Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:35 28 Mar 2024
* Manhunt after stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
Delayed
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:48 London Paddington to Swansea
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:51 Warminster to Gloucester
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 11:41:36 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[161] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[91] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[62] Return of the BRUTE?
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[49] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[38] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 49 50 [51] 52 53 ... 170
  Print  
Author Topic: IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent performance issues  (Read 543763 times)
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1243



View Profile
« Reply #750 on: August 02, 2018, 21:05:22 »

Introduced today is a crazy scheme to tell everyone how the train is assembled before it arrives in the station. Didcot 06:25 this [2-8-18] morning and the Platform 2 display announces 'First Class in Coaches D, E, K, and L'. Well like that is useful - those are the first class coaches on a 10 car set.

I enquire of platform staff. Their puzzlement matches mine.

Finally, over the tannoy, 'Sonya' (as opposed to her father) announces that First Class is in coaches 1,2, 6 and 7.  I get that (front and middle) - and agree with the platform staff that, at last, we have some tangible information.

Train [1A02] arrives in reverse formation!  Much running ensues...

Who thought of this latest wonderful idea?

GWR (Great Western Railway)/Hitachi:- Please think again. Can I say that more slowly please:- 'P l e a s e   t h i n k   a g a i n'
Logged
CMRail
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 400


View Profile
« Reply #751 on: August 03, 2018, 00:05:05 »

I get your point well and truely, but for future reference the information board shows the atcuall formation. Platform staff don’t use it even though it is accurate, it showed a HST (High Speed Train) in reverse formation with: L K K F D C B A correctly shown. The man with the bike was annoyed at platform staff for not knowing.

But yes, bad idea by Hitachi however the information at Didcot is good, especially with the carriage numbers shown on the ground now.
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #752 on: August 03, 2018, 04:44:20 »

22 short 5 instead of 10 IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) at 04:40 this am AND its Friday too, well at least there is no short formed Penzance / Plymouths - Paddington and vicky-versy 3 instead of 8 HSTs (High Speed Train) YET.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #753 on: August 03, 2018, 06:08:44 »

22 short 5 instead of 10 IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) at 04:40 this am AND its Friday too, well at least there is no short formed Penzance / Plymouths - Paddington and vicky-versy 3 instead of 8 HSTs (High Speed Train) YET.

Less bad (at 05:18) - still 22 changed formations but some not so badly changed.   How many seats do you loose going down from a ten car to a nine, bearing in mind removal of the two driving ends in the middle?

Quote
07:45 London Paddington to Swansea due 10:45
Facilities on the 07:45 London Paddington to Swansea due 10:45.
This is due to a fault on this train.
Will be formed of 9 coaches instead of 10.

Quote
11:29 Swansea to London Paddington due 14:30
Facilities on the 11:29 Swansea to London Paddington due 14:30.
This is due to a fault on this train.
Will be formed of 9 coaches instead of 10.
Last Updated:03/08/2018 05:18

Quote
15:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads due 16:40
Facilities on the 15:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads due 16:40.
This is due to a fault on this train.
Will be formed of 9 coaches instead of 10.
Last Updated:03/08/2018 05:18

Quote
17:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington due 18:44
Facilities on the 17:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington due 18:44.
This is due to a fault on this train.
Will be formed of 9 coaches instead of 10.
Last Updated:03/08/2018 05:18

Quote
19:12 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads due 20:59
Facilities on the 19:12 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads due 20:59.
This is due to a fault on this train.
Will be formed of 9 coaches instead of 10.
Last Updated:03/08/2018 05:18
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #754 on: August 03, 2018, 06:32:54 »

The seating capacity of a 5+5 IET (Intercity Express Train) and a 9 car are virtually identical, so the substitution of a 9 car for a 5+5 is of almost no direct significance to the passenger.

It does however perhaps suggest a worrying level of non availability of 5 car units.
A pair of 5 car units are broken, so send a 9 car.
9 car unit therefore not available for planned working.
Send an HST (High Speed Train) instead of the 9 car.
All well and good whilst HSTs are still available, but when they are gone ?
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #755 on: August 03, 2018, 06:54:39 »

It does however perhaps suggest a worrying level of non availability of 5 car units.

A number of the 5 car units have now been in service for 9 months ... and running prior to that for testing.  Routine maintenance programs were laid down with the introduction, with (this bit not exact) monthly, quarterly and annual elements.  It has turned out that one particular time-consuming task that was supposed to be annual is actually needed quarterly at present, and (?) pending potential engineering changes and additional availability of more trained maintenance staff, Hitachi have a challenge.  Problem noted, reasons known, actions in place to fix the issue.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #756 on: August 03, 2018, 07:05:09 »

It does however perhaps suggest a worrying level of non availability of 5 car units.

A number of the 5 car units have now been in service for 9 months ... and running prior to that for testing.  Routine maintenance programs were laid down with the introduction, with (this bit not exact) monthly, quarterly and annual elements.  It has turned out that one particular time-consuming task that was supposed to be annual is actually needed quarterly at present, and (?) pending potential engineering changes and additional availability of more trained maintenance staff, Hitachi have a challenge.  Problem noted, reasons known, actions in place to fix the issue.

No, GWR (Great Western Railway) have a challenge.

The title of this thread illustrates that these trains are now almost a year into service, and much of this is still basic snagging that should be been evident/resolved much earlier. Dozens of trains running at half their intended/promised length on a daily basis. It's just a further example of the Alice in Wonderland nature of our railways.




« Last Edit: August 03, 2018, 07:12:39 by TaplowGreen » Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #757 on: August 03, 2018, 07:23:47 »

A number of the 5 car units have now been in service for 9 months ... and running prior to that for testing.  Routine maintenance programs were laid down with the introduction, with (this bit not exact) monthly, quarterly and annual elements.  It has turned out that one particular time-consuming task that was supposed to be annual is actually needed quarterly at present, and (?) pending potential engineering changes and additional availability of more trained maintenance staff, Hitachi have a challenge.  Problem noted, reasons known, actions in place to fix the issue.

This gives rise to at least two questions.
Firstly, do we know what the problem is ? Is it the not very accessible radiator that becomes debris clogged and is a challenge to clean ? or something else.

Secondly, whatever the problem is, will it also affect the mechanically VERY similar 9 car units ?

Are Hitachi paying the price in money for all this non availability of the new trains, or is there some wiggle room whereby they can claim that it is a customer problem and not a supplier problem.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1450



View Profile
« Reply #758 on: August 03, 2018, 09:30:29 »

Roger Ford in the current Modern Railways looks at the new trains, including the Cl 800 (p36). The moving annual average MTIN (minutes per technical incident) is 4693, well below the Cl 700.& 707. Even Northern pacer fleet has a better figure (8933).

This low level is common for new fleets but they do not seem to be showing the so called ‘Bath tub’ profile where reliability suddenly takes off. This seems to apply to all the above fleets.

The following page looks at the effect of the summer’s heat on the Class 800. Apparently on one day half the diagrammed units were out of action due to overheating.

P71 onwards has a feature on GWR (Great Western Railway).
Logged
eXPassenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 547


View Profile
« Reply #759 on: August 03, 2018, 10:14:59 »

The 9-car units were due for earlier delivery but they were all-electric 801s and only Cardiff will be fully electrified, so they had to be modified to 800s with diesel engines.  If only Network Rail had electrified the whole line to the original timetable.

I have no idea where this bit of reverse engineered history came from, but it's not true. The order with all the 5-car trains (800s) first and then 9-car (originally electric 801) trains was in the original agreements with Hitachi/Agility and the GWR (Great Western Railway) franchise. They are just all turning up about 3 months late, that's all.
My understanding (and I am probably wrong) was that when the 801s were converted to 800s this caused the delivery schedule to slip for the 9-cars.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #760 on: August 04, 2018, 11:20:36 »

The usual selection of half length IETs (Intercity Express Train) today.
Two things that I noticed, firstly at least two short formations are listed as being 5 car instead of 9 car. rather than the usual 5 car instead of 10 car. This suggests that the very recently introduced 9 car units are starting to fail.

Also as the IETS spread, more destinations are suffering downgrading to DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit). Weston Super Mare and Hereford are now affected, which will no doubt upset the tourist authorities in those places.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #761 on: August 04, 2018, 11:46:30 »

One 9-car diagram currently being covered by a 5-car set today.  Currently at Hereford where as we've discussed 9-car operation is currently very problematic due to platform and signalling conflicts.

Four more journeys as a passenger for me on 800s this week.  Plenty of seating available, air-con working, on time.  Trolley seen on three out of the four (though two of my journeys were very short ones) - on one occasion it looked like a hot food order had been placed, prepared in the kitchen, and delivered to the passengers seat in standard class at 11pm.  Perhaps I was hallucinating though?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #762 on: August 04, 2018, 12:01:53 »

Presuming that you were NOT hallucinating, then I am impressed if the promised hot food service in standard class is actually appearing.
I remain un impressed by the lack of a buffet, the hard seats, the frequent short formations and the absence of a through gangway on allegedly intercity trains.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 455


View Profile
« Reply #763 on: August 04, 2018, 16:36:47 »

Roger Ford in the current Modern Railways looks at the new trains, including the Cl 800 (p36). The moving annual average MTIN (minutes per technical incident) is 4693, well below the Cl 700.& 707. Even Northern pacer fleet has a better figure (8933).

This low level is common for new fleets but they do not seem to be showing the so called ‘Bath tub’ profile where reliability suddenly takes off. This seems to apply to all the above fleets.

The following page looks at the effect of the summer’s heat on the Class 800. Apparently on one day half the diagrammed units were out of action due to overheating.

P71 onwards has a feature on GWR (Great Western Railway).
A small point... the 'M' in MTIN is 'miles' not 'minutes'...

(I'll crawl back under my stone now  Smiley )
Logged
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1450



View Profile
« Reply #764 on: August 04, 2018, 16:42:24 »

Apologies, I should have checked first.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 49 50 [51] 52 53 ... 170
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page