Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:15 28 Mar 2024
- Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:26 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
15:10 Newquay to Par
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
17:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
14:05 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
13:57 Exmouth to Paignton
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 15:33:59 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 170
  Print  
Author Topic: IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent performance issues  (Read 543810 times)
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #405 on: April 07, 2018, 10:22:20 »

Half length IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) seem to be a regular event now, it is starting to look a bit like the voyager introduction.
9 car IETs (Intercity Express Train) can’t come soon enough.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #406 on: April 07, 2018, 12:21:15 »

Half length IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) seem to be a regular event now, it is starting to look a bit like the voyager introduction.
9 car IETs (Intercity Express Train) can’t come soon enough.

Yes indeed. Broadgage’s pessimistic outlook might indeed come to pass but I think it’s too early to make any assumptions until the 9-car sets are in use and the new timetable introduced next January.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #407 on: April 07, 2018, 13:34:03 »

Half length IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) seem to be a regular event now, it is starting to look a bit like the voyager introduction.
What never seems to have been made clear is the crew requirements.  If there’s a requirement for a second guard, train manager whatever, are they preempting a set locked out of use because there’s no one to operate it?

Paul
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #408 on: April 07, 2018, 13:42:20 »

What never seems to have been made clear is the crew requirements.  If there’s a requirement for a second guard, train manager whatever, are they preempting a set locked out of use because there’s no one to operate it?

There is a requirement for a competent safety-trained person in each separate gangwayed area of the 800 class 10 car trains (though not to operate the second set, I don't think), but there is not such a requirement where two 143s or 16x units are coupled.  That does not necessarily mean two train managers - ticket checkers are also "competent people" ... and at present more of them are riding trains rather than being on datelines, I believe. So that could be why there is very limited use (so far) of that new gateline at Chippenham, for example. 
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #409 on: April 07, 2018, 15:02:36 »

Was this requirement for double crewing of a 5+5 IET (Intercity Express Train) known when they were ordered ? Or is it a later requirement, presumably by the trade union.
A cynic like me might suspect that this double crewing requirement might be a good excuse to operate a single unit when two units might have been better.
"we would have liked to operate a double unit, and this is a future aspiration, but due to staffing and financial constraints, some services will be single units"
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #410 on: April 07, 2018, 16:25:01 »

Known when they were ordered I believe.  As Graham says, it just has to be somebody deemed ‘competent’, so Ticket Examiners are fine.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #411 on: April 08, 2018, 22:44:56 »

This has cropped up elsewhere: https://www.rmt.org.uk/news/members-updates/intercity-express-programme-iep050118/

Quote
INTERCITY EXPRESS PROGRAMME (IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.))
Our Ref:  HC/14/2

5 January 2018

Dear colleague

INTERCITY EXPRESS PROGRAMME (IEP)

I write to provide an update on the most recent discussions which have taken place between your union and Great Western Railway with regard to the Intercity Express Programme.

The company tabled proposals at a meeting of the On-Trains Divisional Council last month in relation to an interim arrangement for “Front-Set Lead” working. This matter arises from previous discussions at OTDC level which were aimed to utilise Catering Grades staff as “Front-Set Lead” on IET (Intercity Express Train) 10-car trains in place of the Ticket Examiners currently in position. As part of the package, the company proposed the following:

• Training competence as agreed • A full day training – half day classroom and half day on board to be undertaken by competent OBS managers or peer trainers • The Hosts will receive a £20 (and not 15%) flat payment for any day on which they undertake this role

Prior to the proposals being considered by your National Executive Committee, the following resolution was submitted by our Paddington No1 Branch:

“That this RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) Paddington No.1 branch notes your Circular No: IR/549/17 ‘Intercity Express Programme (IEP)’ (1st December 2017, REF HC/14/2) regarding the “temporary agreement and operational method” for GWR (Great Western Railway) Class 800 (IET) 10-car sets previously reported by this branch.

We note the RMT National Executive Committee decision (not numbered or dated) referred to in Circular No: IR/549/17 fails to respond to concerns of this branch. In particular, RMT Padding No.1 Branch called on the NEC» (National Exhibition Centre - about) to revoke the “temporary agreement and operational method” for class 800 trains, inform GWR no such agreement exists with this union, obtain a risk assessment for class 800 operation and provide immediate advice to RMT members (Train Managers, Ticket Examiners, Customer Service Hosts and Dispatch Staff) on what steps they should take to protect their safety in the event of being rostered to work Class 800 stock.

We further note that a further communication ‘working of 10 Car IET trains’ (unsigned and dated 29th November 2017) purportedly from RMT On-Trains Divisional  Council seeks to clarify the use of ‘IET Trained TE’ staff as competent persons to work Class 800 (IET) stock. The failure of the previous NEC decision on this matter to provide clear leadership to our members on the operation of Class 800 stock is facilitating GWR’s operation of non-gangway 10-car formation (2x5) Class 800 stock without a Guard in the front portion of the train. This is a breach of RMT’s policy.

This branch notes the meeting due to take place between our union and GWR at Director Level on Thursday 7th December 2017 on the introduction of IET trains. We call on the General Secretary and NEC to uphold this union’s policy that a Guard be rostered to work on each section of non-gangway Class 800 stock. In the event that GWR refuses to implement similar arrangements to those that have successfully operated with class 180 stock for many years, we call on the NEC to inform GWR that we are in dispute over the operation of class 800 stock and to ballot our affected members for industrial action.”

Your NEC has now considered the matter and noted both the situation which arose at the OTDC and the above resolution. Having consulted with the GWR members and their representatives, the NEC has instructed me to inform the company that the proposals are unacceptable.

Further, I have also been instructed to seek an urgent meeting with GWR to discuss our objections and to demand that the arrangements involving the 180 stock are applied to the operation of class 800 IET trains. Your Lead Officer is currently making the necessary arrangements to hold this meeting.

Additionally, the NEC has also instructed all branches with affected GWR members to arrange special meetings for our Guard, Catering and Ticket Examiner members to discuss this matter, so look out for details of such meetings from your branch.

I will of course write to you again with details of any further developments with regards to this situation, but I trust this keeps you advised of all recent matters for now.

Yours sincerely   Mick Cash General Secretary
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #412 on: April 09, 2018, 06:17:11 »

Is the reason why quite a number of IET (Intercity Express Train) scheduled services are running 5 rather than 10 with one set locked out of use?
Logged
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #413 on: April 09, 2018, 08:58:58 »

Is the reason why quite a number of IET (Intercity Express Train) scheduled services are running 5 rather than 10 with one set locked out of use?


Unable to crew the rear unit.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #414 on: April 09, 2018, 09:38:58 »

Is the reason why quite a number of IET (Intercity Express Train) scheduled services are running 5 rather than 10 with one set locked out of use?


Unable to crew the rear unit.

Is this due to crew shortages? If so, any idea why?

Surely GWR (Great Western Railway) knew how many crew would be needed?
Logged
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #415 on: April 09, 2018, 09:42:10 »

Is the reason why quite a number of IET (Intercity Express Train) scheduled services are running 5 rather than 10 with one set locked out of use?


Unable to crew the rear unit.

Is this due to crew shortages? If so, any idea why?

Surely GWR (Great Western Railway) knew how many crew would be needed?

GWR know crew are needed for all the cancelled trains that are listed in the traincrew shortage thread. Over to GWR Smiley Smiley
Logged
mjones
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 408


View Profile
« Reply #416 on: April 09, 2018, 12:04:58 »

And still lots of diesel running under the wires between London and Didcot. Saw another one pull out of PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) this morning with engines on, pantographs down. The suspicion grows that there are still technical problems with the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) that aren't being admitted to.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #417 on: April 09, 2018, 13:07:59 »

And still lots of diesel running under the wires between London and Didcot. Saw another one pull out of PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) this morning with engines on, pantographs down. The suspicion grows that there are still technical problems with the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) that aren't being admitted to.

ECS (Empty Coaching Stock) moves out of Paddington use diesel rather than electric for the short hop to North Pole, also track circuit issues on the down line near Tilehurst mean it’s diesel from Reading on westbound trains for the time being, rather east of Didcot.  Up trains are unaffected.  I continue to be impressed how smooth the changeover is, both whilst moving and stationary, and how quiet the diesel engines are both internally and externally.

However, I’m sure there are many technical issues still being addressed (the reservation system for one), and learning curves being, well, curved!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #418 on: April 09, 2018, 15:09:31 »

The problem on the down main west of Reading must have been fixed around a week before Easter as I have noticed many heading over Cow Lane on electric since then
Logged
mjones
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 408


View Profile
« Reply #419 on: April 09, 2018, 17:58:38 »

Sitting at Pad on the 1800 to Bristol, diesel engine rumbling merrily away!
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 170
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page