Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:35 28 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:30 Shalford to Reading
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:20 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
22:10 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 21:49:58 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[104] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[103] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[78] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[56] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Return of the BRUTE?
[25] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 63 64 [65] 66 67 ... 170
  Print  
Author Topic: IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent performance issues  (Read 543911 times)
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #960 on: September 15, 2018, 22:45:23 »

But I thought that the IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) only have to be paid for when they are available ? The recent levels of non availability should be SAVING GWR (Great Western Railway) a lot of money, some of which they could spend on spot hire or monthly hire of a few HSTs (High Speed Train).
Short term hire may be considerably more expensive that long term hire so it may not match. 
Logged
sikejsudjek3
Full Member
***
Posts: 50


View Profile
« Reply #961 on: September 16, 2018, 08:41:38 »

BR (British Rail(ways)) never had this problem......
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #962 on: September 16, 2018, 09:52:10 »

BR (British Rail(ways)) never had this problem......

APT (Advanced Passenger Train)?
Logged
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #963 on: September 16, 2018, 10:00:46 »

In our Sunday paper there is a GWR (Great Western Railway) “Famous Five” advert claiming “More seats, more trains, more adventures”.

I wonder how this would stand up to a complaint to and a subsequent investigation by the Advertising Standards Authority.  The third claim is probably true, but the first two?
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #964 on: September 16, 2018, 10:02:46 »

In our Sunday paper there is a GWR (Great Western Railway) “Famous Five” advert claiming “More seats, more trains, more adventures”.

I wonder how this would stand up to a complaint to and a subsequent investigation by the Advertising Standards Authority.  The third claim is probably true, but the first two?

If you call being stuck on one of their brand new trains that’s broken down for six hours an adventure then yes.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #965 on: September 16, 2018, 10:06:20 »

In our Sunday paper there is a GWR (Great Western Railway) “Famous Five” advert claiming “More seats, more trains, more adventures”.

I wonder how this would stand up to a complaint to and a subsequent investigation by the Advertising Standards Authority.  The third claim is probably true, but the first two?

If you call being stuck on one of their brand new trains that’s broken down for six hours an adventure then yes.

Beat me to it!!!  Grin (I wonder how much these adverts cost by the way?)
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #966 on: September 16, 2018, 10:39:07 »

BR (British Rail(ways)) never had this problem......

APT (Advanced Passenger Train)?

And the HST (High Speed Train) to some extent. I can recall the announcement 'the next train will be instead formed of locomotive-hauled coaches' being all too frequent right through the early 1980s, heralding the arrival of some tatty old mixed rake. Or maybe I was just unlucky ...
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #967 on: September 16, 2018, 13:23:31 »

BR (British Rail(ways)) never had this problem......

APT (Advanced Passenger Train)?

And the HST (High Speed Train) to some extent. I can recall the announcement 'the next train will be instead formed of locomotive-hauled coaches' being all too frequent right through the early 1980s, heralding the arrival of some tatty old mixed rake. Or maybe I was just unlucky ...

Yes, but at least some form of train turned up.....
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #968 on: September 16, 2018, 13:58:44 »

HST (High Speed Train) failures did indeed occur regularly, but this was not comparable  to the present situation with IETs (Intercity Express Train).
A failed HST usually resulted in a FULL LENGTH loco hauled train being substituted, with padded seats, reservations, and a buffet.

Today we get a half length DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) if lucky, or nothing if less lucky.

I, and I suspect many others, would have accepted the IETs if firstly they had been proper inter-city trains, full length, gangwayed throughout, with a buffet car, working reservations, padded seats, and so on, AND if the inevitable initial unreliability had been covered by retaining enough HSTs so as to minimise effects on passengers.

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #969 on: September 16, 2018, 14:07:57 »

HST (High Speed Train) failures did indeed occur regularly, but this was not comparable  to the present situation with IETs (Intercity Express Train).
A failed HST usually resulted in a FULL LENGTH loco hauled train being substituted, with padded seats, reservations, and a buffet.
Or a complete cancellation. And some of the substitute Mark 1 carriages with the bouncy seat springs, fabric impregnated with years of smoke, drafty non completely closing windows or no noticeable heating weren't that pleasant either  Grin

Wasn't it BR (British Rail(ways)) Western Region that if it got hold of stock formally used elsewhere as 3 abreast with armrests used to try and stitch them back upright to seat 4?
Logged
CMRail
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 400


View Profile
« Reply #970 on: September 16, 2018, 14:24:01 »

93% of the time a half formed Class 800 turns up due to a shortage of stock. Not because the seats were too hard for operation.

What do I expect as a semi-frequent commuter?
A seat, a catering offer and leg room. Also when I used to daily commute my block reservations.

What do I expect as a leisure commuter?
A seat/table, a decent catering offering, leg room and a nice view.

The catering offering on the 800 is the same as the HST (High Speed Train) at the moment, and the IET (Intercity Express Train) is capable of offering more food variety. I like the buffet but if I was traveling solo on a semi busy train I don’t want to lug everything through the train to get a cup of tea. If they had 2 on the 9 car that would be better, apparently they are looking into this.

What needs improving for me is the seat quality, food offering (including refrigeration) and 2 trolleys on the nine cars. All things that are possible on the new trains.

If a five coach mark 3 turned up do you expect people to say “at least it’s not a 800?” , no they want a seat.
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #971 on: September 16, 2018, 16:37:11 »

BR (British Rail(ways)) never had this problem......
APT (Advanced Passenger Train)?

Yep, but they didn't press on with production producing a lame duck (so far with the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.)'s) offering.
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #972 on: September 16, 2018, 18:41:45 »

And we have to stir into this mess another depressing thought.

If the electrifcation had not been cut short by (let's blame the real culprit) HM Treasury, the potential of 110 mph Electrostars to step into the breach in emergencies could have been considered too
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #973 on: September 16, 2018, 19:47:53 »

BR (British Rail(ways)) never had this problem......
APT (Advanced Passenger Train)?

Yep, but they didn't press on with production producing a lame duck (so far with the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.)'s) offering.

They probably thought spending £50 million was enough.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #974 on: September 17, 2018, 10:08:36 »

Other TOCs (Train Operating Company) have enquired about those Ely HSTs (High Speed Train) and been told that they're spoken for apparently. So I'm guessing they're not interested in spot-hire either.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 63 64 [65] 66 67 ... 170
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page