Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:35 28 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 23:53:57 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[98] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[97] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[86] Return of the BRUTE?
[74] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[23] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 170
  Print  
Author Topic: IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent performance issues  (Read 543953 times)
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #360 on: March 10, 2018, 11:41:55 »

Just watched the 07:59 from Swansea, a 10-car IET (Intercity Express Train), arrive at Paddington with the rear 5 locked out of use.  The front half looked wedges to the rafters.  The locked out train was then unlocked at Paddington so all 10 were in service as it boarded for the 11:30 to Bristol.  After most passengers had settled those on the rear five were then turfed off minutes before departure as the back 5 were then hastily locked out of use.  Front five wedged again and a 10 minute late departure due to sorting the resulting mess out.

If this sort of nonsense isn’t sorted by the summer then I dread to think how we’ll cope.  Utterly pathetic!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #361 on: March 10, 2018, 11:55:57 »

Just watched the 07:59 from Swansea, a 10-car IET (Intercity Express Train), arrive at Paddington with the rear 5 locked out of use.  The front half looked wedges to the rafters.  The locked out train was then unlocked at Paddington so all 10 were in service as it boarded for the 11:30 to Bristol.  After most passengers had settled those on the rear five were then turfed off minutes before departure as the back 5 were then hastily locked out of use.  Front five wedged again and a 10 minute late departure due to sorting the resulting mess out.

If this sort of nonsense isn’t sorted by the summer then I dread to think how we’ll cope.  Utterly pathetic!

And on the way back ... or is that a different train doing the same thing??

Quote
13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington due 14:41
Facilities on the 13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington due 14:41.
This is due to a shortage of on train staff.
Additional Facilities Information
Only the front 5 coaches will be in use on this service today.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #362 on: March 10, 2018, 11:57:00 »

I recall a promise that all of the busiest trains in and out of Paddington would be 9 or 10 carriages - none of them would be just 5.   Were we promised all 9 or 10 carriages in use?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #363 on: March 10, 2018, 11:57:36 »

Just watched the 07:59 from Swansea, a 10-car IET (Intercity Express Train), arrive at Paddington with the rear 5 locked out of use.  The front half looked wedges to the rafters.  The locked out train was then unlocked at Paddington so all 10 were in service as it boarded for the 11:30 to Bristol.  After most passengers had settled those on the rear five were then turfed off minutes before departure as the back 5 were then hastily locked out of use.  Front five wedged again and a 10 minute late departure due to sorting the resulting mess out.

If this sort of nonsense isn’t sorted by the summer then I dread to think how we’ll cope.  Utterly pathetic!
There’s quite a few 10 down to 5 IETs listed on JC today. The sooner the 9 car IETs arrive the better. GWR (Great Western Railway) are struggling to provide crew for one train so it’s no surprise they can’t provide two sets of crew for these 2 x 5 trains. Why not have built the 9 car sets first?

All that’s happened is a new problem has been created of trains running with no passengers. Hardly the image protrayed on the famous 5 adverts is it?
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #364 on: March 10, 2018, 12:00:46 »

Just watched the 07:59 from Swansea, a 10-car IET (Intercity Express Train), arrive at Paddington with the rear 5 locked out of use.  The front half looked wedges to the rafters.  The locked out train was then unlocked at Paddington so all 10 were in service as it boarded for the 11:30 to Bristol.  After most passengers had settled those on the rear five were then turfed off minutes before departure as the back 5 were then hastily locked out of use.  Front five wedged again and a 10 minute late departure due to sorting the resulting mess out.

If this sort of nonsense isn’t sorted by the summer then I dread to think how we’ll cope.  Utterly pathetic!
There’s quite a few 10 down to 5 IETs listed on JC today. The sooner the 9 car IETs arrive the better. GWR (Great Western Railway) are struggling to provide crew for one train so it’s no surprise they can’t provide two sets of crew for these 2 x 5 trains. Why not have built the 9 car sets first?

International rugby at Cardiff tomorrow and this combined with the usual lack of staff on a Sunday could prove very embarrassing for GWR if they've got nothing arranged........accepting of course that they are immune to embarrassment.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #365 on: March 10, 2018, 12:35:10 »

All that’s happened is a new problem has been created of trains running with no passengers. Hardly the image protrayed on the famous 5 adverts is it?

Perhaps an idea for 1st April
... 5 car train will be carriages A, D, G, J and T for Anne, Dick, George(ina), Julian and Timmy
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #366 on: March 10, 2018, 12:47:11 »

International rugby at Cardiff tomorrow and this combined with the usual lack of staff on a Sunday could prove very embarrassing for GWR (Great Western Railway) if they've got nothing arranged........accepting of course that they are immune to embarrassment.

But they have, if you believe notices. When at Bristol Parkway yesterday afternoon there was a prominent notice advising of two extra services to the Rugby International but, mind you, I didn;t read the notice just noticed it so it could be a motley collection of assorted sprinters cobbled together running from BTM (Bristol Temple Meads (strictly, it should be BRI)) and BPW» (Bristol Parkway - next trains) only. Have to have a look at RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) later.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #367 on: March 10, 2018, 13:23:17 »

International rugby at Cardiff tomorrow...

Are you sure this time?  Tongue
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #368 on: March 10, 2018, 13:50:28 »

It may seem obvious, but one of the key tasks for a TOC (Train Operating Company) is to recruit, train and retain enough traincrew to run the service they plan to operate.  Clearly GWR (Great Western Railway) are failing miserably on this. 

In my day (and I think this goes for a few of us who post here) cancelling trains because of a shortage of traincrew was almost unheard of, even through the periods of training for HSTs (High Speed Train) and Turbos for example.  Why does GWR find the management of traincrew so difficult? 
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #369 on: March 10, 2018, 19:50:00 »

It may seem obvious, but one of the key tasks for a TOC (Train Operating Company) is to recruit, train and retain enough traincrew to run the service they plan to operate.  Clearly GWR (Great Western Railway) are failing miserably on this. 

In my day (and I think this goes for a few of us who post here) cancelling trains because of a shortage of traincrew was almost unheard of, even through the periods of training for HSTs (High Speed Train) and Turbos for example.  Why does GWR find the management of traincrew so difficult? 


Didn't someone say that the number of train crew was specified in the franchise?  If that is true then no one would plan on supplying more or they would not get the contract. There is also a limit to how many people can be trained to drive at once and rail companies are competing for a finite pool of drivers. Of course GWR could improve their chances by giving better terms and conditions, but many of this parish want to make them worse by making Sunday work mandatory so there and DfT» (Department for Transport - about) want DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) more the norm so there is a bit of a conflict here. 

It has been explained a number of times how knock on effects of the delays to electrification has compressed the the training on new (or cascaded) stock so that the number of drivers hours being taken up with training is much higher than could be planned - albeit over a shorter period.  It has also been reported that in some or even many cases, drivers are available, but they are not qualified for the stock being used.   

The DfT like other government departments is clear that it wants its contractors to cut costs to the absolute minimum without realising the lack of resilience that provides when things don't go to plan - in this case electrification delays and the consequent delays in cascading stock. 

This all sounds to me like a problem of people who think they can have their cake and eat it. But then that is government policy.

So then there is the matter of why GWR don't come out explain it all. 

To answer this we should perhaps consider who GWR's customers are.  Yes of course it's all of us! But we are what economists call inelastic customers, we are relatively unlikely to go elsewhere, because we have no alternative.

However, if you look at it another way their main client and the one most likely to take their business elsewhere is DfT since they could not operate the line without the franchise.  So if coming clean means you have to say its all the fault of your biggest customer who could mark you down for the next contract what do you do?
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #370 on: March 10, 2018, 20:23:55 »

It may seem obvious, but one of the key tasks for a TOC (Train Operating Company) is to recruit, train and retain enough traincrew to run the service they plan to operate.  Clearly GWR (Great Western Railway) are failing miserably on this. 

In my day (and I think this goes for a few of us who post here) cancelling trains because of a shortage of traincrew was almost unheard of, even through the periods of training for HSTs (High Speed Train) and Turbos for example.  Why does GWR find the management of traincrew so difficult? 


Didn't someone say that the number of train crew was specified in the franchise?  If that is true then no one would plan on supplying more or they would not get the contract. There is also a limit to how many people can be trained to drive at once and rail companies are competing for a finite pool of drivers. Of course GWR could improve their chances by giving better terms and conditions, but many of this parish want to make them worse by making Sunday work mandatory so there and DfT» (Department for Transport - about) want DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) more the norm so there is a bit of a conflict here. 

It has been explained a number of times how knock on effects of the delays to electrification has compressed the the training on new (or cascaded) stock so that the number of drivers hours being taken up with training is much higher than could be planned - albeit over a shorter period.  It has also been reported that in some or even many cases, drivers are available, but they are not qualified for the stock being used.   

The DfT like other government departments is clear that it wants its contractors to cut costs to the absolute minimum without realising the lack of resilience that provides when things don't go to plan - in this case electrification delays and the consequent delays in cascading stock. 

This all sounds to me like a problem of people who think they can have their cake and eat it. But then that is government policy.

So then there is the matter of why GWR don't come out explain it all. 

To answer this we should perhaps consider who GWR's customers are.  Yes of course it's all of us! But we are what economists call inelastic customers, we are relatively unlikely to go elsewhere, because we have no alternative.

However, if you look at it another way their main client and the one most likely to take their business elsewhere is DfT since they could not operate the line without the franchise.  So if coming clean means you have to say its all the fault of your biggest customer who could mark you down for the next contract what do you do?

.......and if you were in any doubt, you can now see that it really is possible to be that smug.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #371 on: March 10, 2018, 21:01:31 »

.......and if you were in any doubt, you can now see that it really is possible to be that smug.

I try and explain that the system stinks.  Are you suggest is that I am being smug?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #372 on: March 10, 2018, 21:38:13 »

.......and if you were in any doubt, you can now see that it really is possible to be that smug.

I try and explain that the system stinks.  Are you suggest is that I am being smug?

Describing a system doesn't indicate support for it - but can so easily misread as being its advocate.   However, there's a hugely useful function in describing a system if you want to understand it and improve it.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
eXPassenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 547


View Profile
« Reply #373 on: March 10, 2018, 22:34:50 »

I came down on the 17:00 (2 x 5) from Paddington to TM(resolve) today.  My first journey on an IET (Intercity Express Train) and I thought it went well.  I was happy with the seats, negligible diesel engine noise and the lower seat backs make the carriage far more open.

The 'catering trolley' appeared after Reading with an apology.  There was 1 trolley that had done the other 5 carriages before Reading.

Interestingly the boards at Paddington, RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) and the train displays stated we would stop at Didcot.  The guard announced at Reading that we would not and then took pleasure in telling the passengers to ignore the display and announcements as we were proceeding through Didcot at full speed.
Logged
mjones
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 408


View Profile
« Reply #374 on: March 14, 2018, 18:11:30 »

Another post on my why aren't IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) using electricity theme: I'm on the 1730 Pad to Taunton train today. Electric power to Reading, then they started the diesels. Why not switch at Didcot?
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 170
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page