Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 04:55 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
07:00 Bedwyn to Newbury
07:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:13 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:12 Reading to Bedwyn
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 Bedwyn to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 04:57:10 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[98] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[97] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[86] Return of the BRUTE?
[74] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[23] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 57 58 [59] 60 61 ... 170
  Print  
Author Topic: IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent performance issues  (Read 544031 times)
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #870 on: August 23, 2018, 22:28:55 »

This is something like update number 60 since entering traffic!   More updates to come.
Gosh, worse than Microsoft!

Exactly like it.. it (Hitatchi) claims its 100% complete yet in reality it is not!

Have they tried switching it off & switching it on again?
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #871 on: August 24, 2018, 06:24:06 »

Rail manufacturers really need to make more effort to stop making something built in the 1970s look so good.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #872 on: August 24, 2018, 07:19:40 »

Can't get this one to work can they? Cancelled yesterday and delayed on Wednesday.

05:53 Plymouth to London Paddington due 09:00
05:53 Plymouth to London Paddington due 09:00 has been delayed at Plymouth and is now 46 minutes late.
This is due to this train being late from the depot
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9810



View Profile
« Reply #873 on: August 24, 2018, 08:38:07 »

It has struggled a bit this week.  There was a points problem near Laira Depot this morning, not sure if that was the issue.
Logged
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #874 on: August 24, 2018, 09:29:32 »

Quote
05:53 Plymouth to London Paddington due 09:00 has been delayed at Plymouth and is now 46 minutes late

Seems to have lost more time en-route, just ran through Newbury 66 late! Every train coming up the B&H (Berks and Hants - railway line from Reading to Taunton via Westbury) from the south-west this morning seems to be picking-up 10-15 minute delays in the Somerton to Castle Cary area (same with 1A75 which is an HST (High Speed Train))?
« Last Edit: August 24, 2018, 09:35:15 by Thatcham Crossing » Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #875 on: August 24, 2018, 09:37:56 »

Quote
05:53 Plymouth to London Paddington due 09:00 has been delayed at Plymouth and is now 46 minutes late

Seems to have lost more time en-route, just ran through Newbury 66 late! Every train coming up the B&H (Berks and Hants - railway line from Reading to Taunton via Westbury) from the south-west this morning seems to be picking-up 10-15 minute delays in the Somerton to Castle Cary area (same with 1A75 which is an HST (High Speed Train))?


That's due to speed restrictions due to the ongoing embankment stability issues.
Logged
Phantom
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 484



View Profile
« Reply #876 on: August 24, 2018, 09:49:35 »

An explanation by an insider on the WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) Forum (23/08/2018):

Quote
With reference to the lack of units this week, Hitachi are doing software modifications to the fleet. Due to the way they are done they can't be done at the same time which means booking each unit in twice - one of the modifications can take up to an hour per vehicle, so getting them back in service for the following day has proven a challenge.

Hitachi have aim to have all units done by this Monday.

I assume by one hour per vehicle they literally mean per coach?

Interestingly someone I know that works for Hitachi claims this to be BS, do you have the original URL please?
He is always VERY defensive on this issue
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #877 on: August 24, 2018, 12:40:35 »

And did not my crystal ball SPECIFICALLY forecast software and computer issues ?

I cant find the post now, but I believe that I wrote something like

"Diesel engines and electric drives are mature technologies, and given competent design and manufacture should prove reasonably reliable. A reasonable level of redundancy should ensure that the train can still proceed in case of component failure. Software however is NEVER a mature technology, if it works it must be obsolete !
The new DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) contain numerous computers all of which must work together, first time every time"

I fear that software issues may be ongoing. The software is no doubt complex and propriety with a significant risk that each fix introduces another flaw.

This is in contrast to say the clogged radiator issues in the recent warm weather. That sounds a very poor design but there are obvious engineering remedies to the problem.
1) re locate the radiator.
2) devise some special tool or machine to clean it
3) make the radiator bigger so that even when partly clogged it will still produce sufficient cooling.
And no doubt other alternatives.

Software that fails to function as intended does not normally have a comparably simple fix.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #878 on: August 24, 2018, 13:37:11 »

An explanation by an insider on the WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) Forum (23/08/2018):

Quote
With reference to the lack of units this week, Hitachi are doing software modifications to the fleet. Due to the way they are done they can't be done at the same time which means booking each unit in twice - one of the modifications can take up to an hour per vehicle, so getting them back in service for the following day has proven a challenge.

Hitachi have aim to have all units done by this Monday.

I assume by one hour per vehicle they literally mean per coach?

Interestingly someone I know that works for Hitachi claims this to be BS, do you have the original URL please?
He is always VERY defensive on this issue.

Response given by PM.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #879 on: August 24, 2018, 14:04:45 »

And did not my crystal ball SPECIFICALLY forecast software and computer issues ?

Yes, you did write something like that and I don’t think anyone disagreed with you as it was a pretty safe bet that a new train with groundbreaking technology would have glitches.  It doesn’t help that the SDO (Selective Door Opening) system needs regular updates as the platform extensions slowly get completed when ideally they would all have been finished before the trains entered service.

Other glitches have taken much longer than they should have been to fix, surprising me in the process,  such as the reservation system.  Though I expect, like the 387s which now perform pretty well after a shorter bedding in period given their introduction on other TOC (Train Operating Company)’s before, Hitachi will get on top of things before long.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #880 on: August 24, 2018, 14:12:14 »

It doesn’t help that the SDO (Selective Door Opening) system needs regular updates as the platform extensions slowly get completed when ideally they would all have been finished before the trains entered service ...

It really should not be / have been beyond the wit of programmers to allow platform lengths to be variable and downloadable without the need for a software update, in much the way that passenger journey start and end points can be downloaded on a daily or even service by service basis.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #881 on: August 24, 2018, 16:59:52 »

And did not my crystal ball SPECIFICALLY forecast software and computer issues ?

Yes, you did write something like that and I don’t think anyone disagreed with you as it was a pretty safe bet that a new train with groundbreaking technology would have glitches.  It doesn’t help that the SDO (Selective Door Opening) system needs regular updates as the platform extensions slowly get completed when ideally they would all have been finished before the trains entered service.

Other glitches have taken much longer than they should have been to fix, surprising me in the process,  such as the reservation system.  Though I expect, like the 387s which now perform pretty well after a shorter bedding in period given their introduction on other TOC (Train Operating Company)’s before, Hitachi will get on top of things before long.

I accept glitches and snagging but this is very nearly a year in service now, with (it would seem) new issues popping up all the time - it's really not a very good story, and yet another example of GWR (Great Western Railway) raising expectations that they ultimately don't get anywhere near meeting.
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 965


View Profile
« Reply #882 on: August 24, 2018, 17:11:35 »

And did not my crystal ball SPECIFICALLY forecast software and computer issues ?

Yes, you did write something like that and I don’t think anyone disagreed with you as it was a pretty safe bet that a new train with groundbreaking technology would have glitches.  It doesn’t help that the SDO (Selective Door Opening) system needs regular updates as the platform extensions slowly get completed when ideally they would all have been finished before the trains entered service.

Other glitches have taken much longer than they should have been to fix, surprising me in the process,  such as the reservation system.  Though I expect, like the 387s which now perform pretty well after a shorter bedding in period given their introduction on other TOC (Train Operating Company)’s before, Hitachi will get on top of things before long.

I accept glitches and snagging but this is very nearly a year in service now, with (it would seem) new issues popping up all the time - it's really not a very good story, and yet another example of GWR (Great Western Railway) raising expectations that they ultimately don't get anywhere near meeting.

To be fair to GWR, there was no indication given that there was going to be issues. The testing of the units should have been undertaken by GWR. Instead the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) awarded the contract to GBRf.  I’m guessing it was just driven up and down whereas GWR could have simulated service conditions ie coupling and uncoupling, ASDO (Automatic Selective Door Operation), APCo etc.
Some of the issues can’t be rectified because they require infrastructure work or simply it’s a contract stipulation between Hitachi and the DfT.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #883 on: August 24, 2018, 17:24:42 »

And did not my crystal ball SPECIFICALLY forecast software and computer issues ?

Yes, you did write something like that and I don’t think anyone disagreed with you as it was a pretty safe bet that a new train with groundbreaking technology would have glitches.  It doesn’t help that the SDO (Selective Door Opening) system needs regular updates as the platform extensions slowly get completed when ideally they would all have been finished before the trains entered service.

Other glitches have taken much longer than they should have been to fix, surprising me in the process,  such as the reservation system.  Though I expect, like the 387s which now perform pretty well after a shorter bedding in period given their introduction on other TOC (Train Operating Company)’s before, Hitachi will get on top of things before long.

I accept glitches and snagging but this is very nearly a year in service now, with (it would seem) new issues popping up all the time - it's really not a very good story, and yet another example of GWR (Great Western Railway) raising expectations that they ultimately don't get anywhere near meeting.

To be fair to GWR, there was no indication given that there was going to be issues. The testing of the units should have been undertaken by GWR. Instead the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) awarded the contract to GBRf.  I’m guessing it was just driven up and down whereas GWR could have simulated service conditions ie coupling and uncoupling, ASDO (Automatic Selective Door Operation), APCo etc.
Some of the issues can’t be rectified because they require infrastructure work or simply it’s a contract stipulation between Hitachi and the DfT.

I guess that by definition glitches don't come with advance indications or a big red light flashing on them, otherwise they could have been addressed in advance, but there's a saying that GWR should remember for future reference which may help prevent them being quite such a laughing stock - under promise, over deliver...

……….if you launch/jump on board one expensive advertising campaign after another, promising the world ("Building a Greater West", "Famous Five", more capacity and reliability than ever before etc), and the whole thing falls apart, people are much angrier because they've been led to expect a transformational experience.

Sometimes, a softer launch is better, whereby customers are pleasantly surprised by steady improvement on a smooth curve, and are more understanding of teething problems (especially if you have an MD who has the cojones and integrity to come out and admit when things have gone wrong with an action plan & timeline for putting them right, rather than hiding in the Boardroom)

Irrespective of pointing the finger of blame at other agencies, GWR are 100% responsible for the expectations they've raised, and failed to manage.
Logged
devonexpress
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 294


View Profile
« Reply #884 on: August 24, 2018, 22:15:59 »

And did not my crystal ball SPECIFICALLY forecast software and computer issues ?

Yes, you did write something like that and I don’t think anyone disagreed with you as it was a pretty safe bet that a new train with groundbreaking technology would have glitches.  It doesn’t help that the SDO (Selective Door Opening) system needs regular updates as the platform extensions slowly get completed when ideally they would all have been finished before the trains entered service.

Other glitches have taken much longer than they should have been to fix, surprising me in the process,  such as the reservation system.  Though I expect, like the 387s which now perform pretty well after a shorter bedding in period given their introduction on other TOC (Train Operating Company)’s before, Hitachi will get on top of things before long.

I accept glitches and snagging but this is very nearly a year in service now, with (it would seem) new issues popping up all the time - it's really not a very good story, and yet another example of GWR (Great Western Railway) raising expectations that they ultimately don't get anywhere near meeting.

To be fair to GWR, there was no indication given that there was going to be issues. The testing of the units should have been undertaken by GWR. Instead the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) awarded the contract to GBRf.  I’m guessing it was just driven up and down whereas GWR could have simulated service conditions ie coupling and uncoupling, ASDO (Automatic Selective Door Operation), APCo etc.
Some of the issues can’t be rectified because they require infrastructure work or simply it’s a contract stipulation between Hitachi and the DfT.

I guess that by definition glitches don't come with advance indications or a big red light flashing on them, otherwise they could have been addressed in advance, but there's a saying that GWR should remember for future reference which may help prevent them being quite such a laughing stock - under promise, over deliver...

……….if you launch/jump on board one expensive advertising campaign after another, promising the world ("Building a Greater West", "Famous Five", more capacity and reliability than ever before etc), and the whole thing falls apart, people are much angrier because they've been led to expect a transformational experience.

Sometimes, a softer launch is better, whereby customers are pleasantly surprised by steady improvement on a smooth curve, and are more understanding of teething problems (especially if you have an MD who has the cojones and integrity to come out and admit when things have gone wrong with an action plan & timeline for putting them right, rather than hiding in the Boardroom)

Irrespective of pointing the finger of blame at other agencies, GWR are 100% responsible for the expectations they've raised, and failed to manage.

Agreed GWR basically took a massive dump on themselves with the 4 years of building a greater west and the last year of the famous five.  I'm not surprised the IET (Intercity Express Train)'s have issues, so doesn't everything new, multimillion pound aircraft, cars, buses, ships, computer etc etc. And I did say this a few weeks before the first IET service that you can expect this for at least the next 2 years (1 year down, 1 to go).   Possibly longer,  people wonder why older stuff is better, its simple because its been run in and most of the problems are known and rectified.

Edited to fix quotes - bobm
« Last Edit: August 25, 2018, 06:41:32 by bobm » Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 57 58 [59] 60 61 ... 170
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page