Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:55 28 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:20 Reading to Shalford
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:30 Shalford to Reading
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 21:12:34 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[118] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[116] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[89] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Return of the BRUTE?
[38] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[28] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 39 40 [41] 42 43 ... 170
  Print  
Author Topic: IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent performance issues  (Read 543896 times)
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 965


View Profile
« Reply #600 on: June 27, 2018, 23:24:05 »

I don’t think the introduction has been handled badly by GWR (Great Western Railway), I just think you’re going to get more issues when you’re forced to rapidly introduce new trains as opposed to the planned phased introduction.

First new train 16th October 2017 with a couple of diagrams, further diagrams every few weeks.  Firstly South Wales and Bristol turns, then some extensions to Taunton an Carmarthen.  Followed by north and south Cotswolds.   Hereford services to come, and next month there's a start made on the South West services.   Initially 5 car trains were introduced; now 9 car ones are coming on tap too.   Looks very much like a planned phased introduction to me!

HST (High Speed Train) sets started going off lease in July/August 2017 having had their lease contracts extended for as long as possible.  The lease for the Porterbrook HST’s all expired in 09/17 with the remaining HSTs gone by 01/19
The original plan was for the first IET (Intercity Express Train) to be delivered by the end of 2014 with testing completed by March 2015.  The date of the first 5-car IET being accepted was scheduled for 25/05/17 with them all delivered by 08/02/18.
The acceptance of the 9-cars was scheduled to commence on the 15/02/18 with them all delivered by 06/07/18
This is what I mean by a forced introduction.  They are being forced into passenger traffic because there is no alternative, there is no HST back up. Putting them into passenger traffic then has a knock on effect when it comes to training as they don’t have any units available to train on.  This is why you’re now getting 5-car IET’s running in passenger train. 
Hitachi, at the time, didn’t their trains were ready to enter traffic.  They still wanted more time for testing.
Today, they had 29 IETs when they needed 32.  HST wise, they had 30 sets available when they needed 33.

Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #601 on: June 28, 2018, 06:00:16 »

I don’t think the introduction has been handled badly by GWR (Great Western Railway), I just think you’re going to get more issues when you’re forced to rapidly introduce new trains as opposed to the planned phased introduction.

First new train 16th October 2017 with a couple of diagrams, further diagrams every few weeks.  Firstly South Wales and Bristol turns, then some extensions to Taunton an Carmarthen.  Followed by north and south Cotswolds.   Hereford services to come, and next month there's a start made on the South West services.   Initially 5 car trains were introduced; now 9 car ones are coming on tap too.   Looks very much like a planned phased introduction to me!

HST (High Speed Train) sets started going off lease in July/August 2017 having had their lease contracts extended for as long as possible.  The lease for the Porterbrook HST’s all expired in 09/17 with the remaining HSTs gone by 01/19
The original plan was for the first IET (Intercity Express Train) to be delivered by the end of 2014 with testing completed by March 2015.  The date of the first 5-car IET being accepted was scheduled for 25/05/17 with them all delivered by 08/02/18.
The acceptance of the 9-cars was scheduled to commence on the 15/02/18 with them all delivered by 06/07/18
This is what I mean by a forced introduction.  They are being forced into passenger traffic because there is no alternative, there is no HST back up. Putting them into passenger traffic then has a knock on effect when it comes to training as they don’t have any units available to train on.  This is why you’re now getting 5-car IET’s running in passenger train. 
Hitachi, at the time, didn’t their trains were ready to enter traffic.  They still wanted more time for testing.
Today, they had 29 IETs when they needed 32.  HST wise, they had 30 sets available when they needed 33.



Indeed they would have liked longer and have had some very serious shortage, testing and training issues to contend with that have changed the original timescale.  But only in the rail industry would a process that takes over a year to change trains be describes as rapid, and a process in which we've been looking ahead to next January for the last 12 months fail to b described as planned.   And without all the trains changing at the same time, I don't see how the word phased cannot be applied.

There are examples of rapid in our rail industry.  How long did the new station at Workington North take to build and open?  And how long did it take to add the temporary car park at Tiverton Parkway during the Dawlish blockade - indeed look how quickly the whole works were done at Dawlish. 
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 965


View Profile
« Reply #602 on: June 28, 2018, 07:18:06 »

I don’t think the introduction has been handled badly by GWR (Great Western Railway), I just think you’re going to get more issues when you’re forced to rapidly introduce new trains as opposed to the planned phased introduction.

First new train 16th October 2017 with a couple of diagrams, further diagrams every few weeks.  Firstly South Wales and Bristol turns, then some extensions to Taunton an Carmarthen.  Followed by north and south Cotswolds.   Hereford services to come, and next month there's a start made on the South West services.   Initially 5 car trains were introduced; now 9 car ones are coming on tap too.   Looks very much like a planned phased introduction to me!

HST (High Speed Train) sets started going off lease in July/August 2017 having had their lease contracts extended for as long as possible.  The lease for the Porterbrook HST’s all expired in 09/17 with the remaining HSTs gone by 01/19
The original plan was for the first IET (Intercity Express Train) to be delivered by the end of 2014 with testing completed by March 2015.  The date of the first 5-car IET being accepted was scheduled for 25/05/17 with them all delivered by 08/02/18.
The acceptance of the 9-cars was scheduled to commence on the 15/02/18 with them all delivered by 06/07/18
This is what I mean by a forced introduction.  They are being forced into passenger traffic because there is no alternative, there is no HST back up. Putting them into passenger traffic then has a knock on effect when it comes to training as they don’t have any units available to train on.  This is why you’re now getting 5-car IET’s running in passenger train. 
Hitachi, at the time, didn’t their trains were ready to enter traffic.  They still wanted more time for testing.
Today, they had 29 IETs when they needed 32.  HST wise, they had 30 sets available when they needed 33.



Indeed they would have liked longer and have had some very serious shortage, testing and training issues to contend with that have changed the original timescale.  But only in the rail industry would a process that takes over a year to change trains be describes as rapid, and a process in which we've been looking ahead to next January for the last 12 months fail to b described as planned.   And without all the trains changing at the same time, I don't see how the word phased cannot be applied.

There are examples of rapid in our rail industry.  How long did the new station at Workington North take to build and open?  And how long did it take to add the temporary car park at Tiverton Parkway during the Dawlish blockade - indeed look how quickly the whole works were done at Dawlish. 

There’s a plan and to an extent it is a phased entry, but that phased entry is driven by a lack of other suitable rolling stock namely the HST.  Had every part of the project, electrification, train delivery and testing etc been on time, the phased introduction would have been based on available crew and you wouldn’t have had those situations where services were cancelled because there was a lack of a trained driver. 
The first run of a 9-car set wasn’t planned.  They were told it’s not available for use but a lack of other stock means it was forced into use.
The company is having to train, at a guess, 400-500 drivers maybe more, on the IET. It takes the best part of a month to train one driver.  That’s a huge undertaking and given the training stipulations made by Hitachi it’s been a job well done, it’s not been perfect though. 
The IET was due to enter traffic in the West Country next month, unlikely to happen as there’s still a host of operating restrictions on them which haven’t been cleared by NR» (Network Rail - home page) which means it’s now looking like it’ll be August.  This will stretch the HSTs even further and also,  those West Country drivers already passed as competent may be required to go back to the classroom to refresh their IET knowledge.
Training a driver isn’t as simple as building a car park!
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #603 on: June 28, 2018, 09:02:29 »

Two very good explanations from a-driver.

What a pity the GWR (Great Western Railway) hierarchy haven't seen fit to be so frank & honest with their customers. Had they done so, they may not have found themselves & their organisation treated with so much ridicule & contempt.
Logged
WelshBluebird
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 158


View Profile Email
« Reply #604 on: June 28, 2018, 09:55:14 »

People trying to shame GWR (Great Western Railway) on twitter because their train says “delayed” and turns out to be one minute late.

At least speaking from my own experience, that is usually down to the live departure boards just saying "delayed" which means that the passenger may not know it will just be 1 minute late when they tweet.
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #605 on: June 28, 2018, 09:59:14 »

The contrast is with TfL» (Transport for London - about) which is spending an age phasing in the Class 345, having the backstop of no real pressure regarding redeployment of the 315s that they are replacing out of Liverpool Street.
Logged
Sixty3Closure
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 501


View Profile
« Reply #606 on: June 28, 2018, 13:46:58 »

People trying to shame GWR (Great Western Railway) on twitter because their train says “delayed” and turns out to be one minute late.

At least speaking from my own experience, that is usually down to the live departure boards just saying "delayed" which means that the passenger may not know it will just be 1 minute late when they tweet.

Bit like when it says 'on time' and is then cancelled. I think unfortunately GWR's track record (no pun intended) means people won't give them the benefit of the doubt any more. 
Logged
YouKnowNothing
Full Member
***
Posts: 72


View Profile Email
« Reply #607 on: June 28, 2018, 21:20:28 »


Is there a published programme for the stock introduction?

I don’t think the introduction has been handled badly by GWR (Great Western Railway), I just think you’re going to get more issues when you’re forced to rapidly introduce new trains as opposed to the planned phased introduction.

First new train 16th October 2017 with a couple of diagrams, further diagrams every few weeks.  Firstly South Wales and Bristol turns, then some extensions to Taunton an Carmarthen.  Followed by north and south Cotswolds.   Hereford services to come, and next month there's a start made on the South West services.   Initially 5 car trains were introduced; now 9 car ones are coming on tap too.   Looks very much like a planned phased introduction to me!

HST (High Speed Train) sets started going off lease in July/August 2017 having had their lease contracts extended for as long as possible.  The lease for the Porterbrook HST’s all expired in 09/17 with the remaining HSTs gone by 01/19
The original plan was for the first IET (Intercity Express Train) to be delivered by the end of 2014 with testing completed by March 2015.  The date of the first 5-car IET being accepted was scheduled for 25/05/17 with them all delivered by 08/02/18.
The acceptance of the 9-cars was scheduled to commence on the 15/02/18 with them all delivered by 06/07/18
This is what I mean by a forced introduction.  They are being forced into passenger traffic because there is no alternative, there is no HST back up. Putting them into passenger traffic then has a knock on effect when it comes to training as they don’t have any units available to train on.  This is why you’re now getting 5-car IET’s running in passenger train. 
Hitachi, at the time, didn’t their trains were ready to enter traffic.  They still wanted more time for testing.
Today, they had 29 IETs when they needed 32.  HST wise, they had 30 sets available when they needed 33.


Logged
Sixty3Closure
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 501


View Profile
« Reply #608 on: July 02, 2018, 18:15:51 »

Had my first journey in one and apparently it was the first run for the train itself so I'm guessing it was one of the 9 cars ones. 17.06 to Frome (or it might be Westbury seems to vary).

Sadly not a great experience as the train manager announced the doors wouldn't be opening in carriages A+B only for them not to open in C either. Mad rush to get off hindered by the refreshments trolley half way down coach C. The train crew didn't know why the doors hadn't opened and didn't seem able to over-ride it. A shame to start a maiden voyage late after the first stop.

Not quite as bad as the delay on the 12 car EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) at Maidenhead though

Can't comment on the seats as didn't have one but i did find the vestible quite dark and cramped compared to the 125s and it was difficult to work out which coach I was in.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #609 on: July 02, 2018, 18:26:22 »

Had my first journey in one and apparently it was the first run for the train itself so I'm guessing it was one of the 9 cars ones. 17.06 to Frome (or it might be Westbury seems to vary).

Sadly not a great experience as the train manager announced the doors wouldn't be opening in carriages A+B only for them not to open in C either. Mad rush to get off hindered by the refreshments trolley half way down coach C. The train crew didn't know why the doors hadn't opened and didn't seem able to over-ride it. A shame to start a maiden voyage late after the first stop.

Not quite as bad as the delay on the 12 car EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) at Maidenhead though

Can't comment on the seats as didn't have one but i did find the vestible quite dark and cramped compared to the 125s and it was difficult to work out which coach I was in.

Sounds like a fantastic experience! 🙈
Logged
FarWestJohn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 235


View Profile
« Reply #610 on: July 02, 2018, 18:55:05 »

Sounds like one of the better experiences of an IET (Intercity Express Train).
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #611 on: July 02, 2018, 20:21:30 »

It barely lost any time enroute which was good to see.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9809



View Profile
« Reply #612 on: July 03, 2018, 05:17:03 »

According to Journeycheck the 17:07 to Frome is likely to be five coaches rather than nine tonight. 

Should solve the problem with short platforms at least.
Logged
CMRail
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 400


View Profile
« Reply #613 on: July 03, 2018, 06:54:03 »

First short form to Cheltenham last night, full and standing up to Gloucester in most coaches. 17:42 service.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #614 on: July 03, 2018, 07:28:43 »

24 half length IETs (Intercity Express Train) today, mainly 5 car instead of 10 car, but some 5 car instead of 9 also.

Outside of these forums and the rail industry, hardly anyone believes that the new trains are an improvement.
Two neighbours have travelled on what I believe were IETs, both thought that a "local train" had been sent instead of an "intercity train" The reduced train length, the absence of a buffet, the hard seats, and no reservations, all suggested "local type of train"
One person even stated that "it will be OK when they get the new trains" and was shocked by my statement that these ARE the new trains.

There is considerable anger in the West country tourist industry that this downgrade is deterring visitors.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 39 40 [41] 42 43 ... 170
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page