Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
Read about the forum [here].
Register and contribute [here] - it's free.
Know when to go - [here]
 07/09/2019 - Railfuture Severnside
08/09/2019 - CCIF initial bids deadline
14/09/2019 - Okehampton to Weymouth
21/09/2019 - RailFuture National, Bristol
25/09/2019 - WWRUG / Transport Focus
03/10/2019 - ACoRP Community Rail Awards
Random Image
Train Running @GWR Twitter Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail news GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4 Chat on off
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
August 23, 2019, 11:30:37 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[87] 2019 - TransWilts cancellation and amendments log
[67] December 2019 timetable recast
[58] Hitchhiker's Guide to the Wales
[56] IEP between Bristol and WSM
[49] Is the service between Oxford and Swindon really practical?
[34] Suggestion: IET internal modifications to make them more bugg...
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 121 122 [123] 124 125 ... 133
  Print  
Author Topic: IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent performance issues  (Read 180017 times)
IndustryInsider
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7467


View Profile
« Reply #1830 on: June 25, 2019, 05:54:23 pm »

Good to hear, though it looks like those on the 1722 are paying the price.

And the 17:52 and 18:37 - though they are less busy trains or busy for less of a distance, so some sensible swapping around going on.
Logged

To view my GWML Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4629


View Profile
« Reply #1831 on: June 25, 2019, 06:31:34 pm »

Ok, well I suppose weíll find out if thereís any substance to it over the coming weeks.  I would certainly favour postponement over trying to deliver something thatís undeliverable, though a postponement would be a big disappointment.

Iíve heard similar rumours from an Hitachi fitter.... First & Hitachi telling the DfT itís not achievable without additional sets, DafT not listening and insisting it should go ahead.  They were saying the new timetable would require all but one or two sets in service every day and some timings donít work whatsoever.  Time will tell I suppose. 

Round and round the blame game goes, as for the customers? Nobody knows (or cares).
Logged
charles_uk
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 521

thewalkingpage
View Profile
« Reply #1832 on: June 25, 2019, 07:24:51 pm »

If it is to be believed, services to South Wales this evening could be unpleasant with the 1715, 1745, 1845, 2015 and 2115 all listed as 5 vice 9/10  Sad

All of those look to be either 9 or 10 cars now, with the exception of the 21:15 which currently hasn't got anything allocated as of yet.

Wonder where they got those from? I posted earlier on the Cotswold Line 2019 amendment thread that most of the evening peak services to Great Malvern/Hereford seem to be five coaches instead of nine, though none reported on JourneyCheck.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7467


View Profile
« Reply #1833 on: June 25, 2019, 09:30:08 pm »

All of those look to be either 9 or 10 cars now, with the exception of the 21:15 which currently hasn't got anything allocated as of yet.

21:15 was also boosted to a 9-car.  JourneyCheck utterly useless in listing trains that are full length as short, and not listing those that are shortformed!
Logged

To view my GWML Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7722



View Profile
« Reply #1834 on: June 25, 2019, 09:30:58 pm »

CIS hasn't caught up either - not showing any details.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7467


View Profile
« Reply #1835 on: June 25, 2019, 09:31:53 pm »

CIS hasn't caught up either - not showing any details.

No, nor my internal system!  Had to resort to watching it pass Slough on Railcam! Nothing beats a bit of mid-evening virtual trainspotting! Wink
Logged

To view my GWML Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7722



View Profile
« Reply #1836 on: June 25, 2019, 09:32:34 pm »

There's dedication to the cause!
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 719


View Profile
« Reply #1837 on: June 25, 2019, 09:49:44 pm »

Ok, well I suppose weíll find out if thereís any substance to it over the coming weeks.  I would certainly favour postponement over trying to deliver something thatís undeliverable, though a postponement would be a big disappointment.

Iíve heard similar rumours from an Hitachi fitter.... First & Hitachi telling the DfT itís not achievable without additional sets, DafT not listening and insisting it should go ahead.  They were saying the new timetable would require all but one or two sets in service every day and some timings donít work whatsoever.  Time will tell I suppose. 

Round and round the blame game goes, as for the customers? Nobody knows (or cares).

People care, people care a lot.  Unfortunately itís the people within the DfT who think they know better because it all works on paper.  Theyíre just going to repeat the same mistakes theyíve made previously. As I said, youíve got both GWR and Hitachi telling the DfT it wonít work and the DfT insisting it will.  How the DfT think it knows better is anyoneís guess. 
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1717


View Profile
« Reply #1838 on: June 26, 2019, 04:14:32 am »

Ok, well I suppose weíll find out if thereís any substance to it over the coming weeks.  I would certainly favour postponement over trying to deliver something thatís undeliverable, though a postponement would be a big disappointment.

Iíve heard similar rumours from an Hitachi fitter.... First & Hitachi telling the DfT itís not achievable without additional sets, DafT not listening and insisting it should go ahead.  They were saying the new timetable would require all but one or two sets in service every day and some timings donít work whatsoever.  Time will tell I suppose. 

Round and round the blame game goes, as for the customers? Nobody knows (or cares).

People care, people care a lot.  Unfortunately itís the people within the DfT who think they know better because it all works on paper.  Theyíre just going to repeat the same mistakes theyíve made previously. As I said, youíve got both GWR and Hitachi telling the DfT it wonít work and the DfT insisting it will.  How the DfT think it knows better is anyoneís guess. 


And when it all goes 'belly up' whom will DfT point the finger at, Network Rail ?
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1717


View Profile
« Reply #1839 on: June 26, 2019, 04:23:39 am »

Already 42 short formations for today on JournetCheck and its not yet 04:30am.
Logged
Wizard
Full Member
***
Posts: 31


View Profile
« Reply #1840 on: June 26, 2019, 07:58:07 am »

Glastonbury?
Logged
bradbrka
Transport Student
Jr. Member
****
Posts: 10


View Profile Email
« Reply #1841 on: June 26, 2019, 08:18:59 am »

Already 42 short formations for today on JournetCheck and its not yet 04:30am.

Is that short formations or formation changes?

Many of the longer distance service changes are 9 rather than 10 which don't really make much difference from a capacity point of view. The 9 car units appear to have been switched from the shorter Oxford services.

Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2713



View Profile
« Reply #1842 on: June 26, 2019, 10:01:53 am »

Still over 20 half length IETs though, 5 car instead of 9 car or 10 car.

Advocates of the IETs will no doubt state that this is in fact a great advantage of DMU operation and that otherwise we would have had no train.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
IndustryInsider
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7467


View Profile
« Reply #1843 on: June 26, 2019, 10:11:07 am »

It does indeed make planning for such events easier.
Logged

To view my GWML Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1717


View Profile
« Reply #1844 on: June 26, 2019, 10:35:26 am »

Glastonbury?

This years Glastonbury has a shuttle bus service from Temple Meads to the site which I have not known of in previous years.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 121 122 [123] 124 125 ... 133
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page