Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:35 29 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:08 Newbury to Bedwyn
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
10:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:41 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 09:39:01 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[64] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[59] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[58] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[52] Return of the BRUTE?
[36] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 111 112 [113] 114 115 ... 170
  Print  
Author Topic: IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent performance issues  (Read 544107 times)
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #1680 on: June 01, 2019, 17:10:17 »

I wonder what has happened to this "essential requirement" ? I presume that Hitachi have found some wiggle room whereby the failure to couple reliably is now a customer problem and not a supplier problem.
Well if it’s due to the state of the track being uneven in the station then yes.

True.
Does anyone know what the problem is ?
If defective track, then network should get a move on and rectify it.
If defective trains, then hitachi should make them work.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #1681 on: June 01, 2019, 17:48:39 »

Does anyone know what the problem is ?
If defective track, then network should get a move on and rectify it.
If defective trains, then hitachi should make them work.

As I recall, Hitachi did all their tests (with their staff) and reckoned the coupling performance was within spec, but when done during operations by GWR (Great Western Railway) staff it has been a problem. The couplers themselves are made by Dellner, and assuming they are standard items it is unlikely they are the issue. Coupling trains automatically, even on sharp curves and uneven track, is hardly an unfamiliar task.

But that leaves the rest of the train's systems, GWR's staff training, and the effects of running in service on the train/coupler hardware. I've not heard whether an agreed conclusion has been reached - but obviously that "agreed" can pose problems in a case like this. Note that the nature of the supply contract is not big factor here; it's pretty much a "normal" manufacturer/customer issue.

Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #1682 on: June 01, 2019, 19:11:28 »

According to an Industry Insider on the WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) Forum (no, not our one), the coupling problem is being caused by the electrical connector jamming half way in its housing when being deployed.  So, very much an HITACHI problem.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #1683 on: June 01, 2019, 19:33:06 »

For several reasons, I strongly suspect that the hitachi trains are at fault.

1) I doubt that the track is at fault, or network rail would hopefully have fixed it by now.
2) I doubt that GWR (Great Western Railway) operating staff are at fault since they are generally well trained for a demanding and safety critical role. Coupling trains via a largely automatic system sounds simpler than driving, and should be well within the capabilities of anyone whom can safely drive a train.
3) The general build quality and reliability seems poor, note the ongoing toilet and reservation system faults.

And finally the preceding post suggests that this is a supplier problem.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #1684 on: June 02, 2019, 09:22:35 »

It’s a combination of all three.  The track at certain locations (Swansea is one, certain platforms at Plymouth another) needs looking at. Similar problems have now largely been resolved with the 387 fleet that were regularly occurring at Reading so these issues can be resolved.

It is true that the train itself sometimes doesn’t want to play ball. 

And finally drivers are still learning the (convoluted) official coupling procedure and many have yet to couple /uncouple since they passed out as competent many months ago (in some cases years), so experience level is low for many.

All of which should get better over the coming months, and will need to to get better by December when coupling/uncoupling becomes much more regular.  That’s one of the biggest risks to a successful delivery of the new timetable IMHO (in my humble opinion).

Oh, and reservations have been working on all the trains I’ve been on in the last three weeks, so that issue (which largely affected the 9-car units) has improved a great deal.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
WelshBluebird
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 158


View Profile Email
« Reply #1685 on: June 03, 2019, 15:34:54 »

GWR (Great Western Railway) have done coupling and decoupling in service for years though, even at places like Temple Meads where the platforms have severe curves.
If it hasn't been an issue before, and only is now an issue on the new trains, then surely the trains are the issue?
If the procedure is convoluted then surely that is a Hitachi problem?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #1686 on: June 03, 2019, 16:22:26 »

Modern coupling systems seem more rigid than previous ones - hence all the problems with the 387s I mentioned.  To prevent damage I guess?  Track work to make sure there a no dips at the coupling points thereby making sure the couplers are vertically aligned can usually solve problems, though it may continue to be an issue where there is a lot of curvature.

The coupling procedure (as agreed by Hitachi and GWR (Great Western Railway)) is far more convoluted than it needs to be and compared with other traction types.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7749



View Profile
« Reply #1687 on: June 03, 2019, 18:46:03 »

Worth remembering as the blame is shifted between GWR (Great Western Railway) & Hitachi that this is first and foremost a problem for customers, and try not to lose sight of the impact on them as a consequence of shortforms etc.
Logged
rower40
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 292

Turning signalling into a video game since 1988.


View Profile
« Reply #1688 on: June 04, 2019, 13:44:51 »

First - apologies if this issue has been raised somewhere in the preceding 113 pages.  A simple search for "flicker" didn't come up with anything on this thread.

Last-but-one Saturday was my first encounter with (ordeal on?) an IET (Intercity Express Train).  I found the LED customer information display very hard to look at, as its refresh rate made it flicker when in my peripheral vision, but was almost steady when I looked straight at it.  As it's most of the width of the ceiling, if I looked straight at the left-hand edge of the display, the right-hand side flickered, and vice versa.

Why can't the display be configured to flash at (say) 10 kHz (so that it appears steady), rather than 50 Hz?  It's not being fed off mains!

I've written to GWR (Great Western Railway) advising that this is detrimental to health - certainly for those prone to migraines or photo-sensitive epilepsy.  After all, we get warnings on the TV news that "this report contains flash photography" - these displays are (to me) far more hazardous than watching sporadic flashes off the TV.  I wonder whether they'll take any notice or action.

Has anyone else noticed this?  (If it appears somewhere upthread - apologies again and can someone provide a link?  Thanks!)

Logged
jamestheredengine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 301


View Profile
« Reply #1689 on: June 05, 2019, 07:29:43 »

Last night's episode in the continuing 1B46 (1648 Cardiff to Swansea) trolley debacle. Got on in coach J, to be in the same half of the lousy 5+5 formation as the guard, despite its being the wrong end for the exit at Neath. Asked the guard directly, "Is there a trolley on this train?" Was assured that there was and that it would be through shortly. Must have been one of those invisible trolleys. Either that or standards have now fallen so low that GWR (Great Western Railway) guards now lie to customers.
Logged

CMRail
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 400


View Profile
« Reply #1690 on: June 05, 2019, 16:44:49 »

Last night's episode in the continuing 1B46 (1648 Cardiff to Swansea) trolley debacle. Got on in coach J, to be in the same half of the lousy 5+5 formation as the guard, despite its being the wrong end for the exit at Neath. Asked the guard directly, "Is there a trolley on this train?" Was assured that there was and that it would be through shortly. Must have been one of those invisible trolleys. Either that or standards have now fallen so low that GWR (Great Western Railway) guards now lie to customers.

There are many reasons other than the guard why the Train Manager told you it was coming through. He/she aren’t directly related to the catering crew and they mainly join/leave at different points on the route. Possibly, the trolley had been a stationary one and the words quietest PA (Public Address) on the 800s was inaudible. I highly doubt that the TM(resolve) lied to you deliberately.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18895



View Profile
« Reply #1691 on: June 05, 2019, 16:59:07 »

A good Train Manager should be fully aware of the staff he has aboard his train. In an emergency he may well need their assistance.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #1692 on: June 05, 2019, 17:34:15 »

I also doubt that the train manager deliberately lied.
It seems possible that has was unaware that the trolley had just hidden, or was about to hide.
Better get used to it, all part of the great downgrade.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #1693 on: June 06, 2019, 06:28:17 »

A few 5 vice 9 IET (Intercity Express Train) services for the morning peak again this morning. Now Hitachi now have the full fleet to draw on, what assurance can be given that they can supply the number required once the much enhanced timetable starts in December when this is still happening on the existing timetable?
Logged
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1145


View Profile Email
« Reply #1694 on: June 06, 2019, 09:01:56 »

Quote from: Timmer
A few 5 vice 9 IET (Intercity Express Train) services for the morning peak again this morning. Now Hitachi now have the full fleet to draw on, what assurance can be given that they can supply the number required once the much enhanced timetable starts in December when this is still happening on the existing timetable?

Not only today, of course.

As many know, yesterday there was a failed freight train blocking one line between Bath and Bathampton, which resulted in alternate Bristol to London and vice versa services running via Badminton. Therefore only an hourly service was being provided to Chippenham and Bath.

I went down to Bristol for the monthly Retired Railway Staff gathering on the 1030 ex-Paddington to WSM, 1143 from CPM» (Chippenham - next trains). The trains before and after it were diverted (so to all intents and purposes cancelled as far as local passengers were concerned), and this one turned up short-formed with a 5-car set.

Whilst I am aware of, and had experience of, severe overcrowding on trains in the peak, one does not really expect to find a full and standing train at 1143 on a Wednesday morning...

Just to add insult to injury, between Bath and Bristol this train, that was bound for WSM, had an automated announcement running telling passengers that the train would be terminating at Bristol.

GWR (Great Western Railway) can clearly not be held responsible for a freight locomotive failing. They can be held responsible, however, for short-forming a train on a service that was already suffering a 50% cancellation rate at the time, and also the automated announcement system which appears to be uncontrollable by anybody on board.

This is not the level of customer service that passengers expect and deserve in 2019.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 111 112 [113] 114 115 ... 170
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page