of DfT» (Department for Transport - about) and NR» (Network Rail - home page).  What is worse they can do absolutely nothing about it!  So who's stewardship is it?

You can criticise them for not providing enough information and for their appalling response times to letters of complaint or any of those other things, but the one thing they can do nothing about at the moment is provide a more reliable train service until:

a) The new trains ordered by DfT work reliably.
b) they are given enough time with enough new infrastructure to retrain their existing drivers to work the new trains.

DfT knew this was going to be bad - that is why GWR were given a direct award. 

Of course GWR could launch a PR (Public Relations) campaign to explain exactly what the problem is and why it will take time to solve, but that might be seen as a career limiting manoeuvre by those people at Great Minster House.  Though I suspect they can't be that choosy or they will run out of anyone willing to bid. 

Logged
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1450



View Profile
« Reply #423 on: February 17, 2018, 14:17:05 »

I find it curious that SWR» (South Western Railway - about), with four days of strike action taking place, can run a full service with fewer cancellations than GWR (Great Western Railway) on a ‘normal’ day.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #424 on: February 17, 2018, 14:25:40 »

"until the new trains ordered by DfT» (Department for Transport - about) work reliably"

Do I surmise from the above quote that the new trains are NOT working reliably ? I thought that the general view was that they are splendid and that only a few naysayers and old dinosaurs like me dared to express doubts about reliability.

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #425 on: February 17, 2018, 16:43:23 »

Did you express doubts about reliability prior to introduction?

I thought it was the subjective issues of seat comfort/alignment and catering that were your bête noire.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #426 on: February 17, 2018, 17:37:49 »

Yes, I did.
Can not find the post in order to quote it, but I said something like "Diesel engines and electric drives are mature technologies and should hopefully work reasonably reliably. The problems IMHO (in my humble opinion) are likely to be with computers and software. Unlike mechanical components, software is NEVER a mature technology, "if it works it must be obsolete"
The new DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) are likely to contain a large number of computer systems, all of which have to work together, first time every time"

In other posts I also expressed doubts as to electrification being completed on time, and about the reliability of the electrification equipment. I specifically forecast that a single pigeon could cause widespread disruption.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 965


View Profile
« Reply #427 on: February 17, 2018, 19:19:34 »

Hitachi as proven software on the Cl. 395’s but the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) didn’t want that. They wanted a different unproven system, and guess what?!
Logged
mjones
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 408


View Profile
« Reply #428 on: February 17, 2018, 19:32:49 »

There can be no defence for GWR (Great Western Railway) having to cancel so many IC (Inter City) services today particularly to/from South Wales where the service is just hourly coupled with those travelling from Swansea and Cardiff having to get a bus to Newport owing to engineering work.

..


Especially when those buses fail to meet the timetabled connecting service, and the following one is cancelled, as I've just experienced.

The bus operation seemed quite disorganised, with slow loading at Cardiff, and then being dropped off on a busy road outside Newport station with no proper signposting, so a lot of passengers were confused about which direction to head in, and nowhere safe to cross the road.
..
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #429 on: February 17, 2018, 19:50:19 »

Hitachi as proven software on the Cl. 395’s but the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) didn’t want that. They wanted a different unproven system, and guess what?!

That proves it!
Logged

Now, please!
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #430 on: February 17, 2018, 20:11:16 »

Hitachi as proven software on the Cl. 395’s but the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) didn’t want that. They wanted a different unproven system, and guess what?!

It's a very different train, so it needs quite different software. A bit like the driver for a bit of PC hardware, and not one where there's a standard interface/protocol.

Within that, there should be a lot of reuse of software components, especially of the same team were involved. I would expect (and hope) that the software is now the responsibility of the UK (United Kingdom)-based team, in which case it would have been transferred at some stage. That can be tricky...
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #431 on: February 17, 2018, 21:54:53 »

Yes there is it is as a-driver says further up this thread http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=18719.msg231525#msg231525
I suggest you go tell those whose journeys have been messed up this past half term and this weekend and long before under the stewardship of Firstgroup. People are tired of excuses, they just want to get what they pay good money for.

Delays and cancellations happen in any form of transportation but this is about a failure to provide an adequate resource in the form of providing enough staff to run the advertised service. This has been going on for years yet the fares go up every year along with promises that things will get better for you handing over even more money.

I respect your unwavering defence of GWR (Great Western Railway) ellendune but there are some high up management in GWR who are paid a lot of money to preside over a service that lets passengers down time and time again. Where’s the accountability from these managers?

IMO (in my opinion) GWR are being paid to take the flak for the failure of DfT» (Department for Transport - about) and NR» (Network Rail - home page).  What is worse they can do absolutely nothing about it!  So who's stewardship is it?

You can criticise them for not providing enough information and for their appalling response times to letters of complaint or any of those other things, but the one thing they can do nothing about at the moment is provide a more reliable train service until:

a) The new trains ordered by DfT work reliably.
b) they are given enough time with enough new infrastructure to retrain their existing drivers to work the new trains.

DfT knew this was going to be bad - that is why GWR were given a direct award. 

Of course GWR could launch a PR (Public Relations) campaign to explain exactly what the problem is and why it will take time to solve, but that might be seen as a career limiting manoeuvre by those people at Great Minster House.  Though I suspect they can't be that choosy or they will run out of anyone willing to bid. 



Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #432 on: February 17, 2018, 22:00:29 »

You clearly weren't a passenger on Virgin WC (Wiltshire Council (Unitary Authority)) when they were being criticised during the rebuilding of the WCML (West Coast Main Line)  Or perhaps you were putting forward the same blame the TOC (Train Operating Company) for everything view. This is just history repeating itself. 

GWR (Great Western Railway) are far from perfect in many ways but blaming them for things outside their control is not going to help anyone.  If you think any other operator (private or - dare I say it - public) would be able to run any better service in these circumstances then you are mistaken.

This continued criticism further demoralises staff so that they are less likely to turn out when they do not need to and strengthening the power of the most militant in the unions. II makes an interesting point about the intervention of the Unions to stop some incentives to work additional hours. But GWR are also trying to negotiate with the same unions on use of the new stock.  et that wrong and you could be having to find other ways to travel like they did in Southern. 

With the benefit of hindsight GWR should have refused a franchise extension and left DfT» (Department for Transport - about) to take it on themselves.  The train service would be no better but DfT would have nowhere to hide.  Our railways are run by real people not robots. 

If you have ever been in a position where you were being blamed for not being able do something that is totally outside your control then you should understand the effect of your criticism. 

« Last Edit: February 17, 2018, 22:19:30 by ellendune » Logged
eXPassenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 547


View Profile
« Reply #433 on: February 17, 2018, 22:51:58 »

You clearly weren't a passenger on Virgin WC (Wiltshire Council (Unitary Authority)) when they were being criticised during the rebuilding of the WCML (West Coast Main Line)  Or perhaps you were putting forward the same blame the TOC (Train Operating Company) for everything view. This is just history repeating itself. 

GWR (Great Western Railway) are far from perfect in many ways but blaming them for things outside their control is not going to help anyone.  If you think any other operator (private or - dare I say it - public) would be able to run any better service in these circumstances then you are mistaken.

This continued criticism further demoralises staff so that they are less likely to turn out when they do not need to and strengthening the power of the most militant in the unions. II makes an interesting point about the intervention of the Unions to stop some incentives to work additional hours. But GWR are also trying to negotiate with the same unions on use of the new stock.  et that wrong and you could be having to find other ways to travel like they did in Southern. 

With the benefit of hindsight GWR should have refused a franchise extension and left DfT» (Department for Transport - about) to take it on themselves.  The train service would be no better but DfT would have nowhere to hide.  Our railways are run by real people not robots. 

If you have ever been in a position where you were being blamed for not being able do something that is totally outside your control then you should understand the effect of your criticism. 



Sorry.  I understand where you are coming from but if you are aware that things will go pear shaped you should do the following in advance:

- Beef up your customer service team and make them highly responsive
- Do not launch a major advertising campaign when you know you will have problems delivering the expectations you have raised
- Set up contingency plans.  In this case planned contracted road transport that can quickly slot into place.
- Agree with your sponsor that you will explain the problems, apologise for them and make OTT (Open Train Times website) payments in compensation

If you have done this then you can genuinely claim that you foresaw the problem and planned to mitigate the issues.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #434 on: February 17, 2018, 23:01:31 »

eXPassenger, well said.

It beggars belief that some are trying to defend the indefensible.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29] 30 31 ... 139
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page